Those guards are like saying, "I better watch my six o'clock wuth these guys around". 

@ Llirik, who wear no Brequet
Ban� �..ban….ban…my dear Big Brother..you yet again are imploring to the STATE’s authority, eventhough you presumably think that right to promote homosexual life style (as it would happen in the pride parades) stems from naturally born (given by God) right to choose between different kind of sexual activity. If look for theories of human rights origin  you will inevitably come across  remarkable notion of a human right  given by God with the birth of each human being. . In case anyone still believes in their God given right to bleach himself down there, there is no law preventing anyone from doing it, its ultimately up to him. But, please keep your “bedtime” stories and parades to yourself whatever they are.  Law is often defined by cultural and ethical norms of a given society. It can be forced upon as taken from the absolutely foreign and alien culture for the simple reason that it will not survive- it will be amended sooner or later. Russian mentality has been hugely shaped up by Orthodox faith. It’s not news. Russian state was born exactly when Russians were christmated into Orthodoxy. Even being a Russian atheist or a seldom church goer will never lead you to stripping you off of that morality concepts which are in your DNA.  In America there has been always a lot of confusion and misunderstanding of how to deal with majority rights versus minority rights in order to avoid tyranny and please each group. Adoption gay marriages law shows the worst handling of that concept ever. And what some Western people are failing empirically to observe is that when citizens are gradually start losing their moral backbone the state oppression alleviates threefold. Deal with it now..

Clair (unregistered) wrote in #9
Good day for Russia....
Then ban cheating and ban divorce between straight couples. Ban SEPARATION of any straight couple, because surely that is not supportive of the family unit or societal cohesion, surely that form of non-loving *may* be based on a Biblical sin or conflict indicative of or based on a Biblical sin. For instance, separations between couples may happen because one person cheats (adultery), or is jealous of another (envy), or simply loses their affections (counter to 1 Cor. 13 and the precept to "love one's neighbor as yourself" - meaning you cannot stop loving anyone, including especially your significant other at any stage of a relationship, and then cannot separate from them if there is no wrong done to you or vices exhibited within the person). The first two themselves, adultery and envy, are other grave sins (at least in Catholicism), to go along with fornication and sexual gratification of ANY sort. 

Also, what you WANT may be distinctly different from what the Bible PREACHES, or what reason dictates as analogously bannable situations and populations if the same principles for which this group is banned are extrapolated to all walks of life, thereby demolishing your claim that governments, in your opinion, should not dictate every sexual action and idiosyncrasy. It isn't about anyone's guilty conscience - it is a question of conscience and moral authority/culpabilit y in general.