Breaking news

Strong indications that beheaded soldier is a terrorist incident – Cameron

‘NATO's post-2014 Afghan mission needs UN approval’ - Moscow

Published time: October 17, 2012 12:45
Edited time: October 17, 2012 16:55
A US Army soldier attached to 2nd platoon, C troop, 1st Squadron (Airborne), 91st U.S Cavalry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team operating under the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) looks through his rifle during a patrol near Baraki Barak base in Logar Province, Afghanistan on October 10, 2012. (AFP Photo/Munir uz Zaman)

The western military bloc’s continued presence in Afghanistan beyond its pullout date must get authorization by the UN Security Council, said Russia's NATO ambassador.

"The absence of a UN mandate may weaken regional stability and provoke neighboring countries,” Nikolay Korchunov told reporters on Wednesday. “Questions inevitably arise about the outward implications of such a [military] presence."

A UN mandate for NATO’s extended presence in the Central Asian country would “lay the groundwork for cooperation between NATO and other states, including Russia," the diplomat noted.

Korchunov mentioned NATO’s use of an air corridor across Russia to the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan as an example of successful bilateral cooperation.

Last week, NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen announced the Western military bloc’s intention of remaining in Afghanistan for a “non-combat” mission.

“When we end our current combat operation by the end of 2014, we will have a very strong Afghan security force to take full responsibility for the security all over Afghanistan,” Rasmussen told NATO defense ministers in Brussels. “I feel confident that the Afghan security forces will be able to take such full responsibility.”

There will be 352,000 Afghan security forces and they will be very capable, the NATO chief added.

Rasmussen also vowed that a recent spike in “insider attacks” – which involves NATO-trained Afghan troops turning their weapons on ISAF forces – would not derail the planned mission.

"We have taken a number of measures to prevent such attacks,” he said. “We have strengthened vetting and recruitment procedures; we have strengthened counter-intelligence measures; we will continue to take new steps if necessary because these insider attacks threaten to undermine trust and confidence between foreign troops and Afghan security forces.”

Daily cooperation between foreign troops and Afghan forces is based on trust and confidence, he stressed.

In light of such threats to the post-2014 mission, Russia’s NATO ambassador stressed that it is important that the post-2014 mission avoid “fragmentation of international efforts.” In this connection, “a UN mandate for such plans is taking on additional significance."

NATO is also considering the legal groundwork for the future training mission in Afghanistan, Korchunov believes.

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (4)

Big-one5 (unregistered) 18.10.2012 04:02

NATO will not withdraw until the last "LITHIUM" is un earthed. The Afghan government will have to deal with U.S for the extraction and sale of such metals as is Obama policy that the car battery industry be totally dominated by U.S.  No U.N mandate needed. They didn't needed such mandate to invade Iraq. Good luck at Russia with the U.N ( U.S ,U.N) mandates. Special forces voiced this long ago. They even voiced about Bin Laden. But they get quiet by a subsidized press.

0

Undo

Jack (unregistered) 17.10.2012 20:12

IMO they should have been out of there years ago....but - this is a bilateral issue between the Afghan government and NATO. If Afghanistand and NATO come to an agreement then it's their business not the UN's.

0

Undo

Kihnu (unregistered) 17.10.2012 14:55

Miscow, please come back to reality.

The US-NATO Axis needs no approval from the UN, or anyone else, to continue their occupation of Afghanistan.

This Axis only finds UN useful when they need a thin veneer of deceit to legitimatize their attack on a victim nation.

0

Undo

View all comments (4)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us