Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​UK national health records database to have ‘backdoors’ for police, govt?

Published time: February 07, 2014 12:31
Reuters / Olivia Harris

Reuters / Olivia Harris

A centralized database of Britons’ health records currently in the making will have backdoors, which would allow the government access to records of those people who opted out of the data bank, according to an MP.

The database known as ‘care.data’, which is to come online in May, will store private medical records collected from family doctors across the country. It will also link records with those collected by the hospitals.

While care.data will not store the names of the patients, it will include National Health System numbers, dates of birth, postcodes, ethnicity and sex, in addition to health condition and prescribed drugs. The goal is to sell access to the data to university researchers, health insurance companies and other parties, which can make use of the information.

Critics of the plan say it exposes too much personal data – enough to identify people on the database – to a system lacking oversight and transparency. Health records in themselves can tell much about the identity of the patient.

For example in 1990-s a similar ‘anonymized’ database was released by the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission. Latanya Sweeney, a then-graduate student in computer science, successfully used it to find medical records of William Weld, then-Governor of Massachusetts, in response his assurances that the identities were safe.

The ramifications may be dire indeed for those same people in power who are advocating the creation of the database, argues Gordon Gancz, a family doctor practicing at Oxford. He is among the vocal critics of the care.data plan.

Britain's Liberal Democrat Shadow Home Secretary David Davis (AFP Photo / Shaun Curry)

“We never stop hearing about how many members of the current government are Oxbridge graduates,” he wrote in a letter to the Daily Mail. “What if a hacker were able to access medical records from 25-30 years ago and, just like that clever Massachusetts graduate student, put records and patients back together? Who knows what youthful indiscretions could come back to haunt our now august political leaders?”

Apart from this potential vulnerability, the health officials are also blamed for making data collection an opt-out, rather than opt-in, which means that many Britons may part with confidential information about them without even knowing it.

But apparently even an informed decision not to participate will not spare a person from having his or her health records sucked into the database. And police will be able to access them without a court warrant while investigating serious crimes, David Davis MP, a former shadow home secretary, told the Guardian.

"The idea that police will be able to request information from a central database without a warrant totally undermines a long-held belief in the confidentiality of the doctor-patient relationship," he said.

The police will have to provide the correct identity of a suspect to request his or her medical records, Davis said, citing Health Services Minister Dan Poulter, who revealed the existence of such ‘backdoors’ in parliamentary questioning.

“When we have police accessing from a database that people have opted out from, and companies being able to buy this data, I think we need to have a debate about whether my property, which are my patient records, can be sold and used," Davis said.

The government defends the database, saying it will provide crucial data needed to identify side-effects of drugs or evaluate performance of the healthcare system. It also denies criticism that it gives out too much private information.

"There are strong legal safeguards in place to protect patients' confidentiality,” a Department of Health spokesperson said. “Any release of identifiable data without consent would only be in a very limited number of exceptional circumstances, where there is a clear basis in existing law – such as for the police to investigate a serious crime."

Comments (7)

 

Jeanie Swann 10.02.2014 10:06

The phrases "smoke and mirrors" and "Big Brother is Watching You" spring to mind.
True, transparent democracy is being eroded in the public sector. Well done to Dr. Gancz and others who have the bravery and intellectual clout to stand up to this political bullying.

public sector in general is being targeted under the guise of consumer choice and "freedom" by those who often have very little professional expertise but huge power. Education is also suffering and those children who are the most vulnerable are often those who, under the current regime, suffer the most.

 

robert stevens 08.02.2014 19:13

when will they tatoo a number plate on our foreheads ?

 

achingforchange 07.02.2014 18:26

Also the shadow home secretary is a role in the opposition.

View all comments (7)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us