Moscow, Beijing reconnect as reset with US fizzles

Published time: January 09, 2013 11:52
Edited time: January 09, 2013 15:52
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (L) shakes hands with China's Premier Wen Jiabao (AFP Photo/Takuro Yabe)

Russia and China, which share many of the same international concerns, are looking to fortify their strategic partnership.

­At a time when the neighboring countries are beginning to feel the heat of the US military, it seems only natural that Moscow and Beijing are beginning to plant the seeds of a long-term strategic relationship.

Xi Jinping, the secretary-general of the Chinese Communist Party, underlined his country’s commitment to a Russian partnership when he noted that he and President Vladimir Putin "came to the unanimous conclusion” that a “comprehensive strategic partnership” between Moscow and Beijing remains the “top priority of their foreign policy."

The comments were made on Tuesday during a visit to Beijing by Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolay Patrushev, who is participating in the eighth round of Russian-Chinese consultations on strategic security.

Xi Jingping, 59, who was sworn as the highest-ranking Communist official in November, echoed the sentiments of the Russian president, who noted at his recent Q&A session with international media that Russo-Chinese relations “have become one of the most important factors in the (realm of) international affairs."

Given the geopolitical realities of the region, it should come as no surprise that Moscow and Beijing are looking to forge a strategic partnership.  

Whereas China, traditionally an isolationist country that shuns bilateral alliances, rarely reveals its political hand, Russia made a leap of faith when it attempted to forge a so-called reset in relations with Washington. Today, the reset is in shambles, while many in Moscow accuse Washington of allowing the partnership to deteriorate.

Indeed, much of the blame for the Russia-US fallout is due to Washington’s plans to place a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe, just miles from the Russian border. NATO, originally declaring its intention to cooperate with Russia on the project, remains intransigent, while even refusing to provide Moscow with a legal guarantee that the system will never be aimed at Russian territory.

Moscow rightly warned its Western partners that without Russia’s participation in the system the strategic balance would be upset and there would be another arms race. Still, US and NATO officials have been reluctant to bring Russia on board, and this refusal has played havoc with Moscow’s and Washington’s efforts to nurture a reset between the former Cold War enemies.

In fact, given the current stalemate, the reset itself seems to have been merely a ploy to win Russia’s trust at the same time that a threatening military technology was being introduced courtesy of the Obama administration.

Meanwhile, China, which recently celebrated the launch of its first aircraft carrier (the US Navy already has six carriers assigned to the Pacific), is witnessing a growing US naval presence in the Pacific.

The US military brass announced in June that up to 60 per cent of the Navy's fleet will be deployed to the Pacific by 2020.

At the same time, Moscow and Beijing hold similar positions on a variety of other international issues, including the situation in Syria, where militants are attempting to force President Bashar Assad from power. Russian and Chinese diplomats have called for a general ceasefire followed by negotiations, whereas the United States has thrown its weight behind the opposition.

“Moscow and Beijing both hold similar positions on the global hotspots, including in Syria, North Korea, Afghanistan and Iran,” Evgeny Bazhanov, president of the Diplomatic Academy of Russia’s Foreign Ministry, told RT in an earlier interview. “They are also both deeply suspicious of the US missile defense system.”

Finally, the China-Russia relationship is motivated by other factors aside from their increasing wariness of American geopolitical intentions.

For example, considering China’s exploding economy, Beijing requires a reliable flow of oil and gas. Russia, meanwhile, welcomes the opportunity to diversify its ample supply of natural resources.  

Interstate consultations on strategic issues between Russia and China were launched in 2005.

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (52)

Alex (unregistered) 21.01.2013 22:59

So the abomination that is the US foreign policy is driving Moscow and Beijing into  each others arms. This should be good news for everyone around the world except those who are tied in military defense p acts with Washington.
Under stand this simple fact: America was able to push its interests around the globe not because it stood on the right side of history or that it did all good by everyone. US had a huge bargaining ch ip which was: you give me what I want, and I will open my domestic markets up for you to sell stuff. Ask the Koreans, they still have a trade pact where US cant sell them virtually any thing, yet Korean goods are everywhere in US.That paradigm is gone, China will be the biggest economy soon; and they are diligently working on further developing their domestic market. So, put 2 and 2 together and you have an irrelevant US in Asia. This latest US pivot is more a desperate cry, "hey guys I'm still here, please don't forge t me please!"

0

Undo

peace (unregistered) 21.01.2013 16:58

You know Chinese well?China has not invaded any country。 Now China formed an alliance with Russia, againstthe United States of America Rampant behavior

0

Undo

masterbaker25 14.01.2013 22:49

Years ago I had written that Russia China Japan India, Iran and all the countries in this region should set up a EuroAsian Economic-Military Zone, called the United Euro-Asiansian States, with a coomon and regional monies/armies/passsp orts. Japan would join and Russia perhaps could sell a small land to Japan to relocate Japaneese as their Island may sink or float soon. It is not to confront USA global dominance, but to share global governing and relieve the USA as the sole global power house. It will eliminate wars and bring about a global peacefull coexistence, having African States Union, South American States Union , the EU, and so on.. Life will be better for all people, the rich can have their zillions, and the less fortunate can leave in peace,,,No need for wars, Russia hadshown to the world it conducts itself in true global leader's fashion. Russia need to be trusted and encouraged to take up more global responsibilities by helping to create to begin with ; THE EURO-ASIAN STATES. It should relieve the USA of its exhaustive duties, So the USA and the entire West can go back to live within its borders and means,,,The west could trade outside the borders of their Trade-Military Zone, but could carry no weapons or move armies as it would constitute war!! End of wars, end of strife for any political dogmas,, and let's face it, all politics is the legal term for institutionalised robbery/genocides/gr eed/lies/selfishness /dishonesty and unfairness,,, LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR AS YOURSLEF,,, !!! MUST REPLACE ALL POLITICS!!!!!!!!!

0

Undo

View all comments (52)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us