Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Global 'water war' threat by 2030 - US intelligence

Published time: March 22, 2012 19:57
Edited time: March 22, 2012 23:57
The Mekong river. One of the predicted sources of international conflict and site for controversial dam. (Reuters / Samrang Pring)

The Mekong river. One of the predicted sources of international conflict and site for controversial dam. (Reuters / Samrang Pring)

Nations will cut off rivers to prevent their enemies having access to water downstream, terrorists will blow up dams, and states that cannot provide water for their citizens will collapse. This is the future - as painted by a top US security report.

­The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the organization that oversees US intelligence agencies such as the CIA and FBI, was commissioned by President Barack Obama to examine the impact of water scarcity worldwide on US security.

And while the prospect of “water wars” has been touted for decades, it may start to become reality within a decade. The ODNI predicts that by 2040 water demand will outstrip current supply by 40 per cent.

­Impoverished volatile states will be worst off

Water shortages “will hinder the ability of key countries to produce food and generate energy, posing a risk to global food markets and hobbling economic growth.” North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia will be hit the hardest, the report states.

And while the coming shortage is a manageable problem for richer countries, it is a deadly “destabilizing factor” in poorer ones. As a rule, economically disadvantaged countries are already prone to political, social and religious turmoil, and failure to provide water for farmers and city dwellers can be the spark for wider “state failure.”

Among those most vulnerable to this scenario are Sudan, Pakistan and Iraq, which are all locked in debilitating civil conflicts, and Somalia, which has effectively ceased to function as a state. ODNI envisages countries restricting water for its own citizens to “pressure populations and suppress separatist elements.” The report predicts many ordinary citizens will have to resort to the kind of purification tablets currently used by soldiers and hikers to obtain clean water.

Most dangerously, there are whole clusters of unstable countries fighting for the same waterways.

The report lists the Nile, which runs through Uganda, Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt, the Jordan, which runs through Israel and several Arab countries, and the Indus, which is shared by Pakistan and India.

These areas are managed by special commissions, and the report states that “historically, water tensions have led to more water-sharing agreements than violent conflicts.” But once there is not enough water to go around, these fragile pacts may collapse, with “more powerful upstream nations impeding or cutting off downstream flow.”

Even without outright fighting, the ODNI says countries will use water as a tool of political leverage, similar to how gas and oil are used today.

Infrastructure projects will become increasingly politicized: “States will also use their inherent ability to construct and support major water projects to obtain regional influence or preserve their water interests,” the report claims.

Laos’ proposed $3.5 billion Mekong Dam has already been the subject of an international dispute with Cambodia and Vietnam, who say the dam will obliterate their fisheries and agriculture.

­Water terrorism threat

And even international compromise is not likely to be enough to ensure water safety.

“Physical infrastructure, including dams, has been used as a convenient and high-publicity target by extremists, terrorists, and rogue states, threatening substantial harm and this will become more likely beyond the next 10 years.”

The report states that an attack on a single point in a water supply, such as a canal or desalinization plant is sufficient to deprive hundreds of thousands of clean water. In return, governments will have to implement costly safety measures that are likely to be of limited use, due to the extensive length of rivers that have to be protected.

The ODNI says there is a decade to tackle the problems before they spiral out of control. It suggests revising international water treaties and investing in superior water purification technologies that will make the increasingly scarce resource plentiful again.

Comments (5)


Meg Stout 17.02.2014 15:26

Remember that 93% of water consumption worldwide goes to food. By choosing your diet carefully, you can change your food-related water consumption drastically. Drink water when you can (an equivalent volume of soda requires over 300 times as much water to produce), load up on fresh veggies and fruits (juiced stuff "costs" much more in water units), minimize grain carbs (each ounce of grain costs hundreds of cups of water), and stick with soy, milk, chicken and fish for your protein (beef "costs" an order of magnitude more in water than an equivalent portion of chicken or eggs).


Jonny Vincent 08.01.2014 13:21

Marc1 24.03.2012 13:26

That's what's all about, people; Total Privatization of life on Planet Earth, - meaning, Total Enslavement. And who's behind this; the greatest robbery ever of peoples' assets - so called Privatization? Jewish Zionist Bankers, of course and their obsequious servants, the "Free" Masons who control the police and the military. And they dare call it a democracy.


Who dared call it that? Who said you were free? Who framed your perception of the world for you? Who told you demented lies to rot your mind like: "God is good"? "Truth is rude"?

Slaves are bred, not made.


Jonny Vincent 08.01.2014 13:13

2cents 24.03.2012 15:55

Now u see the Bush family's agenda for buying 200,000 acres in Paraguay sitting on top of South America's largest natural aquafer. Everything is by design.



I'm not sure whether it's a good or a bad thing that they are so clearly in control. How many people even know the official name of CIA HQ?

It's in Langley but why wouldn't they call it The National Center for Intelligence or something...American ? Named after the son of a undisputed traitor guilty of treason.

[quote]Kin gs love their treason but the traitor they hate.[/quote]

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us