Israel’s rocket test gives Obama his Cuban missile moment
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013, the world awoke to a confused and contradictory story of two 'missile tests' off the coast of Syria. First came denials, then a series of contradictions from the US Defense Department, Navy and Israeli Defense Force.
Eventually the 'joint US/Israeli exercise' featuring Israeli 'unarmed decoy missiles' line emerged.
This unannounced 'exercise', while the region is on a hair trigger for war, paints a picture of a US president who has lost the initiative to his so-called allies. Israeli hawks are itching to shoot, annoyed by British, US and French democratic checks and balances. So the war hawks of Zion bare their talons, screech, and expect their US allies to cover their rear.
Letting missiles loose toward the Syrian coast on Tuesday was not a test, it was an Israeli provocation. In the few minutes these 'Sparrows' were whizzing toward Syria, President Assad's military had to decide whether or not to retaliate. If it were the German-designed guided missile destroyers or submarines that fired the missiles they are lucky not to be at the bottom of the Mediterranean.
Some of the older among us are experiencing deja vu. Fifty years
ago during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, America and the Soviet
Union peered over the edge of the nuclear abyss. US hawks were
urging the president to invade Cuba before Khrushchev's nuclear
missiles arrived. Kennedy wisely demurred and it later emerged
tactical nuclear weapons were primed and ready for US troops had
they tried it on.
At the height of the Cuban crisis, 4am on Friday October 26, US
Strategic Air Command (SAC) inexplicably launched an Atlas ICBM
from California's Vandenberg Air Force Base straight toward
SAC knew the Soviet military would be bracing themselves for the
first nuclear strike since Nagasaki and might choose to retaliate
against North America before the Atlas arrived. When the Atlas
dropped into the sea, Kennedy was finally told. A bemused and
disturbed president issued direct orders prohibiting ANY further
This vicious tomfoolery is precisely what President Dwight D.
Eisenhower meant when he warned in his closing address on January
17, 1961 that "In the councils of government, we must guard
against the acquisition of unwarranted influence ... by the
military industrial complex." The former general feared for
any president who'd never been a soldier.
There can be lots of money in making war. It's an international protection racket. If you have a tame media and can't find a good reason to fight ... any old cock-and-bull story will do.
Obama's 'Little Syria' reminds of Kennedy's 'Little Cuba'
The more fingers holding down triggers, buttons pressed and war-fighting supercomputer mice clicked, the more replenishment orders roll in and share prices edge up in real time. Since ‘Dr. Strangelove’ was made Commanding Officer those dividends just keep rolling in.
So after Jack Kennedy's 'Little Cuba', how will Obama get on with 'Little Syria' and who are the main characters? The continent is different, but the stakes are the same, both sides look to be backed by unspeakable nuclear arsenals.
This time Zionist fundamentalist Benjamin Netanyahu has taken the
role of Joker in the pack, straight out of Gotham City. A war
crime is not a war crime and the UN Security Council is hooey
when you're on a mission from God. Here the NATO zone mainstream
media has truly missed a trick: it’s not Yahweh, but one-eyed
Wotan that floats Bibi's boat.
So if the war crime orders really do come, let's hope Obama's
ballistic missile security is up to scratch and whoever gives the
illegal order is arrested rather than buttons being pressed. The
signs are not good though: 341st Missile Wing's Colonel David
Lynch in Montana was relieved of his command last month after his
Malmstrom ICBM Air Force base in Montana failed its safety test.
The covert war, the arming and training of the Syrian rebels, is all but lost. Now, if the NATO-Israeli alliance openly attacks Syria, there can and will be no repeating the lies and delusions of Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq or Libya. This time the people have spoken loud and clear in Britain, through the House of Commons.
If our so-called leaders travel any further down this bloody road
to Damascus they will be declaring war not just on Syria, Iran
and Russia, but on their own populations. While arms
manufacturers BAe Systems and EADS share price might show a
temporary spike, that is a war they can only lose.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.