VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   US to lose its base in Kyrgyzstan  
MORE ON THE STORY
Russian soldiers on military base in Kyrgyzstan 15.02.2011, 18:05

Russia negotiates terms for military base in Kyrgyzstan

The annual rent for a unified Russian military base may exceed $4.5 million, according to Kyrgyz Defense Minister Abibilla Kudayberdiev.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, left, and Kyrgyzstan's President Roza Otunbayeva seen at a news conference in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 03.12.2010, 11:52 1 comment

US to keep Kyrgyz air base until Afghanistan pullout – Clinton

Washington will not consider shutting down its Manas airbase in Kyrgyzstan until troops are pulled out of Afghanistan in 2014, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said.

04.11.2010, 23:46 3 comments

US awards a $300 million fuel contract to a secretive company

The Pentagon has awarded a fuel contract worth over $300 million to supply its Manas air base in Kyrgyzstan to a corporation that is currently under investigation by the US Congress.

09.08.2010, 18:00 11 comments

US taxpayers to learn three new letters

Does president Obama want a second military base in Kyrgyzstan? US plans to create a second military base in the country were made public on August 7 in a story by one of the top US newspapers.

Manas military airbase, photo by Maj. Damien Pickart 20.04.2009, 15:59

Manas airport to be purely civilian after US pullout

Once the US Central Asian airbase in Manas is closed down, the Kyrgyzstan airport will not be used for military purposes.

AFP Photo/Getty Images 06.03.2009, 12:56

Kyrgyz parliament ends Manas agreements

Kyrgyzstan’s parliament has voted to rescind the agreements with 11 countries that allowed them to place military contingents at Manas airbase.

AFP Photo / Vyacheslav Oseledko 19.02.2009, 14:19

Closure of Kyrgyz base a blow to US war in Afghanistan

The parliament in Kyrgyzstan has voted for the closure of the US air base at Manas.

US to lose its base in Kyrgyzstan

Published: 12 August, 2011, 19:31

Manas military air base (RIA Novosti / Vladimir Voronin)

Manas military air base (RIA Novosti / Vladimir Voronin)

TAGS: Military, NATO, Politics, Central Asia, Afghanistan, USA


Kyrgyzstan is not going to prolong its agreement with Washington, which entitles the US to use Manas Transit Center to supply its forces in Afghanistan, after it expires in 2014, the republic's Prime Minister Almazbek Atambayev has said.

“…In full compliance with our commitments, we will inform the American side on the termination of the contract six months prior to its expiry,” the Central Asian state's premier said in an interview with Rosbalt agency. Kyrgyzstan plans to turn the Center, formerly known as Manas Air Base, into a civil transportation hub. Both Russian and Western investors would be welcome to participate in the creation of the facility, Atambayev added.

The military installation has been used as a key transit center for US and allied troops deployed to Afghanistan since the beginning of the Afghan War in 2001.

However, in 2009 the Manas military base was transformed into a transit hub used for the delivery of non-military cargo for the international coalition operating out of the Islamic republic. That followed a string of conflicts over the sum of rent and other incidents involving the base’s personnel, after which Kyrgyzstan denounced an agreement on maintaining a military air base on their territory. A significant rent increase and US investments into several Kyrgyz projects helped the sides to iron out their differences and ultimately reach a compromise.

After the 2010 ouster of former President Kurmanbek Bakiev following bloody anti-government protests, the new government was to make a decision on the fate of the base near the Kyrgyz capital.

Prime Minister Atambayev noted the former leadership's “preconceived attitude to undertaken commitments” has spoiled Kyrgyzstan’s image abroad. In order to improve it, the republic has no choice but to fulfill previously reached agreements, he said.

Back in December 2010, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that Washington would not consider shutting down its Manas transit center until troops were pulled out of Afghanistan in 2014.

“And then we will look to see if there is any continuing mission that would be of benefit to Kyrgyzstan that would be continued there,” she said while speaking to Kyrgyz students and civil society representatives in a televised interview during her trip to the Central Asian state. Later, while talking to the military personnel in Manas, she noted “You are not going to be here indefinitely”.

Apparently, Kyrgyzstan no longer finds it beneficial to host the so-called transit center. The US was already resolved to the fact that they’d have to leave the crucial hub in Central Asia sooner or later, though probably not this soon.

On June 23, a new ramp was opened at Manas International Airport. It was constructed under an agreement between Washington and Bishkek.

“The ramp we are opening today is a thirty million dollar improvement to the airport’s infrastructure. Not only will it further our ability to support the mission in Afghanistan, but it will serve as a lasting benefit to Kyrgyzstan and its economy,” said American Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan Pamela L. Spratlen while speaking at the opening ceremony, as quoted by the embassy's official website. In addition, she said, the US would contribute $30 million for a new Kyrgyz Republic air traffic control system. With all of this happening at a time when the US economy is in deep trouble over its own internal debt crisis, one has to wonder if it is simply the United States’ boundless generosity which is at play.

When the republic's parliament voted to terminate their lease to the US for the air base in 2009, the then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that the US was looking for alternative locations.

“I would say that Manas is important, but not irreplaceable. We are looking at alternatives. We have not foreclosed on the possibility that Manas would remain open. We're looking at whether, given the importance that Manas plays and the likely growing importance of Manas, whether there is something we ought to do differently in terms of compensation,” he said, speaking at the Pentagon, as cited by the US Department of Defense website. He added that the US was not prepared to stay at the Kyrgyz base “at any price”, but added that “clearly Manas is important to us”.

+10 (12 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
The opposition says the government "ignores Georgian" 12.08.2011, 19:20 5 comments

Georgia switches to English

An opposition party in Tbilisi claims the authorities want to make English the dominant language in Georgia.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad interviewed by RT 14.08.2011, 14:53 6 comments

Nuclear weapons are the weapons of the previous century - Ahmadinejad to RT

Full transcript of the interview with Iranian President aired LIVE on RT from Tehran on August 13.

Arab world protests Libyan conflict
AgreeToDisagree August 22, 2011, 01:27
0

Not a bad thing. How about letting go of 1000 other bases worldwide and holding a monthly LOTTERY where the same funds are GIVEN to one of the poor or homeless? Thats 1000 Americans per month and 12,000 Americans in 1 year that will be given a lifetime of funds, can be bailed out of homelessness/receivership, can have their debts paid off. Fully paid security for 1000 Americans a month instead of a temporary base that does not belong to the US and has to be maintained to no real purpose. Homes not Harm.

Maxwell August 18, 2011, 05:32
0

I think the world could benefit more, if the USA and Russia left military bases on foreign soil but returned to share, learn and enjoy the people of those same foreign countries. Just a thought!

Roger Coze August 17, 2011, 06:23
0

@ Bogdanov not at all I do not "give my blessing to those who kill not-their-kind". I also have no dreams of what you call "purifications". However those who strap bombs to their children and treat their women like dirt, then the actions that the west have taken are expected. Also maybe Muslims would not be as discriminated against if they did not go where they are not wanted. The hatred for Islam is totally to blame on Islam. The west intervened in Korea ,as you said, and look at the south. a democratic strong nation with a mighty economy. As for who divides oppressed and oppressors that is our own choice ,but the leaders choices are the most important and I tend to agree with the leaders of  the west on who is the enemy. (not all the time, but most)