Nightmare scenario: UK prepared to down airliners to safeguard Olympics

Published time: May 04, 2012 22:19
Edited time: May 05, 2012 02:19
AFP Photo / Carl Court

The UK Defense Secretary is ready to give the order to shoot down an airliner if he believes the Olympic Games are being threatened by a 9/11 style attack.

Speaking to the Evening Standard newspaper, Philip Hammond has said that he is prepared to do whatever it takes to protect London during the upcoming London Olympics. “The decision to engage would be made at the highest levels of government.”

When asked if he was personally willing to give the order to destroy a rogue aircraft that potentially posed a danger, he replied: “Of course…I’m certainly prepared to make decisions.”

Mr Hammond's comments came as Britain's security forces launched a multi-layered operation with the Navy following the Army and Air Force in showing off its military hardware ahead of the Games.

On Thursday, Royal Marine commandos held a huge exercise off the south coast and HMS Ocean sailed up the Thames to become a floating command centre.

Rapier surface-to-air missiles have also been showcased at Blackheath Army Cadet Centre in south-east London as part of the massive 2012 security test on land, sea and in the air, while earlier in the week Typhoon jets moved to RAF Northolt.

Colonel Jon Campbell, commander of the Joint Ground Based Air Defence, told the Daily Mail newspaper: “We have done as much as we can to allay people's fears."

The Rapier system has world-class radar on it and is particularly good at picking up low and slow-moving objects in the sky. It means we're able to get the very best picture of what is happening in the skies of London.”

The Rapier missile has the power to take down a Boeing 747 full of passengers, if needed, to protect a stadium full of 80,000 Olympic spectators in a terrorism nightmare scenario.

The British military has insisted that the missiles, with a range of up to five miles, could be deployed as the last line of defence.

However, Londoners remain sceptical as experts warn that downing an aircraft would still cause debris to rain from the sky, resulting in high casualties and fires.

Public outrage

Ground-to-air missiles have been a fixture of the Olympic Games and large VIP events in the post-9/11 world, but London's missiles have sparked outrage among residents of an apartment block who learned that the Rapiers might be stationed on their roof.

Occupants of the East London Bow Quarter, that overlooks the GamesPark, were outraged when they were told the site had been chosen as one of a number of proposed plots for the Ministry of Defense’s high-velocity missile system (HVM). Residents say the missiles create a climate of fear.

Occupant Brian Whelan, 28, made headlines when he blew the whistle on the government's plans to the media. He then announced, via Twitter, that we was being evicted from his flat and suggested the move was linked to his exposing the missile system.

Very sad to learn my tenancy is to be terminated and I will be forced to leave my apartment days ahead of the opening ceremony.”

While the move has been deemed necessary to protect the hundreds of thousands expected to visit the capital during the Games, an increasing number of Londoners are voicing concern over what they perceive as an extreme measure.

Mr Hammond, however, remains defiant that the ministry's course is the right one: "My message is that they should be reassured by the military presence,” he said. “There is no risk from the equipment. It’s defensive in nature and pointing skywards.”

Mr Hammond went on to warn protesters not to jeopardise their and the lives of others with "stupid stunts" during the Games.

Comments (76)

RTrocks 09.05.2012 12:57

dsds (unregistered) wrote in #10
Anthony Sanchez wrote in #7
Why not just lock the cockpit's doors...doing that would have prevented 9/11.  9/11 couldn't be prevented it that way those were remote controlled drones - see operation northwood

There were no planes. Just faked holograms of planes flying into buildings as released by the US government. How do you explain the impossible picture angles of those videos of cameramen gawking at uninteresting buildings ... when a plane magically appears on scene, or the lack of serial numbers of aircraft black boxes or the number of witnesses who described "explosions" at ground level, adamant that there were not planes? Don't forget, the buildings went down at freefall speed some 30mins after the "plane hit" claims.

There was a video released under freedom of information showing a missile hitting the Pentagon, the live coverage of CNN describing that no planes were visible at the scene of the apparent 'attack'...

A lso study the improbability of the list of accused hijackers appearing alive in foreign countries and not dying on board the aircraft...

Again, WTC7 provides the best clue of the no planes theory - it was brought down with explosives. Silverstein admitted that WTC7 "was pulled" although he wrongly accused the NYFD of 'agreeing to pull it'.
Flight UA93 was likely shot down by a fighter jet and the victims on this aircraft were real. As for the other planes... they were imaginary. Again, there were no planes involved during 9/11. Just three controlled demolitions. 
Th ink things through like an investigator. Question more!


0

Undo

CDR 09.05.2012 12:38

There is no risk from the equipment. It’s defensive in nature and pointing skywards.”
This is the calibre of the prats that we have in Parliament today. Telling us the bleedin obvious, in the hope that we will perceive missiles on urban rooftops to be "acceptable".
Deliberately downing an aircraft over such a densely populated area will not only kill the so-called terrorists but also kill hundreds of innocent people. It will not "save lives", so what is the bloody point of it in the first place?
One begins to wonder whether a false flag op is up and coming?

+3

Undo

RTrocks 09.05.2012 12:13

C'mon. The game is over.

911 was a set up and the fear mongering in regards to planes that never actually hit buildings was just a cinamatic stunt that could be proven to be fact... except that the NWO want to continue down that same tireless road of MSM to perpetuate the lies that 911 was caused by forces outside of the USA.

When I read reports of this same agenda, I fear that the NWO are planning yet another attack on their "home turf" to shift the blame toward Syria and Iran etc...

+5

Undo

View all comments (76)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us