VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   Martyrdom for Muammar Gaddafi?  
MORE ON THE STORY
PHOTO: An image captured off a cellular phone camera shows the arrest of Libya's strongman Muammar Gaddafi in Sirte on October 20, 2011 (AFP Photo / Philippe Desmazes)VIDEO: Amateur video purportedly showing dead Gaddafi 20.10.2011, 15:22 87 comments

Gaddafi killed fleeing his stronghold (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

Libyan Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril has confirmed that Colonel Gaddafi has been killed. The fugitive leader died of wounds sustained in his capture near Sirte.

Libyan conflict
Libya, Tripoli : Saif al-Islam Kadhafi, son of Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi, appears in front of supporters and journalists at his father's residential complex in the Libyan capital Tripoli in the early hours of August 23, 2011. (AFP Photo / Imed Lamloum) 20.10.2011, 21:05 11 comments

Gaddafi’s most wanted son killed or captured?

Al Arabiya TV has reported that Colonel Gaddafi's son, Saif al-Islam, has been killed on the same day as his father. In the meantime, a Libyan minister says Gaddafi’s heir apparent is wounded and in hospital.

A Libyan man shouts slogans as he waves the flag of the Libyan revolution (AFP Photo / Saeed Khan) 08.06.2011, 15:45 6 comments

Russia holding the middle ground in Libya

With civil war raging between the rebels and forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, and NATO operations looking increasingly ineffectual, Russia finds itself in a unique position for getting the warring sides to the negotiating table.

Martyrdom for Muammar Gaddafi?

Published: 21 October, 2011, 16:24

Muammar Gaddafi (AFP Photo)

Muammar Gaddafi (AFP Photo)

TAGS: Conflict, Military, Russia, Politics, Chavez, Human rights, USA, Robert Bridge, Libya, Gaddafi


Russia’s Human Rights Commissioner has said that the killing of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi could have the effect of turning him into a national martyr.

Human Rights Commissioner Vladimir Lukin expressed regret over the killing of Muammar Gaddafi, while acknowledging the Libyan strongman was responsible for many crimes.

"Murder is a horrible and despicable thing, and people who effectively watched Gaddafi's murder live on television may have had precisely these feelings,” Lukin told Interfax on Friday. “Although Gaddafi himself is responsible for so much bloodshed."


The commissioner said Gaddafi chose the painful path of civil war when anti-government forces demanded he step down.

"A civil war is the cruelest; it does not take into account any laws of an international war,” Lukin noted. “And here one cannot fail to note that Gaddafi himself embarked on the path of the civil war. Initially he was offered the chance to go, but he chose this path – the path of a civil war."

Gaddafi’s failings as a leader and individual notwithstanding, Lukin expressed regret that the deposed Libyan strongman will not have an opportunity to be judged before an international court of law.

"But still it would have been good if he had been captured and tried by an international court,” the Russian official said. “And now he has been brutally killed, and often over time such things give rise to a legend, which can create the halo of a martyr instead of an insane dictator."

Already, international human rights groups are demanding an investigation into Gaddafi’s murder.

UK-based human rights group Amnesty International called for "a full, independent and impartial inquiry" into the circumstances of Gaddafi's killing.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who was a friend of the colonel, called the circumstances of his death disgraceful.

"They murdered him," Chavez told reporters.

Before Gaddafi’s death was officially confirmed, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said that “Gaddafi’s fate should be decided by the people of Libya.”

Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who seized power in a bloodless military coup on September 1, 1969, died following a fierce gun battle with anti-government forces of the so-called National Liberation Army in the Libyan town of Sirte, where Gaddafi was born in 1942.

Gaddafi’s 42-year rule prior to the uprising made him the longest-ruling Arab leader.

The exact circumstances of his death, which some analysts say appears to be the cold-blooded murder of a prisoner of war, will now be the focus of an international investigation.

Robert Bridge, RT

+11 (11 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
St. Petersburg, Russia: Heads of Eurasian Economic Community member states at a joint press conference on October 19, 2011. (RIA Novosti / Aleksey Nikolsky) 21.10.2011, 15:17 13 comments

The EU is dead: Long live the new EU

The creation of the Eurasian Union (EU-2) as recently mooted by Vladimir Putin could become an integral idea for Russia and allied nations of Eurasia. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin says the concept might become reality as early as 2016.

Dmitry Rogozin (RIA Novosti / Kirill Kallinikov) 21.10.2011, 16:50 35 comments

Gaddafi death: Envoy slams 'sadistic' triumphalism

Russia’s NATO envoy has written in his microblog that the Western elation over the death of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi could have sadistic grounds.

Libyan conflict
Matt Cusumano November 08, 2011, 02:42
+1

I totally disagree with the statement "He embarked on the path of civil war", and "He was given a chance to go". 
This is totally false.
Gadaffi did not choose the path of civil war.  He repeated requested a "cease fire" and and international fact finding mission to determine the facts, to address whatever grievances were being bandied about.  The international community, and the NTC refused to negotiate and insisted on violence.
Gadaffi made several offers towards a "peaceful transition of power", which was immediately rebuffed.  It's amazing how quickly this is all forgotten.
It's totally unreasonable to expect a sovereign government to immediately surrender to their enemies, simply because their enemies asked the to do it, without any discussion, and for the leaders, symbolic, and otherwise to immediately subject themselves to arrest by their enemies, simply because their enemies asked them to do it.  The people supported Gadaffi in Tripoli, and they wouldn't has wanted Gadaffi to simply hand the capitol over to a mix group of armed insurgents.
This situation in Libya was a foreign sponsored insurrection that did not have widespread popular support.
The media worked hard to disguise the true nature of situation on the ground.
Now the Libyan people are living under a totally undemocratic system.  In the Gadaffi era, the people had democratic institutions by which the people governed themselves through their Basic Councils.  These have all been banned under the NTC, which rules by fiat only.

dd October 24, 2011, 18:11
+1

Tim, You should look up the living standards under Ghaddafi rule and compare it with any other African country, even with yours. Besides of that, why do you praise your president, assuming you are US or British citizen? Your leaders are killing and brutalizing people all over the world, for over 50 years now. Or did you assume that killing people is legal when it is done by US or Nato bombs? You guys are so brainwashed that you can't see reality anymore. I feel pity for you.

Tim (unregistered) October 24, 2011, 00:53
-1

"Martyrdom for Muammar Gaddafi?" Yeah, I very much doubt he'll be getting much sympathy from the people he brutalized for 42 years. You people praising him are disgusting sycophants who insult the people of Libya who had to live under this animal.