Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Church, activists at odds over bill on insults to believers

Published time: October 19, 2012 09:47
Edited time: October 19, 2012 13:47
(Reuters / Sergei Karpukhin)

(Reuters / Sergei Karpukhin)

The Public Chamber’s resolution on the draft bill on protection of believers’ feelings “does not reflect the community’s opinion,” a senior cleric of the Russian Orthodox Church has claimed.

The resolution ignores the necessity to introduce criminal responsibility for desecration of the “revered objects, signs and emblems of worldview,” as well as tightening of responsibility for insulting the believers’ feelings, reads the letter to the Public Chamber by Vsevolod Chaplin, the head of the Church and society relations department of the Moscow Patriarchy.

Chaplin called upon the members of the chamber not to vote for the current draft of the resolution and to create a special commission in order to thoroughly rework the document.

The reply from the Church official came after the Public Chamber criticized the bill for suggesting introducing criminal responsibility for “public insults to rites and ceremonies of the religious organizations preaching the religions that are inseparable part of the historical heritage of the peoples of the Russian Federation.

The activists noted that the current Russian law had no definition of the inseparable part of historical heritage and this allowed discrimination of a certain group of citizens.

Additionally, the term “religious beliefs and feelings” lacks precise definition, the resolution reads.

In general, the Public Chamber supported the very idea of the bill, but stressed that it needs corrections.

Chaplin countered in his letter that the Russian Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Unions mentions Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Judaism as religions that comprise an inseparable part of historical heritage. He said that the equality in basic rights of religious unions did not contradict to “various degree of respect to different religious traditions and different levels of support and protection.”

The cleric claimed that the term “insult to religious feelings” needs no additional definition as it is now used widely and commonly, along with “national strife” and others.

The bill introducing criminal responsibility for insults to religious feelings was submitted to the Lower House in late September. The bill was backed jointly by all four parliamentary factions and chances of its approval are very high.

In its current form the bill suggests to punish those who insult religious feelings of Russian citizens with up to three years in prison, fines of up to 300,000 rubles (under $10,000) or by up to 200 hours of correctional labor.Desecration of holy objects carries tougher punishment of up to five years in prison.

The move came after a string of scandals which the Church calls a prepared and orchestrated attack. The best known is the “punk prayer” by the Pussy Riot band in the main cathedral of Moscow. Others included media reports of clergy’s lush lifestyle and criticism of the church’s attempts to regulate secular issues, in particular school programs.

Comments (3)

 

Derek Maher 31.03.2014 21:48

There are enough laws passed by the parliament governing society without clerics getting into the act.
What next. Burning heretic's at the stake. Having religious courts? etc.

 

Joshua 16.11.2013 19:28

God is everything that is 'Right' or 'Wrong'. He is a set of Universal laws that cannot be changed.

Go d gave us the right to choose and we even argue with god as he backs down and lets us have our way. We place Leaders over us and then complain about the slavery and controlled enviroment instead of getting rid of the leaders and working together as groups to make choices.

We get manipulated into thiking violence is good, and judging others is good, and controlling everyone elses life is good. When they are Wrong.

We live in an Artifical world because God's world is flawed in our eyes.

We punish ourselves.

_

 

Joshua 16.11.2013 19:20

Seriously? (unregistered) 22.10.2012 01:04

let God punish them, as he did with the Flood. It only shows that even he (If exists) did not do a very good job creating humans, then he regrated it and kill them all ( ecxept Noah). Next time he should srhink harder who he will save..We are too evil................ ..... & nbsp;  Seriously.

  


He is a loving and understanding god who gave us that choice to choose. He does not want to rule over our choices. He did the flood to save us, not punish us.

To know god or what "god" is, you need to first know yourself. :)

Is god stupid?

_

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us