Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Syria is a battle ground for Saudi Arabia’s confrontation with Iran over regional dominance

Published time: September 04, 2013 14:37
Soldiers of the Syrian government forces patrol on a tank in a devastated street on July 31, 2013 in the district of al-Khalidiyah in the central Syrian city of Homs (AFP Photo)

If the US and France start military action in Syria it will create “pockets” of Al- Qaeda-linked Islamic extremism across the country, and could trigger global conflict, Jeff Steinberg, senior editor of the Executive Intelligence Review, told RT.

RT: So, there are concerns that insurgent violence in Iraq could be linked to the civil war in Syria. Do you think there is a connection?

Jeff Steinberg:
Well, I think there is a connection both to the events on the ground in Syria, in Lebanon, in Egypt, and, quite frankly, for a month now the Saudi government has been pouring money into Sunni insurgence, who’ve been a major part of the violence and terrorism going on in Iraq. And it’s a part of a larger regional strategy, basically promoting a Sunni vs. Shia conflict, which has a big geo-political factor of Saudi Arabia competing with Iran for who’s going to be a dominant power in the Gulf region.

RT: Do you think there’s a danger that more countries of the region may be affected by what’s going on in south of Iraq and Syria?

JS: Very definitely. Already the situation in Iraq and Syria has spilt over very violently, inside Lebanon. There are not only Hezbollah fighters inside Syria fighting in conjunction with the Assad's government, but you now have Sunni radicals who have moved from Lebanon into Syria. And so you’ve got in effect a many civil war in Lebanon, playing out on Syrian territory, but very soon it’s likely to spill back over into Lebanon, which of course went through 15 years of a terrible civil war, sectarian violence from the mid 70-s into the early 90-s. 

A sniper of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), watches government positions during ongoing clashes with regime forces in the frontline neighborhood of Al Mtarall Adem on February 28, 2013 in Deir Ezzor. (AFP Photo)

RT: Iraq has seen some of the effect of the foreign intervention. How much, do you think, this affects Baghdad’s policy toward the calls for a strike on Syria?

JS: Well, I think that Iraq is in a kind of very delicate position. They, of course, border on Saudi Arabia; they know they’ve got a problem on Saudi funded insurgency inside their country. They have certain alliances, but not a kind of hard alliance with Iran, and they really struggle to get beyond the whole experience of several decades of war that guided much of the royal production and infrastructure. I think, they’re in a difficult position overall and I don’t think that they are driving faster in this battle. The al Qaeda, Sunni insurgence  operating inside the Iraq has now crossed over into Syria, so in a certain way, the violence that has picked up tremendously inside Iraq, is a kind of reverberation back there of the crisis centered in Syria. So I don’t think they’re major driving forces, but they certainly rid them of the spreading of the conflict across the entire region. 

RT: As we know, the Syrian opposition is pretty fragmented, there are several groups involved, including ones from Iraq, which may have a different agenda from kind of the mainstream opposition members. What do you think, we can expect from an end to the conflict, if there is an ultimate collapse of the Assad regime?

JS:  If you have a collapse of the Assad regime, and this is something that General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has been warning about for months. Then it’s likely that Syrian territory will be fragmented and there will be areas in the country, particularly along the Turkish and Lebanese borders and maybe in the South near the Jordanian border. And that will be “will pockets” of Al Qaeda linked Islamic extremism, and that poses a great danger to all of the bordering countries, of course. Israel has already carried out major bombing attacks against Syria and I think that we could very easily conceive a brake in stability in Syria, collapse of the regime into a kind of a wall-estate, that Israel would not sit back, but would intervene very forcefully and then you’ve got the seeds of a much-much bigger regional conflict that could draw the United States and, perhaps, even Russia in. This could go global and many people are very frightened of that danger.

Comments (16)

 

Aziz Sakhiezada 22.09.2013 12:59

It seems that the western nations are Isolating Iran in the region by establishing pro-western governments in the region so that Israel and the US could threaten Iran to abandon their nuclear ambitions,

 

nagyelme 07.09.2013 19:27

Igor Breakthru 04.09.2013 15:15 wrote " These analysis are so true but that's what the western forces want for a temporary solution in the middle east. The idea is to destabilize the region into factions & pretend to keep offering solutions in their favor to finally re-install another tyrant they would like to rule on their favor. That's what they call democracy."

God Igor, you finally comprehended it!!! What took you so long?

 

nagyelme 07.09.2013 19:22

Rob Fleck 04.09.2013 22:37 "Love watching Muslims kill Muslims"

In that case i look forward to watch you being knifed to death by a Muslim who read your racist idiotic remark. Just post your real address and name so we can all be entertained.

View all comments (16)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us