US: Iran a year away from nukes, strike 'not off the table'

Published time: December 20, 2011 17:36
Edited time: December 20, 2011 21:47
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gestures as he prepares to depart Tripoli, December 17, 2011 (Reuters / Pablo Martinez Monsivais / Pool)

Washington is not ruling out a military operation against Tehran if it gets wind of an Iranian nuke program, declared US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. The US believes Iran could develop a nuclear bomb in under a year.

­Just two weeks ago, Panetta discouraged Israel from attacking Iran in the wake of a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which raised concerns that the Iranian nuclear program was veering off the civilian path. But on Monday, Panetta told CBS that the military option “was not off the table” if the US learns of nuclear weapons being built in Iran.

The United States does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us and that's a red line, obviously, for the Israelis,” the US Defense Secretary told CBS in a preview of “60 Minutes.”

If they proceed, and we get intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps necessary to stop it,” he added.

Iran has accumulated enough material and technology to assemble a nuclear bomb in about one year, added the US Defense Secretary. If Tehran has a "hidden facility somewhere,” Panetta says, that could speed up the process.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak expressed similar determination, saying Tel Aviv and Washington would do whatever it takes to obstruct Iran’s nuclear intentions.

"Our two countries clearly believe that a nuclear Iran is neither conceivable nor acceptable,” Barak told Israeli public radio on Sunday.  

Though earlier this month Barak ruled out a strike on Iran, in Sunday's interview he reiterated “the fact that we must not take any option off the table."

Iran denies the pursuit of any military objective in enriching uranium. But according to a leaked April 2010 US Department of Defense assessment of Iran's military capability, the veil of mystery over its nuclear plans plays to Tehran’s advantage. As Iran’s military can only afford the defense, the uncertainty Iran keeps up around the nuke question is a part of a “deterrent strategy” the country has adopted in the face of “external or ‘hard’ threats from the US and Israel.

Meanwhile, American and European diplomats met in Italy on Tuesday to discuss further sanctions on the Persian country. The meeting was joined by Canada, Australia, Japan, and South Korea, and sought to halt Iran’s alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. The group has called for further pressure on Iran, until the country restarts peace talks with the international community. The statement comes despite the fact that the Iranian envoy to the UN has offered to allow IAEA officials to visit the county in order to solve any outstanding problems.

Comments (60)

xlx 30.12.2011 15:18

cant Russia or someone else give the Iranians a nuclear weapon please? So all this war mongering would be over. I dont believe they try to build one but they should get one from another country like Russia. They cant use it anyway, that would be suicide, and i think Iran is that intelligent for sure

0

Undo

Dan (unregistered) 23.12.2011 20:14

It's not even a decade since the beginning of the Iraq war and the great lies told to start that war, and they expect us to believe the government again? Not happening.

We have to get Ron Paul in as president so we can stop this suicidal and homicidal foreign policy of the DC establishment. Washington D.C. is the real enemy.

0

Undo

fine2opine 21.12.2011 16:14

fine2opine...huh? wrote in #4
fine2opin e That scenario is the Zionist NWO one. Iran is the last true remaining anti NWO outpost. It has been able to survive all attempts to destroy it because of the FAITH of its brave people. Fact is all evil comes to an end... the blood sucking zionists, banksters, devil-worshipping murderers will be absolutely destroyed. Their time is up. Now you can take that to the bank! Hello. Not sure why this person (who is NOT ME) would place a post under my handle (Fine2opine) as 'fine2opine..huh?' and then type words that I did not write and foist them out there as my own. The above comments were not made by me and do not represent my views.

+1

Undo

View all comments (60)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us