The Law should be made but Russia must meet in middle. The video was Blashemy because they song video was made by Lesbians that were actors and not Lesbian. and that should not be allowed as if there was a video with someone trying to be a religion and they are not that, its ok, but to put on video. the Law should say if there is a video it should not be actors but the truth... if the video was made with 2 real Lesbians , then it would not be a problem cause it was true, but there was actors

one or the other (unregistered) #19 Do you think incest should be legal?  *No, it causes genetic issues in later generations.

18 year old and a 15 year old? *Depends on  the culture. I personally think children should be allowed to be children until they are 18.

12 year old and a 30 year old?  *No. 12 is not mature enough to make decisions.

man and a monkey?  *No.  Monkeys can't give consent. This would be animal abuse. Evangelicals have problems understanding this for some reason??

2 men and a 1 women?  Free to do what they want.

3 men able to get married?  No, only two, just like everyone else.

your justification for your interpretation?  *Allowing two committed people to marry delivers equality and is good for a stable families, extended families and society. *Polygam y has been proven to be bad for societies, old wealthier men pushing young men out of the community to get rid of competition. Women tend to become property and young girls abused.  This has been observed in Mormon communities.
is there anything that you would be opposed to even if the parties involved consented? *Probably, but specifics are needed.  Usually based on if it puts a cost on society. 

Surely by your understanding you cannot oppose any of these as that would be a result of your indoctrination, forcing your views on consenting adults? 

* This is an opinion phrased as a question. You assume my answers before I answered them; very disingenuous.

people were getting married and having children at 10.  *It wasn't that long ago that our life span was around 30, what is your point?

do n't use the word absurd for the examples. * I have answered your questions even though they are common evangelical misconceptions and you will probably ignore their conclusions.

 its nothing to do with religion, tho
everybody believes in something, an athiesm is a belief, since they have not died yet they are talking about something they cannot know as a fact. so it is a belief.  *This is a evangelical misconc eption. Atheist don't claim to know, they claim there is or isn't evidence to support something.  No one can know there isn't a god, it's untestable, therefore unknowable. But then the same thing goes for leprechauns.

Just because you can't prove something, doesn't automatically mean you've disproved it.  *You are correct, what is your point?  If we used that philosophy without using evidence to filter nonsense, the things that you couldn't prove is only limited by imagination.  I have a box the dimensions are unknown, prove to me what's not in it.   *Your entire argument is religious, this type of argument is transparent.  If you admit it's religious, you lose the argument.  If you lose the argument, it causes contradiction in your superstitious beliefs. Your beliefs can't be wrong, remember? "see step one"