Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Eurovision song contest becomes ‘political and cultural irrelevance’

Published time: January 13, 2014 01:29

Denmark's Emmelie de Forest raises her prize next to her team after winning the final of the 2013 Eurovision Song Contest in Malmoe, Sweden, on May 19, 2013 (AFP Photo)

Download video (31.69 MB)

In a time of austerity, countries that have ditched the Eurovision think that the once a year “infomercial of poor taste pop” has turned into a “political and cultural irrelevance,” Srdja Trifkovic, foreign affairs editor of Chronicles Magazine, told RT.

RT: Your country, Serbia, is one of the countries turning down Eurovision participation this year, why is that?

Srdja Trifkovic: Because the Eurovision Song Contest has become a political as well as a cultural irrelevance. Back in the 1990s, it suddenly became much more important in central and eastern Europe than it used to be, because many newly independent countries of the former Yugoslavia and the former USSR wanted to put their name on the panel so to speak and it was the period where Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan and others jumped on the bandwagon.

But for many, many years in musical terms, in artistic terms it has been a rather worthless contest and nowadays both politically and culturally its significance has declined. So in a period of austerity, in a period when modest resources have to be matched against almost unlimited requirements, I believe that this decision was made by so many countries because they have concluded that the Eurovision Song Contest simply doesn’t matter.

RT: But some say that wining and subsequently hosting Eurovision can provide a boost for the country’s image as well as its tourism. Isn’t it worth the sacrifice to at least invest in some of these two factors to carry on and be part of Eurovision?

ST: Well, I believe the experts who know more about this than I do, have tried to correlate the benefits versus the cost and have come to the conclusion that to have once a year an infomercial connected with poor taste popular pop or simple weirdness.

RT: What about the countries who do take part in this competition, do you think the crisis or the austerity and bailouts could affect the way people vote? It’s been said sometimes that people vote differently because of the political side of things?

ST: Well, we’ve seen political voting all along. For instance, Cyprus and Greece awarded each other 12 points, while giving zero to Turkey. The Scandinavians in particular are notorious. The Swedes and Norwegians giving Denmark 12 and visa-versa, and also Finland and Estonia help each other...

So there is no real correlation between voting patterns and the quality of the entries themselves. And as I have already said that quality can be pretty dismal most of the time. And even that one global hit that emerged from the Eurovision Song Contest, Abba’s Waterloo, from 1974, is just a typical example of cheesy tra-la-la europop.

Comments (5)


Eaftomou Krymmeno 21.01.2014 18:43

So, the big political problem of ESC seems to be that Greece and Cyprus use to award each other the 12 points ... Very "big", indeed ... But that seems to be no problem that all of the Slavic countries use to award each other with the highest number of points, especially those ones from the former Yugoslavia or those from the former Soviet block ... And either that the FYROM awards no or just few points to Greece ... Poor Greece has a firend, Cyprus (imagine why), and that's porbably why it could afford to gain such high ranking for the last decade in all of the yearly ESC ...


Jason Ranford 14.01.2014 18:28

One global hit? What about Volare, What's Another Year, Ooh Aah Just A Little Bit, Save Your Kisses For Me, Hold Me Now, All Kinds Of Everything, Puppet On A String, Euphoria, A Little Peace, Congratulations etc. they were global hits. Maybe it's a good idea for countries only to participate when they can afford to. The only reason this man is slagging Eurovision off is because Serbia failed to qualify for the final last year. sour grapes comes to mind.


god 14.01.2014 10:57

Good if you were five, always good for a Laugh but, $hit happens and, we move on to the next big thing.

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us