Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​‘US will accept any Egyptian authority that controls the territory’

Published time: June 22, 2014 22:43
Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi (R) and US Secretary of State John Kerry talk before a meeting at the Presidential Palace on June 22, 2014, in the capital Cairo. (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowski)

The US will turn blind eye to any human rights violations and the questionable legitimacy of General Sisi’s government as long as it has firm control in Egypt, Lawrence Davidson, professor of history at West Chester University, told RT.

Washington remains eager to work with its key Middle Eastern ally, Egypt, despite concerns over widespread human rights abuses and limits on freedom of expression under new leader, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, US Secretary of State, John Kerry, said on Sunday.

Kerry arrived to Cairo a day after an Egyptian court confirmed death sentences against 183 members of the Muslim Brotherhood, which supports ousted president, Mohammed Morsi.

Kerry: US ‘not responsible’ for crisis in Iraq, Libya

But the US official, instead, decided to focus on the “few flickering signs of positive movement” in recent weeks, including the release of an Al Jazeera journalist, steps to start addressing sexual violence against women and Sisi’s call for the revision of human rights law.

“This is a critical moment of transition in Egypt (with) enormous challenges,” Kerry is cited by Reuters.

Lawrence Davidson, professor of Middle East history at West Chester University says the US is almost always playing the ball with whoever can establish their sovereignty over the territory.

RT: Looks like Egypt's new leader has just got a powerful ally, hasn't he?

Lawrence Davidson: The Obama administration has wanted to resume military aid to Egypt for months now. And the problem for them has been the position taken by Senator Patrick Leahy, who is a very high-ranking Democratic senator and head of one of the Appropriations Committees that passes on funds for foreign aid. And Leahy says: ‘You know, this Egyptian government is illegitimate and we shouldn’t be funding them.’

So, there’s a bit of a problem, actually. Kerry is probably in Egypt now, trying to get Sisi to do something that would suggest lightening on the opposition. And if he can get Sisi to do that – then he can argue in the Senate that: ‘You know, you got rule of the law in Egypt’ and the Senators would then clear the way for full military aid to resume. But I don’t think Sisi is going to do that.

Egyptian troops stand guard outside the high constitutional court in the capital Cairo on June 7, 2014 (AFP Photo / Khaled Desouki)

RT: Does it matter who's in charge? We had ex-Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton cozying up to then-leader Mohammed Morsi, who was ousted by Sisi's army. John Kerry also came out in support of Morsi at the time. So which side is America really on?

LD: America is on the side of whoever can establish their sovereignty over the territory; the authority over Egypt. If you’ve got a stable government in Egypt then the Americans will play ball with it.

But there’s an argument about whether in fact this government is legitimate. The executive, the presidency says “Yes, now it’s legitimate.” It has established control over the territory and in needs to fight “terrorists” coming of the Sinai. Leahy and the Senate says “that’s just false, you’ve got a coup, you’ve got a military dictatorship. They’re suppressing all kinds of opposition. They’re condemning masses of people to execution.”

RT: Kerry spoke of upholding the rule of law. But what about the US turning a blind eye to the hundreds of Muslim Brotherhood members sentenced to death for rioting. The concern is that it's heavy-handed sentencing, and that their convictions are somewhat political?

LD: Again, the Department of State and the President ultimately will accept the government that controls the territory. That’s always been the American position. They’ll recognize a government as long as it controls territory. Actually, the only exception to that was the Bolshevik government in 1917, but we won’t go into that. But you’ve got this guy in the Senate, who is very powerful, very well positioned and he has the ability to stop the funding that facilitates foreign aid. And he says: “No.”

Comments (5)

 

Dunbal 23.06.2014 09:15

* Provided said authority does exactly what the US wants.

 

3150dixi 23.06.2014 08:46

There are many countries prostituting themselves to the USA EGYPT is just one of them!

 

Ron Smith 23.06.2014 05:45

No doubt John "Get the checkbook" Kerry is preparing to spend (throw away) another 15 billion of American taxpayer dollars on something nobody wants or cares about.

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us