Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Moscow gives Syria last chance for reforms

Published time: November 23, 2011 11:54
Edited time: November 23, 2011 15:54
Bashar al-Assad (AFP Photo / Ho-Sana)

The latest UN General Assembly resolution on Syria is a clear signal to President Bashar Assad to curb violence and launch reforms, the head of Russia’s Upper House Committee for International Affairs says.

­“Russia abstained on the latest resolution. It is an explicit message to the Syrian president: reforms, end of violence, free elections,” Mikhail Margelov stressed. “This is what the Syrian leader should do immediately, today, although he should have done it yesterday, even the day before yesterday.”

“Our veto on the Security Council resolution was the last tool allowing President Bashar Assad to save the status quo on the international arena,” the senator added. “With that veto, we have exhausted all possible means.”

The Russian senator stressed that Moscow is against other countries interfering in Syria’s domestic affairs: it is convinced that “the Syrian people are able to settle their problems peacefully, through a political dialogue.”

At the same time, Margelov noted that Moscow “is closely following developments there and is analyzing the positions of all political forces”. 

“Given the grave situation in Syria, calls of some opposition members not to hold any talks with the government are irresponsible,” Margelov concluded. “The political crisis cannot be resolved if the sides refuse to listen to each other.” 

On Tuesday, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution condemning human rights abuses by the Syrian regime, including the killing, arbitrary imprisonment and torture of civilians. The document received 122 votes in favor, 13 against, and 41 abstentions. The non-binding resolution calls on Syria to withdraw government tanks from the streets, release political prisoners, stop attacks on civilians and allow observers into the country.

It comes just weeks after China and Russia vetoed a similar motion in the UN Security Council, which would have been a binding measure.

Commenting on Moscow’s stance, Russia’s deputy envoy to the UN, Sergey Karev said that “a human rights issue should in no circumstances be used as a pretext for interfering in a country’s internal affairs”

“We believe that it is the state that should take responsibility for the protection and promotion of human rights,” Karev noted, “while the international community should provide technical help in the field.”

Comments (12)

Wet 28.11.2011 17:40

Awesome!   Looks like the US is going to get a new base in Syria.  Adios Russians!

0

Undo

Nicolaus 27.11.2011 05:50

The Syrian government, at least officially, acknowledges the need for reform. The President seems to have said that much several times to Western newspapers.

O ne gathers that the legal and Constitutional reforms have been proposed - but the Syrian opposition, according to the Russian government do not want to talk to their government and prefer a regime change - and through NATO intervention!

If they represent the majority of the Syrian people one may go along with their demand, but few can believe that the hundred of thousands of demonstrators in the cities of Syria, according to Lebanese papers, validate such a claim. If the demonstration was ten or twenty, as we see in the opposition demonstrators on Facebook, it is possible to claim that they are paid to march for the regime. It is not. It cannot be described as less genuine than any demonstration one sees even here in New Jersey. 

This makes the situation very difficult to resolve, and one is not surprised that the Arab Kings and Sheiks are sponsoring the revolt, although only one faction, the Islamists (The National Council), based in France, while distancing the secularist two, based in Syria.

And is it not a fortuitous moment for the some to bring down a regime that gave the US and Western countries so much headache in the past fifty years? And how wonderful for them is it to replace it with even an Islamist tyrannical regime, who are ready, to deal with Hizbullah (due to their Shia' sect) and maintain the same friendly relations they demonstrated towards Israel when they participated three months ago in the major Israeli Conference in Paris.

    

0

Undo

Sasa (unregistered) 24.11.2011 16:03

I see that some are surprised by this action of Russia. I am not. The regime will change and the Russia needs approval of the new regime(oposition). Its to be in future in Syria or not to be there. And Russia needs Syria because it has there military base(the only in mediterranean sea) and wants to keep it.
Thats all , no poetry just cold hard facts.

+10

Undo

View all comments (12)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us