Russian minister dismisses allegations hijacked ship carried weapons
Published: 08 September, 2009, 15:01
Edited: 09 September, 2009, 03:01
TAGS: Arms, Scandal, Middle East, Politics, North Korea
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has dismissed allegations appearing in the British press, and picked up by some Finnish newspapers, that the vessel Arctic Sea was carrying weapons to Iran.
Newspapers claim the ship, which was missing for nearly a month, was loaded with S-300 anti-aircraft systems while being serviced in Kaliningrad.
From the moment of its disappearance in July, Arctic Sea proved a wonderful target for speculation. Everyone, from the people that were looking for it, to the governments of various countries and the mass media, speculated on what had happened to the ship and what it had been carrying or, more specifically, whether or not it was carrying something illegal.
Some media sources came to the conclusion that the ship could have potentially been carrying Russian missiles to no other country but Iran.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has categorically denied any such allegations of smuggling, and said there was no illegal cargo on board the Arctic Sea. The only cargo the ship was carrying was a large amount of timber.
“The information that there were S-300 missiles aboard the Arctic Sea is absolutely not true. Russia will launch an inspection of that ship as soon as possible, and I assure you we will keep it as transparent as possible so that everyone will be able to see that the rumors are false,” assured journalists the Russian foreign minister at a news conference in Moscow on Tuesday.
Since then, a forensic team from Russia’s Investigative Committee of the General Prosecutor’s Office has carried out a detailed inspection of the Arctic Sea’s cargo bay.
“Arctic Sea is now in open sea. Investigators have inspected its cargo in detail. There’s only timber and sawn wood. Forensic experts found no cargo but the one declared so far,” Vladimir Markin, the committee’s spokesman, told the media.
He added that the team is to go on with its work on board for several days.
Transparency is something that is necessary in the Arctic Sea’s case because it has been one big mystery ever since it left port in Scandinavia and disappeared after a few days.
The mystery of Arctic Sea
The Maltese-flagged vessel with 15 Russian crewmembers on board mysteriously disappeared from radar screens at the end of July, sparking an international search and prompting much speculation.
Later it was discovered that the “Arctic Sea” was seized on July 24 in the Baltic Sea. On August 17 the vessel was found by the Russian navy 300 miles off Cape Verde.
The Russian frigate “Ladny” freed the “Arctic Sea” cargo ship in the Atlantic without firing a shot and arrested eight alleged hijackers from Estonia, Latvia and Russia.
A criminal investigation into the case has been launched. The suspects were officially charged with piracy and kidnapping and the crewmembers returned home.
North Korean and Iranian nuclear programs
At the same time, Moscow has been very clear on its positions concerning North Korean and Iranian nuclear ambitions. Moscow insists that under no circumstances should these two countries be forced into a corner and somehow made to co-operate by force, because that would only worsen the situation and lead to further complications.
Lavrov said that the frame of six-party talks that concern the North Korean nuclear program should continue and a compromising diplomatic solution should be found.
As for Iran, Russia has consistently denied supplying missiles of any kind to the country. Russia continues to maintain that Iran deserves a peaceful nuclear program of its own, and it is not targeted at creating a nuclear weapons, which is why Russia is building the Bushehr nuclear power plant for Iran.
The Russian Foreign Ministry says the talks must continue and Iran’s and North Korea’s nuclear programs need to be more transparent in order for the international community to accept them as they are.
08.09.2009, 13:48
1 comment
ROAR: “Trusting relationship unlikely to solve main problem for Russia-Japan”As the incoming Japanese prime minister is looking for new ways to resolve a territorial dispute with Russia, his son is helping Moscow’s mayor to eliminate traffic jams in the city. |
08.09.2009, 23:19
1 comment
Why are there more foreign military contractors in Pakistan?“It looks like Xe and the CIA are just waiting for the green light to go in. Some of these contractors are in a gray area or military reservists who work for these companies full time,” journalist Wayne Madsen told RT. |
Its clear as it can be that western press never was democratic,free and truthfull...with cpecial attencion on any subject on Russia!Russia can sell anyone (almost) anything with respect on international law-S-300 came under that umbrela.Those kind of weapons never travel on boat for monts!They are usual loaded on planes-with protection wich follow..Russia has also border with Iran...Western press lies start in Usa than Uk-and than spread in rest"democratic"and "free"partner states... Western press is indeed a joke-many of they own people dont pay any attencion to them.RT shall ask for licence-same as Al Jazeera did in Usa-in those states, so their own people can see that is a true free,democratic and honest press look like! Their "inependent and free"fits their states government policy-same one(USA,UK) wich commit genocide(wipe out)on natives from 500 y. ago and stole their land-same one of today wich keep killing of innorcent people in Iraq and Afganistan under folse excuse on war on "terror"-9/11- was inside job...Their press got same "profile" as their states! Nothing new from"free press propaganda west"......
Given that we do now know that the governments of Russia and other countries knew the precise location of the ship "Artic Sea" at all times, it follws that the transfer of any illicit cargo would have certainly been oberved by the military and/or intelligence agencies of several countries. As I understand it, an S-300 system is basically a big truck. Even missile from the S-300 system is pretty big and not easy to hide. If someone in Russia wanted to smuggle something like S-300s to Iran, an overland route (maybe using the Caspian Sea) seems more likely and considerabley less risky for the smugglers. The idea of smuggling S-300s on the "Arctic Sea" seems a bit unlikely. Maybe someone was smuggling something smaller - maybe small arms to some African state... That seems more believeable but without facts, still pure conjecture.












What is wrong if Russia was selling anti-aircraft systems to Iran? I doubt they can be used for offensive purposes.