Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Breaking bad: Separatists or pioneers of the future for microstates?

Patrick L Young is expert in global financial markets working in multiple disciplines, ranging from trading independently to running exchanges.

Published time: March 25, 2014 09:42
Demonstrators take part in a pro-independence rally in Princes Street gardens in Edinburgh, Scotland September 22, 2012. (Reuters)

The analog world favored big multinationals, whether states or corporations. The digital age prizes decentralized flexibility creating an agenda for independence within the EU.

With remarkable hubris and little grasp of the future, Prime Minister David Cameron (who apparently will renegotiate Britain’s stance with the EU) embodied the high-water mark for the supranational body last year when in Astana, Kazakhstan, he memorably waxed lyrical on the idea of the EU stretching “from the Atlantic to the Urals” on the very day Croatia became the 28th member.

Little more than a year later and we have reached another watershed moment. It is increasingly clear that the old analogue world centered on massive lumps of population (EU/USSR etc). However, our digital future favors the microscopic computing power underpinning nanotechnology and indeed the microstate. In the old days everybody wanted an empire. Nowadays, nations leading in best practice are tiny: Estonia, Iceland or Dubai for instance.

The digital age favors nimble nation states, generating growth through bottom up entrepreneurial endeavors, as opposed to old discredited nation states bestowing support inefficiently while promoting that old big state oxymoron: centralized innovation. While multinationals (corporate and political alike) seek to control the future, citizens are increasingly ignoring the memo.

Government serves a limited purpose which the west has long since overstepped. Ancient Rome ran on a political maxim of minimal intervention: ‘panem et circenses’ (bread and circuses). Citizens naturally seek a simple legal basis enabling property rights and opportunity which inspire diligence and savings through a progressive system. Unfortunately in the rush to embrace an ever broadening mandate of political correctness, government has become a parody of common sense.

General view of the port of Monaco (Reuters)

Citizens are disillusioned

Eurocrats disdain the nation states seeing glory only in a single European homogeneity - which always strikes me as a bit like claiming to be creating an Aryan race, but apparently this isn’t what Brussels means at all… However, within many regions, citizens are realizing their national governments are impotent and Brussels’ control freaks are aloof to the mass unemployment created by their plutocratic Euro currency delusion.

Perhaps the unemployed of Spain should seek their own version of the flawed ‘humanitarian intervention’ doctrine, given how Brussels is more obsessed with Ukraine than the problems Europe has created with its flawed single currency. One result could be more states brought about by popular will as opposed to the bizarre political whims which created Europe’s tobacco-smuggling epicenter, Kosovo.

Regions with a mercantile bent seek liberation from the onerous tax burdens which renders the progressive regressive. Enterprise powerhouse Catalonia is a thriving economic nation constrained within the Spanish bureaucracy. Citizens exasperated by Madrid’s rule have scheduled a self-determination referendum for November 9. Meanwhile Venice, once a great independent power and to this day a hub of Italy’s economic strength, has just completed an online referendum in which 89 percent voted to abandon the deeply compromised Roman Republic that Italy has become.

Thus in a world where there is a push for ever greater taxes on those aspiring to build for their future, the socialist charge of the EU is being compromised from within as multiple states vote for independence, abandoning the big state high tax model. There are also those who wish to emulate the collapsing Venezuelan socialist model with the Bolivarian republic of Scotland an option come September. Good luck to them. The key is that small regions have the right to self-determination in an era when the nation state (let alone the EU) is failing them.

Where before states were being hewn from often violent breakdowns such as Yugoslavia, the new wave sweeping Europe peacefully seek a path to independent prosperity, predominantly driven by alienation from big, remote government.

The limits to wealth destruction by high taxes and an over-reach of regulation are promoting an independence movement which may yet stretch across the points of the EU’s compass.

Digital states are best when small and nimble: the world’s wealthiest nations are increasingly at the smaller end of the scale. Singapore transformed from predominantly swampland to a dazzling technopolis in a generation thanks to enabling upward mobility, enshrining property rights, access to education and work while rewarding entrepreneurship. Monaco melds strong welfare with zero income tax.

Ultimately, the supranational ethos of ‘big’ whether government or corporate, is undermined by the power of the smaller state to exploit the ability to be digital, flexible and prosperous. That is good for citizens and great for empowering both individuals and the community to shape their prosperous destiny.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Comments (22)

 

Michael Tyler Daniels 16.04.2014 05:21

This writer is brilliant but completely propagandist at the same time digital states ok lets think people not to be that guy but we created the internet in the US do you not think at all we might have thought about this going against us? Peace that's what I want and the writer of this doesn't want that.

 

DoAskDoTell 08.04.2014 14:21

Larger and larger nations (most concentrated power and least ownership/accountabi lity) are Now very susceptible to

corruption s power of Monopoly, Oligopoly Multinationals and IMF/WB Oligarchs... and their mercenaries armies of lawyers+thugs...

It takes strong intelligent leaders with integrity, self-restraint and understanding of common people to lead successfully a larger country.

For most of the planet, probably smaller is better? (more flexible, responsive, democratic management)

Will *local/regional/inte rnational* more important? Federal power to be limited in the personal sphere? in the new 21st century?

 

miguel villanueva 28.03.2014 21:49

that is correct its all never growing wealth or freedom that is slogans made up which are meaningless! yes we can/ obamas CHANGE/ G.W BUSH read my lips/ or his son little gorge/ you either WITH US OR AGANIST US right goerge im 110% against you & your hegmony you & your unit of skeemers pysops control freaks maybe those fools who believe that you help them that is just absurd & the heavens sees this injustice & total lies all lies from the so called jews impostors who are really kahzars race masters of american slaves! PERIOD!

View all comments (22)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us