NATO's rhetoric on Libya ‘most cynical propaganda’ – Rogozin
Published: 30 August, 2011, 16:02
Locals inspect the damaged outside a bombed house in the Libyan coatal town of Zliten, 150 kilometres (95 miles) east of Tripoli, that a government official said was destroyed in a NATO attack in which a mother and two children were killed early on August 4, 2011 (AFP Photo / Imed Lamloum)
TAGS: Conflict, Military, NATO, Africa, Politics
The criticism of NATO voiced at an international conference in the Czech Republic is a sign of the growing discontent with the Alliance's policy both in Europe and in the US, stated Russia's NATO Ambassador Dmitry Rogozin.
“I think the ‘Prague wave’, which has reached us, I mean the wave of stinging commentaries regarding NATO, indicates that the Alliance is running a serious risk of undermining its unshakeable reputation as an honest broker in matters of war and peace,” Rogozin told Interfax on Tuesday.
His comments came at the end of a conference titled “Central Europe, EU and New Russia,” a forum organized by the independent Czech think-tank Fontes Rerom and the European movement, an international association aimed at promoting civil society. It was attended by representatives of ten European countries and the US. The Russian delegation was led by the lower house vice-chairman Aleksandr Babakov.
Rogozin said that during the conference many Europeans spoke of NATO as a “police” or even a “criminal” organization. The Russian politician noted that the current mood has been gaining ground since the start of the military operation in Libya.
“Western intellectuals are strongly disappointed with the Alliance’s actions in Libya, as well as the policies of some specific member states,” Rogozin stated, adding that the rhetoric of some NATO representatives concerning Libya is “absolutely outrageous, going beyond the most cynical propaganda.”
Their commentaries suggest that “dozens of thousands of bombs dropped on Libya hit the targets so accurately and gracefully that not a single hair stirred on the heads of ordinary Libyan citizens as the bombs flew over them,” Rogozin said.
The Russian ambassador to NATO believes that saying such things inevitably draws criticism in the West even from politicians who have been traditionally loyal to NATO.
30.08.2011, 15:14
1 comment
Kyrgyz President warns against return to presidential republicWhile celebrating the 20th anniversary of Kyrgyzstan’s independence, President Roza Otunbayeva said that any return to a presidential form of government could cause "constitutional disorder" and this mistake must not be repeated. |
Limit on party presence in Duma ‘undemocratic’A top Russian state official has criticized a proposal to bring in a law limiting the number of seats held by any single party in the 450-seat Lower House to 226. |
I waited hopefully for the Russian or Chinese calling of the Security Council or some official complaint against the Nato's abuse of the resolution on which Russia abstained.
I waited and waited and waited............
I have the utmost respect for Mr Putin but in this I and many others around the world feel just one massive let down.
The people of Libya were undergoing a barbaric and illegal bombing campaign.
They were being murdered as just another discounted bit of NATO 'collatoral' damage.
And NO ONE, not one nation stood before the UN and world's media and publicly denounced it.
Not one.
Obscene!
Where was Russia?
@Roger Coze.. mate what are you really. "Russia to join NATO brothers" you must be out of your mind. Russia does not need NATO. NATO needs Russia.
But who would want to join this barbaric NATO only idiots who are power hungry. The West is full of hypocrisy and lies, day in day out a new lie comes out. Libyan citizens had a normal life 6 months ago and NATO destroyed it, by bombing everything in there path to kill Gaddafi and they have failed and left the Libyan people with nothing.. no water..etc






@ Dex I completly agree that NATO needs Russia more than Russia needs NATO, but that does not mean that Russia would not benefit from joining. Turning what is basically seen now as an enemy into a friend. Also of course NATO brothers, Russia is European and has European brothers. Look at Tsar Nicholas the second he married a women from Hesse. Denmark helped Russia in the time when Russia was just being created. As for power hungry, I do not think any capitalist country can avoid a hunger for power. Also a normal life under dictatorship is no normal life for me. The hardships that the Libyans are facing may pay off in the end if they are determined and ready to start a new chapter for Libya.