Lavrov: we will build a new model of cooperation
Published: 27 October, 2009, 14:06
Edited: 28 October, 2009, 15:53
TAGS: Meeting, Asia, Russia, Politics
Issues of strategic partnership between Russia, India and China have been brought up as foreign ministers of the three nations met to discuss the emerging new world order in India’s Bangalore.
Russia, India and China call each other strategic partners – that’s why it didn’t come as a surprise that the range of topics discussed at the ninth meeting of Foreign Ministers of these three countries in India’s Bangalore on Tuesday, was rather wide. Boosting cultural and economic cooperation, overcoming the global financial crisis, climate change, energy security, regional disputes and reforming the United Nations – all were among the issues on the table.
“We’ve come to understand that the current economic crisis is a reflection of the fact that the global architecture constructed after the Second World War no longer corresponds to reality,” said Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov after meeting with his counterparts Yang Jiechi of China and S. M. Krishna of India.
The three nations have agreed to combine efforts to build a more democratic, multi-centered and fair international system, both in the spheres of economy and international security.”
Calls for a new multi-centered global political structure have been voiced by Russian officials before, including President Dmitry Medvedev. On Monday, during the Russian Foreign Minister’s visit to Sri Lanka, one day before the meeting with the ministers of RIC (Russia, India, China) in Bangalore, Sergey Lavrov stressed once again, that the new system can only be built on the principles of international law and the United Nations.
In addition, according to the Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi, Russia, India and China have become strong emerging powers, and he thinks that if these three partners manage to keep up with the times, they may help to build a new world order, reflecting the diversity of cultures and civilizations and providing prosperity and stability.
A communiqué signed at the end of Tuesday’s meeting shows how cooperation between the three states has gone even further. Russia, India and China have started working together in the area of Disaster Mitigation and Relief, with the latest meeting on it held in Samara in Southern Russia in July 2008. A meeting on agricultural cooperation is planned to be held in November/December 2009 (as the territory of Russia and India stretches over 20% of the world’s landmass) in New Delhi, and a Health and Medicine group meeting is scheduled to be held Russia in 2010.
According to the communiqué, Russia, India and China are reiterating the need for reforming the United Nations in order for the organization to be able to react to global challenges more quickly and effectively. All three sides severely condemn terrorism and are calling for strong international cooperation, particularly within the framework of the UN. Energy is also quite an important part of the relations between these three nations, and it’s no wonder why – Russia is a major supplier of oil and gas, while India and China are major energy consumers.
Another issue bringing the three states closer is Afghanistan. The RIC says it is more than interested in eliminating the terrorist threat near its members’ borders, and is discussing ways to help the country recover economically.
Speaking on the plane on the way back from India to Moscow, Sergey Lavrov says: “India, Russia and China can only try to influence the situation in Afghanistan towards its normalization, but our efforts alone would not be enough and I’d like to stress that the RIC was not developed for this purpose. But I can assure you these three countries can and are ready to develop a collective strategy, which includes other major players.”
The Foreign Minister’s statement comes as Russia recently opened an air transit route through its territory for US planes delivering cargo to Afghanistan, something which many saw impossible during the last years of George W. Bush’s presidency.
So, can this be the beginning of a shift in the global political system which still often seems haunted by the ghosts of the Cold War?
“The Bush administration used to have quite a one-sided understanding of collective efforts… Washington used to make the decision on its own, be it in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Middle East or elsewhere, and then proposed everyone else to support it. And Barack Obama has a different philosophy – one of collective actions, which doesn’t include everyone following what Washington says, but on the contrary – points out the need for joint analysis and a collective approach to finding solutions. At the moment the old Bush approach is still coming through on the lower levels of power… but we feel that President Obama has a clear understanding of the need to get other states involved, if they can contribute to finding a strategy. It will take time until the President’s ideas are put into motion,” says the Russian Foreign Minister.
The next meeting of the Foreign Ministers of Russia, India and China is planned to be held in 2010.
Egor Piskunov, RT
27.10.2009, 02:10
10 comments
“Karadzic will be found guilty regardless of the facts”Radovan Karadzic tried to invoke an immunity agreement with Richard Holbrook to prove that the Hague tribunal has always been a political instrument of the US government, says historian and journalist Neboisja Malic. |
27.10.2009, 15:38
ROAR: “Holbrooke should clarify possible deal with Karadzic”Russian analysts believe the international tribunal in The Hague treats Serbians as “most responsible” for war crimes during the Bosnian war in the 1990s. |
"Russia, India and China have agreed to coordinate common efforts to create a multi-polar, more democratic and fair international system, both in the economic sphere and global security," Needless to say, China isn't a democracy nor is it humanistic or even humanitarian. Its export of weapons Sudan's genocidal government decisively highlight the lattermost point and also manifest another truth: wielding power is dangerous, whether the West does it or someone else does it. Just because these powers are not the west doesn't mean it is entirely implausible they could act in an equivalent manner. In the sense of humanitarian fallout, the USSR did many times. Nevertheless, I hold hope that this coalition of cooler minds will be a positive influence on the world. The balance of power inherent in a multipolar system perhaps mitigates the excesses of each pole involved. I agree with new model in the sense that Russia, like the US, has a lot of work to do if it to avoid becoming a has-been in the face of these new titans, and we have more than enough honorable work to do of lifting up our own people. But no one is perfect, and some people need help more than others. Albeit Russia has a per capita GDP of 11k, and the US, while not as poor at the moment, has a lot of huge sustainability problems on its plate .
Russia has a declining population and a severe population drug and alcohol problem , deep poverty and many other hurdles to overcome. There is no magic Asian alliance that is going to cure all. Russia, like many other countries, needs to get a handle on the situation on the home front before they get too carried away about treaties and alliances. They should look to twenty years in the future when China nhas to expand their population into Siberia. How can a small population like Russia currently has contron the territorial integrity of such huge territory? Russia first needs to get the population decline turned around.
First truth is realised personally. Thus truth is realised by a Nation. True International relations may be be realised consequentialy.