Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


‘Europe’s bargaining position weakens amid Russia-China gas deal talks'

Published time: May 19, 2014 10:43
AFP Photo/ Andrey Sinitsin

While Europe searches for alternative energy resources and partners to decrease its dependence on Russia, its bargaining position is weakening with China and Russia about to sign a historic gas deal, professor of political economy Jeffrey Sommers told RT.

RT: China and Russia are expected to sign a historical gas deal. How much could it change the energy market dynamics in the region?

Jeffrey Sommers: I don’t think consequences will be all that extreme for Europe. If we take a kind of long view on this, the Germans, the French and the Russians have been looking to have better relations with each other and increase partnerships since the 1970s and they more or less have done that. The US is trying to interfere with that as much as it can but not always with success. Given the situation in Ukraine, we already have business leaders both in Germany and France saying that ultimately we can expect many more difficulties in terms of long range relations with Russia. As far as the gas deal goes between China and Russia, the only thing that it might do with regards to Europe is to leave Europe with a little bit less bargaining power over prices for gas, so Russia's position is a little bit stronger vis-à-vis Europe when it comes to bargaining future contract prices for gas. That said, the Russian position is going to be just a little bit weaker in the negotiations with China over prices because they know that Russia wants to collude a deal as quickly as possible, so that they do not have to be so dependent on the European market of gas.

RT: Is it fair to say that with China becoming a major importer of Russian gas, Europe could lose some of its leverage when dealing with Moscow on gas issues?

Former British diplomat William Mallinson on the Chinese-Russian gas deal: “These negotiations have been going on well over ten years. If [the contract] is signed, it will obviously make Gazprom less reliant on profits of European markets. This will put it [Russia] in a stronger position because Europe will still need cheaper Russian gas than for example, American LNG, liquefied, which is extremely expensive and the Americans would love to sell it to Europe. So it actually makes Russia even more independent than it already is and less reliant on the European markets.”

JS: Absolutely. I do not think it is going to be huge, but certainly they will lose some leverage. The anticipated amounts of exports to China are going to be something in the order of about half of what Europe imports currently, so that is a substantial amount of gas. So it is certainly going to weaken the position of Europe in terms of bargaining, no doubt.

RT: So Europe threatens to slap trade sanctions, Russia goes to China. Is there any connection here do you think?

JS: Yes and no, this deal between China and Russia has been one that has been talked about for a full decade, so there is no surprise that there has been an ongoing negotiation. I think the timing in terms of finally concluding the deal is definitely related to the issue of proposed trade sanctions against Russia by some European states. Now, this is actually disadvantageous for Russia, just a small amount, marginally, in terms of its negotiations with China, not much, but it is a disadvantage; Europe is going forward in terms of their negotiations over gas prices.

RT: How much does Europe need Russian energy resources?

JS: They have been decreasing their imports of Russian gas, they are going to be moving towards renewable resources of energy. They have also begun importing natural gas from Algeria, they are also looking to identify new sources of natural gas in the North Sea. And of course they are also talking about fracking on the continent. The importance of Russia for European gas imports is actually declining somewhat but it is still very important. Then the US is talking about liquefying its natural gas and then exporting it to Europe, but all that said, Europe still depends on Russian gas; they cannot just cut themselves off in a short term. The demands for gas are just too great for that.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Comments (29)


Regula 01.06.2014 09:37

Chris Makey 23.05.2014 03:39

Haha. Russia sold out their resources like a cheap hooker with a disease. Just imagine the value of gas in a decade let alone twenty years from now.


Ru ssia isn't selling out. The price for gas to China is pegged to the price of oil. Which means if oil prices rise - which they will, or the US fracking of oil will become a loss business! - gas prices will also rise. It will give the EU a better bargaining position, but if the EU buys US gas, either the US will have to drastically lower its price or Russia will increase its price. The EU risks to be sandwiched.


guardmeercat 01.06.2014 08:36

The EU's bargain position don't only weakens! But if they are stupid enough to follow the US, like the Lapdogs the EU leaders seems to be, it's only a question of time before they have lost the posibility to bargain, all together! And with thetime aspect and the higher prices on all US solutions, the EU's allready strained economy, are heading to a place, where the sun never shines!


Regula 22.05.2014 12:06

The US has Ukraine's resources - maybe. The Ukraine saga isn't finished yet. It may turn out like Afghanistan, Iraq: popular uprising, rising anti-Americanism due to the austerity and in time a turn to the left to nationalize resources as in Venezuela.

The US may want to send its tracking companies and sell the gas to the EU to outmaneuver Russia. Possible. But don't forget that shale gas extraction is more expensive and that the infrastructure, the pipelines need replacement. So it isn't likely to be a better deal for the EU and they may want to stay with Russia as being politically more stable.

View all comments (29)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us