&host=rt.com&uri=/politics/russia-kremlin-mayor-response/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Moscow mayor accused of causing tension between president, premier
Published: 09 September, 2010, 14:30
Edited: 23 September, 2010, 18:52
Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov (RIA Novosti / Vitaliy Belousov)
TAGS: Medvedev, Putin, Russia, Politics
A Kremlin source has accused Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov of attempting to cause a conflict between the president and the prime minister.
Such attempts “of certain representatives of Moscow authorities will get a proper response,” the source in the presidential administration told Interfax on Wednesday.
Driving a wedge between the two leaders has no prospects, the source stressed. “It is unacceptable and it does not conform to the real relations between the head of state and the prime minister,” it added.
Attempts to cause a conflict could be found in a number of recent publications in the Russian media, the source explained. Luzhkov on Monday published an article in the government’s Rossiyskaya Gazeta daily, which was devoted to the construction of a new highway between Moscow and St. Petersburg.
The mayor supported the initial plan, approved by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, which envisages the construction through the Khimki Forest. In November last year, Putin signed a decree that made it possible to start the construction work.
Recently the premier said the highway should be built to solve transport problems. “There are always some problems between development and nature conservation,” Itar-Tass quoted him as saying. The government always pays attention to environmental protection issues, he added.
Luzhkov described the construction as a test for the country’s ability to fulfill modernization. Earlier reports had said the mayor was ready to support alternative projects.
President Dmitry Medvedev said on Wednesday that the decision on the route of the highway through the forest must be based on both economic and environmental considerations. He had ordered to carry out additional expertise. Expert agencies and public organizations should be involved in this work, the president noted.
Medvedev also highlighted the role of civil society in preserving forests. Itar-Tass quoted him as saying: “People worry not only about economic conditions, but also think about what might happen in the future, so they unite to resolve environmental problems.”
Last weekend, the Kremlin did not congratulate the mayor on the City Day celebrated in Moscow. At the end of August, Vedomosti daily reported that the presidential council for financial market development had rejected Luzhkov’s initiative to spend some 4 trillion rubles ($130 billion) over the next ten years on modernizing Moscow’s transport system.
Sergey Borisov, RT
09.09.2010, 02:16
Britain's envoy to Afghanistan steps downBritain's special envoy to Afghanistan, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, steps down from his position, amid speculation he was driven out because of his continued criticism of the military campaign. |
09.09.2010, 17:54
9 comments
Russia and Islam, without the hystericsAs much of the western world engages in heated polemics against Islam in general and Muslims in particular, Russia’s relations with its large Muslim community seem to be maturing. Medvedev-Obama |
Marzipan6 I am sure you know that Moscow is not just any other city! There is only one Moscow, one Red Sqauare in the World. Moscow is powerful. Moscow speeks [Govorit Moskva]! Now, Do you think that the Mayor of New York, Mr. Bloomberg has no influence over how things are run in Washington or over in Wall Street? At any case, we agree that his mayor is toxic and divisive and that he must go but you see only bad things when it comes to Russia and Russians.
Off-hand, I can't think of another country in the world where a city mayor can cause a rift between a president and a premier.Where rule of law applies and governance is by entities that are separate and distinct constitutionally as well as practically, no city mayor has that kind of power. But in countries where personalities are all-important and constitutional stipulations serve more as window-dressing, the opposite might apply. In which case the root cause of the matter is to be solved neither by making peace with nor by eliminating ("liquidating", I think, was the traditionally favoured term in Russia, was it not?) inconvenient personalities, but by allowing the rule of law, based on the country's constitutional requirements, to run its course.
The power of this old Matjor is clear from his face. It is scary face. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100913/160573756.html