West inviting civil war in Syria - Lavrov

Published time: July 16, 2012 09:34
Edited time: July 16, 2012 15:34
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov speaks during a press conference in Moscow, July 16, 2012 (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev)

Announcing that it is not taking sides in the Syrian crisis, Russia is calling for an immediate ceasefire in order to let the Annan Plan bring about the necessary conditions for lasting peace.

Dismissing Western criticism of Russia’s adherence to the Annan Plan, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reiterated Moscow’s call for both sides in the 16-month conflict to lay down their arms and enter into peace talks.

"In order to halt the violence, both sides in the conflict must be forced simultaneously to cease hostilities, synchronize withdrawal of heavy weaponry from cities and place all armed people under the UN mission's control," Lavrov told a press conference on Monday.

Russia’s staunch defense of the Annan Plan was given a boost as Kofi Annan, UN-Arab League Special Envoy to Syria, began a two-day visit to the Russian capital. During the talks, Moscow will also be negotiating vigorously for an extension of the UN Supervision Mission in Syria.

Lavrov said Annan’s visit underscores Russia’s dedication to enforcing “the six-point peace plan, which involves a political diplomatic settlement of the Syrian conflict."

Annan will meet with President Putin on Tuesday, the Russian minister added.

Meanwhile, Lavrov did not miss an opportunity to address Russia’s detractors – specifically the United States – which, he said, seeks to “blame” Russia and China for the ongoing hostilities in Syria.

"It is not right to blame the situation [in Syria] on Russia and China, to say nothing about threats like 'they are going to pay for this'," he said.

Earlier this month, Clinton told an international conference: “The only way that will change (Russia and China supporting Syria) is if every nation represented here directly and urgently makes it clear that Russia and China will pay a price.

­Lavrov slammed the remarks as “undiplomatic” and “simply uncivilized.”

The Russian minister then criticized Moscow's western partners for provoking a civil war in the country.

"Some of my Western colleagues even proposed that the resolution [the Western draft resolution that mentions Chapter 7 of the UN Charter] declare an economic, financial and communication blockade against the Syrian government,” the minister said. “In other words, even talks with [the Syrian government] are ruled out.”

"This is a direct invitation to a civil war, not the implementation of the Geneva communique," Lavrov declared.

Stressing that Russia is not supporting the Syrian government in the conflict, Lavrov said Moscow wants all parties to follow the set of internationally-accepted proposals for ending the violence.

"We are not supporting Bashar al-Assad,” he said bluntly. “We are supporting what everybody has agreed upon: Kofi Annan's plan, the Security Council resolution and the Geneva communique, and we fully support these documents."

Lavrov added the caveat that the proposals for bringing about the conditions for peace must not be manipulated by outside parties.

"These documents can only be implemented entirely, and not in individual parts that someone might be favoring," the minister said. "We shall accept any decision by the Syrian people as to who will run Syria, as long as it is a decision made by the Syrian people themselves."

What began in March 2011 as pockets of public protests in Syria has swelled into a violent conflict that is pitting an armed opposition against the government of President Bashar al-Assad, who assumed leadership in 2000.

In keeping with Moscow’s efforts to engage both sides in the conflict, Lavrov met prominent Syrian opposition activist Michael Kilo in Moscow on July 9; the negotiation process continued two days later when Lavrov held talks with Abdel Basset Sayda, the head of the oppositional Syrian National Council (SNC).

Meanwhile, Lavrov downplayed the defection of some Syrian officials and military personnel, saying such incidences would not affect Russia's attitude to the Syrian settlement.

"Such things [as the defection of government supporters to the opposition] happen,” he said. "There is no magic figure when a certain number of defectors would mean a radical change in the situation.

Russia is more concerned about the future of the Syrian people than individual generals diplomats, the minister added.

Lavrov revealed one of the problems hindering the peace process, which involved members of the armed opposition being encouraged "to reject any proposals of ceasefire or truce, to put forward unilateral demands so that the government would disarm unilaterally." 

“The [Syrian government] will not do that, everyone understands that perfectly well," he concluded.

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (53)

socialite (unregistered) 19.08.2012 17:05

TO: I wish the UN would tell Obama to leave. (unregistered) wrote in #14
I wish the U N would tell Obama to leave. (unregistered) wrote in #13
Do you want Russia and China to agree to NATO to bomb Syria to kill more people?

-No. The West doesn't want or need to bomb Syria. All they need is impose sanctions against Assad and isolate him internationally and politely ask him to retire. However, Russia, who has military dealings with Damascus, will never agree on that. 

Why can't the U.S tell rebels or opposition to co-operate to bring about transitional government sharing power with the government until 2014 where elections would held for a fully democratic government which should be properly monitored by the world's community?
-Becau se until then another 10-15,000 of people will die. Also, democratic elections under Assad is a contradiction in terms.

Why is America afraid of democracy?
-Becau se it is not.

Don't you think the natural democratic forces and processes would force Assad out of power because the majority would force him out of power with votes?
-No, dictators are never forced out of power by the "natural democratic forces and processes". Dictators, like Gaddafi or Assad, stick to power like leeches to the bitter end, i.e. until removed by force. Assad's fate will be the same.

Democratic people or forces, Respect International Law! Dictators ignore International Law! Assad is not Isolated, thats exactly why NATO has to resort to illegal, covert war activities on Syria. Speaking of dictators,who elected the oligarchy that rules the United States in secrecy? Do you know who they are? I didn't think so.

0

Undo

Geronimo O.K. 18.08.2012 23:28

Pro democrasy (unregistered) wrote in #3
I'm actually surprised why Syria should be forced negotiate with terrorists. Just finish them off and talk later. Imagine if China armed the Occupy Wall street movement to fight the USA government. Would the US negotiate with the 99% or it will simply kill them?The zionists must stop their double standards. You only have to look at Waco were they ruthlessly gassed hundreds of members of a jewish sect. No mercy for women nor children.

+1

Undo

urhanne (unregistered) 22.07.2012 18:30

Syria is a fake media-war. The west does not want negotiations in fear of Asads domestic support. If you want another regime unable of reasoning and killing its own people in the region to invade and tople I got a suggestion. Many fake "arab" commentators at the moment. Easy to see

+1

Undo

View all comments (53)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us