Breaking news

Britain's House of Commons votes to legalize gay marriage in England, Wales

US military plan against China outlined in think-tank report

Published time: August 14, 2012 01:23
Edited time: August 14, 2012 05:23
USS Abraham Lincoln (Reuters / U.S. Navy / Chief Mass Communication Specialist Eric S. Powell / Handout)

As analysts around the world question whether the US is losing its superpower status, China’s influence in the Asia-Pacific region is strengthening. But a new report has set out a strategy for America to increase its military presence in the area.

The paper, entitled “US Force Posture Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region: An Independent Assessment,” suggests America is preparing for a possible conflict with China, one warship at a time.

The report was written by the Centre for Strategic and Independent Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based think tank. CSIS is a non-government body, but its assessment was commissioned by the US Defense Department.

The assessment provides extensive discussions with top US military personnel throughout the Pentagon’s Pacific Command.

The report was released on June 27, but only gained media coverage after its main authors – David Berteau and Michael Green – testified before the US House Armed Services Committee on August 1.

The report says the “geostrategic uncertainty the United States and its allies and partners face in the Asia Pacific region is how China’s growing power and influence will impact order and stability in the years ahead.”

The CSIS report approves of the repositioning and strengthening of US military forces on Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, which are strategically located in the Western Pacific. It also supports the stationing of combat ships in Singapore, which will be capable of intelligence gathering, special operations, and landing troops with armored vehicles.

The paper confirms that the US has held talks with Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam over possible access to military bases.

But it doesn’t stop there. Recommendations to prevent China’s reemergence as a great power go on and on.

The authors suggest placing a US nuclear aircraft carrier in Australia, doubling the number of nuclear attack submarines based in Guam, deploying combat ships to South Korea, and upgrading anti-missile defenses in Japan, South Korea, and Guam.

The report also suggests permanently basing a bomber squadron on Guam as well as boosting both manned and unmanned surveillance in the region. Moreover, it promotes boosting US army ground presence, including stationing 2,500 more marines in Australia.

The recommendations coincide with the Obama administration’s “Asia Pivot.” It’s a plan to boost US military presence throughout the Asia-Pacific Region, and to back almost all of China’s rivals whilst doing so.

And the government has most certainly accomplished its goal. Just last week, the Pentagon announced it would conduct surveillance drone missiles over a Pacific island chain which have become a point of tension between China and Japan – who the US has deep military ties to.

Washington has also been a firm supporter of the Philippines during its ongoing dispute with China in the South China Sea since April, when a standoff began over ownership of the Scarborough Reef.

Since the disagreement kicked off, Washington has stepped up its military presence in the region. The move angered Beijing, which claims the presence of US naval ships hinders vital shipping lanes which China relies on for energy and raw materials.

If America makes the report’s suggestions a reality, the decision could have far-reaching implications for Washington’s allies, making them vulnerable to attacks in the future.

And if the US aims to strengthen its ties with Asia-Pacific countries in order to squash China, the question remains whether those island nations will actually comply.


Comments (46)

drew93 14.12.2012 02:18

ok all of that sounds boges and for any anti-america guys saying were the threat WE CREATED THE NUKE you copyed us and made plans to use them aginst us and we have the middle east who hate are way of life if you dont like us to dam bad cause us americans will never give up if any forgien power steps on our land then and only then should you worry about america blowing stuff up we take threats and papagonda then were call imperilist as china is under the table plotting aginst us to lay an invasion that will only fail and awake the sleeping giant once more but at a cost 100x the other ww and we all will have nuclar flavored water famine from radition. population mass downsized . ohh a bunch of corparates siting back laughing at us ALL   if you truely want peace .hatered and war should not be accepted

0

Undo

shailesh (unregistered) 10.09.2012 14:51

lot of things said and written. Everyone claims US has more funding to defense as much as 4 timesthat of china. Please consider the defense budget as per PPP. The world of figures would be upside down. Ask US to manufacture one Chinese plane or submarine and vice versa and see what the cost difference is and than all u need to do is consider that difference to the overall budget and rethink. US is putting in billions of dollars in new tech and china is just stealing it for free . add that to the budget too and to your amazement china is spending more on defense than what US is doing

0

Undo

Orchard (unregistered) 05.09.2012 20:43

It is all about managing China's rise to power ...... as a Brit, from somewhere which was powerful once, and is now on the wane ...... I find the whole thing bizarre - who actually would want power? ...... What good did global hegemony ever do us? (and remember Britain in the 1880 was more powerful in it contemporary world than China and the US combined ....) All we got out of it was two massive wars which bankrupted the country, and cost millions their lives .... and to some extent are still being played out in India / Pakistan and the Middle East (after the collapse of the Ottomans following WW1, where they made the mistake of siding with Germany).
I just can't see why any country would actually want to be the biggest kid in the school playground ..... it may play well to the nationalists at home, but is ultimately a complete cowpat of a political strategy, and really shows that the cupboard of ideas to inspire a populace is completely bare.
The Germans have now nailed the peaceful rise to power, (after trying tub thumping nationalism twice).  Even with the Euro crisis I would much rather live here, where we have learned the lessons of the danger of expansionist nationalism good and proper than watching two stateswhoshouldknowb etter bickering over some barren rocks in the middle of nowhere.
The Chinese and US Governments should be absolutely ashamed of themselves and should be peddling much more inspirational idealogies to their populations than this dangerous bag of baloney.

0

Undo

View all comments (46)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us