Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

‘More sanctions against Russia is mutually assured economic destruction’

Patrick L Young is expert in global financial markets working in multiple disciplines, ranging from trading independently to running exchanges.

Published time: April 18, 2014 14:37
US President Barack Obama (AFP Photo/Jim Watson)

At this juncture more sanctions is ultimately economic suicide, and mutually assured economic destruction, global financial markets expert Patrick Young told RT.

“The West is not remotely secure enough in its own economic recovery for the economy to actually withstand sanctions,” Patrick added.

“Stage one, stage two sanctions really don’t demand too much, they are the equivalent in naval warfare of firing a shot across the bows of another ship in order to warn them that there could be some other problems ahead,” he said.

On Thursday the President Barack Obama said that his administration is prepared to take further actions against Russia if the Geneva agreement concerning the crisis in Ukraine fails to bear fruit.

Patrick Young believes, the US is pursuing its own interests pressing with threats of more sanctions on Moscow.

“The big issue we have to look at here is the fact that America is very keen to impose more sanctions. Why? Because actually with the exception of one or two companies, such as Exxon, ultimately the US has very little interest directly in Russia at this time. Therefore, one could argue that it’s actually a politics of competitive economic advantage,” Young told RT.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (R) sits next to U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Europe Victoria Nuland during a meeting in Geneva, between representatives from Ukraine, the European Union, Russia and the U.S. on the crisis in Ukraine April 17, 2014. (Reuters/Alain Grosclaude)

In particular, Washington wants to have a better standing on the EU markets.

“If America can create sanctions, that would pull back the EU's interests in Russia and therefore allow America to have a better chance to get in subsequently when relations improve. Remember the key statistic for indirect investment [shows that] 75 percent of Russian overseas investment is coming from the EU according to the EU’s own statistics. That’s a huge number and therefore it’s quite obvious America doesn’t feel so much pain if it inflicts the sanctions,” he says.

However, Europe is much more vulnerable in regard to sanctions against Russia.

“Germany is a country having a huge percent of their exports going to Russia, they are going to feel the pain in the same as UK car manufacturers, who osend over so many Range Rovers to Moscow and Saint Petersburg. There are ultimately lots of industries in Europe that would be damaged here and they really cannot afford it given the crumbling edifice of the Eurozone put together by Brussels’ incompetent politicians,” Young says.

Meanwhile, some EU leaders are looking to block Russia’s South Stream gas pipeline project to solve the issue of supply disruptions via Ukraine and reliance on Russian energy resources. In this regard we can clearly see that the pendulum can swing in another direction, Patrick Young says.

A crew symbolically welding two pieces of South Stream gas pipeline together is seen on a huge screen during a ceremony to launch the construction the pipeline outside the Black Sea resort town of Anapa, on December 7, 2012. (AFP Photo)

“It’s in the face of Gazprom as an attempt to try to kill South Stream project so that the Americans can bring huge gas barges over to Western Europe in a hope that it would allow the Americans to make Europe more dependent on American gas.”

Patrick Young believes what the West has achieved so far is the ability to manage and dominate our 24 hour news cycle with all sorts of threats. Actually, in terms of achieving anything in order to manage to resolve any issues and in terms of actually impacting the economy overall, it has done nothing, he adds.

“All we have seen is a kind of unseemly scramble as some people have sought to try to reduce, in fear, their investments either in the West or in the East. But overall the impact has been incredibly muted,” Patrick Young concluded.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Comments (47)

 

Shahna 30.04.2014 15:33

"so that the Americans can bring huge gas barges over to Western Europe"

Uhm... is this supposed to be a real idea?
Because I don't think anyone could dream up a more expensive way for Europe to get it's gas than to ship it 6000 miles across the sea....

Bet ter they turn to solar stations on the Lagrange orbits.

 

Emmett 27.04.2014 04:03

John M. Wadsworth 21.04.2014 05:11



The U.S. will be the largest oil producer in the world in a few years. The U.S. could cut off all trade with Russia, and its oil and gas production in particular, and it would only represent about 2% of the U.S. GDP.

  


Th e US is on borrowed time. They're bankrupt now and don't have a few years to TRY to be the largest energy producer. Also, that's a claim, not a certainty. That is why US want to control & dominate natural resources of other nations now. As soon as other nations stop the use of petrodollars the US will be done, finished, kaput.

 

Norberto Triemstra 23.04.2014 12:56

Organizing another world war is not out of the question in order to solve this problem, it has been done before....

View all comments (47)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us