UN Security Council votes to send 300 observers to Syria

Published time: April 21, 2012 15:29
Edited time: April 22, 2012 07:52
The United Nations Security Council meets at the United Nations in New York to discuss the ongoing violence in Syria April 21, 2012 (Reuters / Allison Joyce)
Download video (41.18 MB)
Embed

The UN Security Council has unanimously voted to pass a resolution increasing the number of ceasefire observers in Syria to 300. Meanwhile, the first wave of observers reached war-torn Homs.

The resolution is aimed at enforcing a truce in the conflict between the Syrian government and the opposition, which was signed last week, but has been broken numerous times since.

The final text was a compromise between two rival versions of the resolution proposed by Russia and the European Union, achieved after hours of negotiation on Friday night.

The sides mostly disagreed over European demands that government forces should remove troops and heavy weapons from major urban centers before observers arrive, and face sanctions if they fail to do so. Russia had asked for no such conditions.

In the end the two sides agreed to go ahead with expanding the observer force, and review further action depending on how the situation unfolds on the ground.

“The resolution solidifies the consensus that has now formed in the Security Council,” said Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s UN representative.

Churkin urged all sides in the dispute to follow the six-point plan formulated by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, who has played a key part in mediating the conflict. Other than peace, the plan calls for the release of political prisoners, freedom to demonstrate, and safe access for foreign humanitarian aid.

The French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe has said that the plan is “the last chance before civil war.”

After the Security Council vote, Churkin warned against a “Libyan scenario”, where a relatively tame original resolution text was used as a basis for military intervention.

The new ceasefire monitors will initially stay in Syria for 90 days, and will supplement the thirty observers who are already on their way to the Middle East country.

­Despite the agreement being reached, the US still is not ruling out “other means” in dealing with the crisis. Political analyst Dan Glazebrook believes this is a coded, veiled threat of extreme violence. “They are still keen to promote this idea that they may conduct some kind of aerial bombardment, a kind of mass slaughter to help their proxies on the ground in order to keep the civil war going,” he told RT.

However, Glazebrook is optimistic about the UN mission and the peaceful settlement of the Syrian crisis. “The Syrian government has shown willingness to negotiate and made serious compromises in the constitutional amendments that were made recently. And more and more [of the] opposition are starting to see that way of thinking as well.”

­

Observers visit heart of conflict

The handful of observers who are already in Syria visited the city of Homs on Saturday morning.

The city has been the focal point of the anti-government uprising since May last year, and the site of some of the conflict’s heaviest skirmishes, but there was no violence during the visit.

The team met with the governor and were then taken on a walking tour through the center.

"The Syrian government is facilitating the work of the observers,” Nidal Kabalan, Syria’s former ambassador to Turkey told RT. “They are being allowed to do their job.”

Meanwhile, opposition leaders claimed the government specifically stopped shelling Homs to impress the visiting monitors.

Syria's official news agency also said that 30 opposition members whose "hands were not stained with the blood of Syrians," were released on Saturday, in accordance with the Annan plan.

At least 9,000 people have died in the Syrian conflict in the last year, according to the UN.

Comments (33)

Maurice2014 26.04.2012 18:10

RT, if you listen, is really reporting on subject matter, issues, and topics that could easily be related to the Illuminati, and the New World Order, though they "never" use these terms anywhere in their broadcasts. Ron Paul knows all about the NWO. Nuttall's Standard Dictionary of the English Language, 1929:Illuminati - "a name given to several sects who affect superios enlightenment; specially those who pride themselves on their superiority to certain orthodox superstitions, or their merely negative attitude to existing creeds and sustems." ~ Frederick Warne & Co., Ltd. London, Printed in Great Britain ~The term New World Order (NWO) has been used by numerous politicians through the ages, and is a generic term used to refer to a Worldwide Conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. "Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave", by Alvin Toffler; Forward written by Newt Gingrich.Listen to the Zionist Banker Paul Warburg, an early advocate of the U.S. Federal Reserve System: "We will have a World Government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that Government will be achieved by conquest, or consent." (February 17, 1950, as he testified before the US Senate). J. Edgar Hoover, ex-FBI Director on the New World Order conspiracy: "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."George H.W. Bush's comment: "if the American People knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts."

0

Undo

tapanuli 23.04.2012 02:03

The sides mostly disagreed over European demands that government forces should remove troops and heavy weapons from major urban centers before observers arrive, and face sanctions if they fail to do so. Russia had asked for no such conditions.This is the language of a highwayman.

0

Undo

Kenny (unregistered) 22.04.2012 15:43

The optimist in me says that peace may finally prevail. However, the pessimist in me has chosen to focus on what Susan Rice has said.

"If there is not a sustained cessation of violence..." the US may veto an extension of the observer mission after 90 days and consider further measures.

The re will be no military intervention whilst UN observers are the ground. However, the US Government is giving an incentive to the opposition to continue their armed resistance. In doing so, the US Government will have grounds to veto an extension of the observer mission and implement those further measures.

Meanwhile, the rebels will have had the opportunity to regroup and rearm. Once the observers leave, the rebels will be armed to the teeth...then perhaps accompanied by that military intervention that their supporters have been calling for...

It was certainly a strange thing for her to say, or anybody else genuinely interested in peace

+4

Undo

View all comments (33)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us