Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Russia slams ‘unbalanced’ EU resolution on presidential vote

Published time: February 17, 2012 09:12
Edited time: February 17, 2012 13:59
A presidential election campaign poster reads: "The 4th of March - The elections of the President of Russia" (RIA Novosti / Ruslan Krivobok)

Moscow has responded heatedly to a grab bag of complaints leveled against Russia by the European Parliament, which includes early criticism of next month’s presidential election, and a call to reinstate a disqualified candidate.

­Vladimir Chizhov, Russia's permanent envoy to the EU, slammed a European Parliament resolution, which lumps together an assortment of issues, including Russia’s stance on Syria, last December’s Duma elections, and presidential elections scheduled for March 4.

“The present resolution deals with the upcoming presidential election in Russia,” Chizhov told reporters on Thursday. “If the European lawmakers wanted to comment on the election so much, they should probably have waited for it to be carried through.”

Chizhov mentioned the contradictory nature of the “not always objective or balanced” document, which seems to be more a reflection of “sentiments among members of the European Parliament,” some of which he described as downright “volatile sentiments.”

“One passage points out the peaceful character of the demonstrations and rallies that took place in Moscow and some of our other cities without interference from the authorities,” Chizhov noted. “Another passage speaks about the dispersal of some demonstrations.”

Without attempting to investigate the motives behind such contradictory assertions, the diplomat said he would leave it “on the conscience of the European parliamentarians.”

Meanwhile, Andrei Klimov, chairman of the lower house's international affairs committee, questioned the part of the resolution that calls for liberal politician Grigory Yavlinsky – disqualified from the race following campaign violations, which Yavlinsky himself admitted – to be counted among the presidential candidates.

"Evidently someone in Brussels decided to support friends from the so-called Russian opposition who periodically run to the European Union to complain," Klimov said.

The Russian lawmaker mentioned that “PACE observers, who recently visited Moscow, found no special problems with the presidential campaign so far.”

“The resolution was passed at the height of the election campaign [in Russia], which can be qualified as “a factor of pressure,” the parliamentarian stressed.

Chizhov, drawing attention to the Occupy Wall Street protests in the United States, questioned why the European Parliament was not shoveling out criticism of foreign governments on an equal basis.

"For some reason, the European Parliament has not responded to the clearly disproportionate use of force in the United States in the dispersal of protests in 110 cities, where more than 6,000 people were detained,” he said.

Chizhov went on to address certain current events inside the EU.

“It also happens quite often that the European Parliament doesn't react to developments in EU member states,” he said. “In this sense, it will be interesting to see the reaction of the European Parliament to a planned referendum expected to be held in Latvia.”

Latvia, which has a large Russian-speaking community, will vote on whether to make Russian the second official language, in a referendum scheduled to take place on February 18.

It would be praiseworthy if members of the European Parliament paid more attention to shortcomings of democracy within the European Union itself and in other countries, the diplomat added.

Chizhov also mentioned that European Parliament resolutions discuss issues “that have nothing to do with the declared theme of a resolution.”

"If it's about the election, what does the UN vote on Syria have to do with this? What do the rights of religious organizations have to do with it?" the Russian envoy asked.

Reminding his European colleagues that “President Dmitry Medvedev…stated the Russian position on such votes eloquently enough at a news conference after December's Russia-EU summit in Brussels," Chizhov went on to say that “such resolutions are, naturally, in no way binding on the Russian side and are of no practical significance for us."

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (50)

Marzipan6 (unregistered) 24.02.2012 11:21

Mah, you say my description of the Bronze Night  "sounds like propaganda." This depends on what you're measuring it against. All that I wrote is factual, and can be verified from any relevant news or historical source, Russian propaganda excepted. That, unfortunately, inhabits a world of its own where facts don't matter. But if you have accepted Russia's inventions as fact, real facts might very well sound like propaganda. At least, that is what the purveyors of Russian anti-Baltic lies hope, and in your case they seem to have succeeded.

As for "deaths" "imprisonment" and "abuse", one person died in the Bronze Night events.  One. He was a Russian youth, a part of a gang that was smashing shop windows in Tallinn and looting the contents. He was found stabbed, with his pockets filled with goods stolen from a nearby looted shopfront. Despite investigations, his killer/s were never found. It is possible that they were some of his own drunken mates who got into an argument about sharing the loot.

Rioters were indeed arrested on those couple of nights, and detained in a warehouse for lack of available  police cells (Tallinn doesn't have or need many of those). There is no evidence of abuse of arrested people, nor any reports of this from the large contingent of journalists on the scene. Such allegations come only from the usual Russian propaganda screech. Check it out. Some think the police used too much force against rioters, but rioters always think that.

I already explained that my "poisonous allegations" comment referred to usual Russian anti-Baltic propaganda, not specifically to the current article.  I have also mentioned my acquaintance with many problems in Estonia. I do not idealize it. I simply point out that Estonia is nothing  at all like Russia misrepresents it to be. Visit it, and you'll know.

As for cross-border invasions, yes, more or less every nation has done it. But your mention of Germany is a poor choice. Germany has acknowledged its Nazi era crimes, does not distort history, has investigated and purged itself of Nazi era state criminals, has reconciled with its former victims, has outlawed the Nazi party and regalia, has no Nazis in parliament, and is not led by a former Gestapo officer. Russia fails on each of these counts in regard to its Soviet era equivalents. Therefore Germany inspires trust and respect amongst its neighbours. Russia does not.

+1

Undo

Mah 23.02.2012 10:45

Oh and I must just mention this because my good morals prevent me from not doing so.  Your apologizing of the deaths which occured around the Bronze Night Event and the imprisonment and abuse and the general white-washing of it is actually literally revolting.  I can assure you, as someone who has read on the subject, very few Russians feel thankful for the gross and hideous manner the Estonian authorities and people conducted the matter and things are far from, once again, as idyllic as you try to make them out to be.  Marzipan6 reading your comments would lead one to believe that Estonia is some sort of egalitarian paradise which I can assure you it is not.  It is better than many countries in some regards and worse in others.  Like all other countries.  The superiority which you seem to give to Estonia above Russia smacks of either an inferiority complex or downright discrimination.  ; But my real question to you remains what is wrong with this article?  On what basis does the EU have the right to make such a scandalous and manipulative comment and why can Russia not react in such a way?  Please anwser my question.

0

Undo

Mah 23.02.2012 10:39

Yeah I'm going to be very frank with you but your description of the Bronze Night Event really just sounds like propaganda and a refusal to accept actual mistakes made by that country.  I can see getting you to accept that Estonia has serious problems is a pointless cause so i'm not gonna waste time on it.  Needless to say i disagree whole-heartedly.&nbs p; What you are pointing out is simply that Russia has attacked its neighbours often...like everyone else.  Should I record the number of times germanic based peoples or mongolian based peoples have invaded Russia or Russian ancestor groups?  Does that mean that Germany and Mongolia ahve some conspiratorial desire to conquer Russia?  No what it means is that, like all human history, countries invade their neighbours.  This is neither unique to Russia nor is it anymore laudable it is simply a fact of history.  You see some grand conspiracy when all that actually exists is historical based prejudice from both sides.  But I digress again my question is whether or not you were refering to this article as poisonous allegations.  You are blurring the actual point of contention by bringing up all these other points.  My question is do you believe this response by Russia to the EU to be a 'poisonous allegation'? You also seem to have forgotten that an equally virtulent stream of anti-russian propaganda emerges from Latvia and Estonia.  The world is nowhere near as black and white as you make it out to be my friend.

0

Undo

View all comments (50)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us