Anniversary of Soviet Union’s most generous gift
Published: 19 February, 2010, 19:01
Edited: 25 February, 2010, 13:01
RIA Novosti / Alexandr Moklechov, STF
TAGS: Anniversary, Conflict, Meeting, Russia, Ukraine, History
Russian activists in Crimea have held a mourning rally to mark the date when Nikita Khrushchev formally gave the Black Sea republic to Ukraine.
“Nikita, What have you done?” was the rhetorical question written on placards with the Soviet leader’s photo which were burnt in a symbolic gesture by members of pro-Russian organizations.
They gathered in front of Russia’s consulate in Simferopol, the capital of the autonomous Crimean republic, waving flags and holding banners, RIA Novosti reports.
“Crimean Russians are not separatists. We have been living on our native land for centuries,” some of the slogans read.
However, some Ukrainian officials are of a different opinion and believe the activists are nothing but “pro-Russian separatists”.
“There is no doubt Crimea belongs to Ukraine,” MP Taras Stetskiv told news website Novy Region when commenting on the event. “If Russia thinks it can use Yanukovich’s accession to power in order to strengthen [pro-Russian moods] in Crimea, we warn them: they will not succeed.”
On February 19, 1954 – the “Black Date” as activists call it now – Crimea was given to Ukraine, which at the time was one of the republics of the USSR. The gift from Nikita Khrushchev, then leader of the Soviet Union, was meant to mark the 300-year anniversary of Ukraine’s unification with Russia.
What exactly was behind Khrushchev’s move is for historians to puzzle over. It is believed he announced his decision all of a sudden, during a tea break. “By the way, comrades, there is an opinion to deliver Crimea to Ukraine,” he said. “It is easier that way,” the Communist leader added. No one dared to protest.
“One and a half million Russians… living in Crimea and Sevastopol appealed to Russian authorities to remind them of some clauses of the agreement on friendship, cooperation and partnership that relate to providing protection of rights of Russians living in Ukraine,” stated Sergey Shuvainikov, the chairman of the Congress of Russian communities in Crimea. He underlined that they need legal protection and insist Moscow should look for diplomatic ways of influencing Ukrainian authorities.
According to Novy Region, the Russian consul appeared at the gathering and, for his part, promised that Moscow will pay serious attention to working with compatriots.
The event ended on a positive note with the playing of the Russian anthem.
The Ukrainian Autonomous Republic of Crimea occupies the peninsula of the same name located on the northern coast of the Black Sea. Every summer, its picturesque beaches and mountains attract thousands of holidaymakers seeking sea and sun.
ROAR: “Police for society, not society for police”The Interior Ministry should not reform itself, analysts say, stressing the need for public control over law enforcement agencies. |
20.02.2010, 12:36
32 comments
Timoshenko drops appeal against presidential election resultsUkrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko has withdrawn her appeal against the results of the country's presidential run-off from the country’s Supreme Administrative Court. |
Jsmith: the opening lines of the Soviet anthem go, "Unbreakable bond of freeborn republics / put together by great Russia." Some leading Soviet personalities were indeed not Russian. But the Soviet Union itself was a Russian thing, built as an aggrandizement of Russian chauvinism, not the chauvinism of any other single Soviet "republic" nor of the lot of them together. Of course the Soviet Union oppressed Russians in Russia. The foolishness of the Soviet Union was, that dogma was always and forever much more important than people. But in non-Russian areas like the Baltics, local Baltic people were discriminated against at the hand of Russians and in the service of Soviet dogma even more than Russians themselves were. There are more examples of this than could be fitted into a hundred forum posts.
why do you all keep going back and forth? if you have your opinions then keep it to yourself! if you believe your opinion is correct then it should not matter what others think express your opinions in other ways then arguing, that's what ruined several governments around the world. discussion is valid but listen to what others are saying! do not just assume that what others opinions say is untrue. every statistic you find on the internet is not entirely accurate, so just read a book on the subject! I believe that more people find correct statistics and information while reading an informing book then you would on some random website.












Larisa, if you do a quick survey you will find that there are literally hundreds of articles and forum topics on RT to which I have never contributed a syllable. This article is about the Soviet Union, Crimea, Stalin and the alleged generosity of Soviet territorial manipulations. The Baltics are scarcely off-topic in such a context. My original reference to the Baltics was limited, but then others took up the discussion, sometimes by posting material which I believe does not coincide with facts. I have brought relevant facts to bear on their assertions, and discussions have proceeded from there. Obviously the subject must be of some interest, else people would not participate. I suggest that the interest stems from the fact that Moscow continues to maintain and vigorously promote a position which is historically and factually indefensible. When I bring relevant facts to bear, some readers react in a fairly volatile way. And by the way, the facts that I present, being facts, are not something I dreamed up myself last night. They are commonly available from all relevant reference sources. Many entire nations find Russia’s embrace of certain Soviet-era fictions highly offensive, and this constantly handicaps Russia’s foreign policies and harms its image abroad – perhaps you have noticed. One would think that Russian policymakers would have noticed as well, and initiated changes that would bring genuine advantage to their country. The real question is, why does Russia maintain such positions, not why do I and others refute them.