Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Russian withdrawal from historic missile treaty ‘cannot be excluded’

Published time: February 09, 2012 12:59
Edited time: February 09, 2012 17:04
Dmitry Medvedev (R) and Barack Obama prior to signing the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) in Prague on April 8, 2010 (AFP Photo / Joe Klamar)

Without the resolution of specific issues with the United States, Moscow says it could withdraw from the New START Treaty.

­Calling the termination of the ballistic missile reduction treaty “undesirable” and not “on the agenda,” one Russian weapons expert nevertheless says the possibility is real.

"Naturally, it would be very undesirable that circumstances would force us to take this step, but it cannot be excluded,” Mikhail Ulyanov, director of the Security and Disarmament Department at the Foreign Ministry, told a news conference on Thursday. “I will add though that the issue is not on the agenda presently.”

President Dmitry Medvedev has stated in the past that if the balance between strategic offensive weapons and missile defense systems is destroyed, then Russia would be forced to walk away from New START.

The preamble to the New START clearly states that both sides recognize “the existence of the interrelationship between strategic offensive arms and strategic defensive arms… and that current strategic defensive arms do not undermine the viability and effectiveness of the strategic offensive arms of the Parties.”

Presently, Russia and the United States are at loggerheads over US plans to build a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, which Moscow says will disrupt the strategic balance, thus effectively destroying the relevance of New START.

Policymakers in both countries have always presumed that any imbalance between strategic offensive and defensive weapons is “fraught with destructive consequences for international security and strategic stability,” Ulyanov said. 

Ulyanov reminded that the interrelationship between strategic offensive weapons and missile defense systems was codified in 1972 at the initiative of the United States when the anti-ballistic missile treaty was drawn up and signed.  

Presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama signed the ballistic missile reduction treaty on April 8, 2010 in Prague.

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (9)

peter (unregistered) 18.02.2012 10:46

Now that president Obama has lost interest in Russia,as his 90% concentration is on new competitor and upcoming super power,China and Asia Pacific,I doube the threat will be taken seriously,the day for Russia is long over!

+3

Undo

nobliss 17.02.2012 15:40

As I have made clear in my articles, one way Kremlin leaders likely hope to sidestep appearing responsible for launching a nuclear war is by provoking the West into throwing the first major punches of world war three. This is why NATO has been lured into the Balkans and why supposedly "former" Russian puppet states like North Korea and Iraq have been gradually pushing toward the brink of renewed conflicts with the West. As I have been emphasizing in my global war articles, either prior to or as part of drawing the West into major conflicts at these flashpoints, Moscow is planning to stage a right-wing coup, possibly involving Vladimir Zhirinovsky's bogus rise to power. Since such a coup will be attributed to the failure of Western-style reform in Russia (possibly on top of Western military action against Russian allies-of-old like the Serbs?), the subsequent world war will be blamed on the West's failure to support Russia, the general shortcomings of Western democracy and Western imperiali st military aggression. All in all, by staging a right-wing coup in Russia and drawing the West into major conflicts with historical Russian allies like the Serbs, North Korea and Iraq, an ideal scenario is created in which Moscow can unleash a global nuclear war and have it appear to be the West's own fault. As a key part of the above strategy to reverse the blame for the coming war on to the West, Kremlin military planners are likely hoping to provoke Israel into launching the first nuclear blow of world war three. As explained toward the end of my articles "A Global War?" and "Global War Alert", with the U.S. and NATO forces tied-up in conflicts on the Korean Peninsula and in the Balkans, the way will be opened for Russia's "Last Dash to the South" (the title of Vladimir Zhirinovsky's supposed autobiography) and an Arab onslaught against Israel since the Western powers will be unable to defend the Middle East and protect Israel like occurred during the Arab surprise attack on the Jewish state in 1973. Thus, Israel will be forced to resort to its "Samson Option" of nuclear retaliation again st the Arabs and Russia in the face of being overrun. (Notably , a chemical and/or biological missile attack against Israel by Saddam Hussein, backed by a new Russian dictator like Vladimir Zhirinov sky, may even be sufficient to elicit an Israel nuclear strike against Russia.)

0

Undo

bert 10.02.2012 15:36

CSTO, NATO, India nor China are each other enemies. All know that very well.

Where is the threat coming from then? From the things happening within Northern Africa and the Middle East.

Concern ing Iran I would not be so sure about their intentions if I was Russia. Makarov has undoubtly his thinkings about that. So does Putin.

+1

Undo

View all comments (9)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us