VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   “New division” of Russia proposed to save small towns – paper  
MORE ON THE STORY
17.06.2009, 14:17

Pikalyovo touches on plight of Russia’s ‘monocities’

The North western town of Pikalyovo has come to symbolize the towns across Russia for which the collapse of a major industry or employer has meant dire straits for the whole community.

29.10.2009, 16:00 1 comment

ROAR: Russia to face “agony of single-industry towns”

Social and economic factors will prevent those living in “monotowns” from moving to other places, analysts warn.

“New division” of Russia proposed to save small towns – paper

Published: 16 November, 2010, 16:00
Edited: 16 November, 2010, 21:24

(14.9Mb) embed video

TAGS: Medvedev, Russia, Politics, Prime Time Russia, Modernization, Ivor Bennet, Economy


If a new program, which is being reportedly considered by the government works out, Russians will live in 20 agglomerations rather than in the present 83 regions.

The president’s administration and the government “are working to improve Russia’s territorial organization,” Vedomosti daily said on Tuesday. Instead of the current administrative division of the country into 83 regions, 20 agglomeration may be created, where resources are concentrated, according to the paper’s sources in the government.

The head of state may touch this topic in his annual address to the Federal Assembly later this year, the paper said. However, the president’s press secretary  Natalia Timakova has neither confirmed nor denied the news, declining to comment the information to the paper on the ideas that could be included in the address.  

“To change the country’s map is a necessary, but not easy task,” an anonymous source in the government told the daily. “Everything should be done very cautiously, as any division may lead to the struggle for investment resources,” he warned.

The current territorial organization of the country is not perfect, the document obtained by the paper reads. There are villages that have more population than towns, and the government is not able to distribute the budget resources in the right way because of “the regional disorder.” 

According to the document, criteria of the population size should be determined for cities and villages, as well as criteria for distribution of regional branches of federal bodies around the country.

Currently, 90 per cent of Russian towns have population less than 100,000 people. The work of more than half of plants and factories there “is adapted to one segment of the market,” the document reads, referring to single industry towns, or “monotowns.”

The alleged program states that developing small towns has no prospects. Instead, it suggests creating “general conditions for migrating of the population from monotowns to big cities, and thus, ensuring the transfer or urbanization to a new level.”     

The proposed structure may include 20 big agglomerations populated by more than a million people each. Cities and towns inside an agglomeration could be linked by united transport systems and will form united trade, educational and cultural spaces even without creating a single municipal body.   

The current legislation does not make it possible to form agglomerations as it contradicts the system of budgetary relations between the federal center and regions. The boundaries between possible agglomerations does not cover the present administrative division of the country either.

However, a territorial budget could be changed if a referendum is held on the creation of an agglomeration, Anatoly Kononov, a former member of the Constitutional Court, told Vedomosti.

Creating agglomerations is “a natural process in the whole world,” believes Marina Udachina, director of the Institute of Innovations, Infrastructure and Investments.

Meanwhile, political scientist Evgeny Minchenko told the paper that the initiative may be prepared for an election campaign. A big reform may “demonstrate that the country is not in stagnation, and it is moving to something big and better.”

It is not clear how the new reported project could affect the lives of ordinary Russians. Agglomerations will not eliminate small towns, but, on the contrary, will further their development, the authors of the program believe.

President Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday that “monotowns” could be saved by private business. The government should conduct a targeted work with every such town, attracting business and actively solving problems there, he told during a meeting with first deputy prime minister Igor Shuvalov. 

“It is not easier for people who live there to think that someone some time decided to create a city with one enterprise,” Medvedev stressed. “We should change this situation, your pilot program to support monotowns must be fulfilled.” 

More towns should be included in the government’s pilot project, Medvedev said, adding that each such town should have a different program of development.

­Sergey Borisov, RT
+1 (7 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
RIA Novosti / Olga Balashova 16.11.2010, 15:53

Russia and Ukraine revive war games

Ukraine and Russia are set to resume joint military exercises, Ukrainian Defense Minister Mikhail Yezhel has said.

Bangkok: Alleged Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout arrives at a Criminal Court in Bangkok on October 5, 2010. (AFP Photo / Nicolas Asfouri) 16.11.2010, 16:20 1 comment

Thailand suffers Bout of insanity

Bangkok officials, without proper notification to Russian diplomats in Thailand, whisked alleged Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout out of the country today on a US-bound aircraft.

Viktor Bout case
Reader November 20, 2010, 14:04
0

Maybe the idea with creating points of growth is sensible from the free market prospective but it is not from the real life prospective: imagine that there will be approximately 100 million people who for a long period of time will not get their jobs, will not have roads, will not have schools, etc. Why? Because they do not fit in in the new modern economy. What should they do? Just sit back and enjoy the gradual decay, because it is their fault in the end. Who asked them to go these remote places? Oh, wait there will be private (why do you think not the state?) businessmen who will rush to help them in droves.I am very very disappointed with the announced plans. For me it renders the responsible people incompetent and impotent.

Reader November 20, 2010, 14:02
0

I do not remember when was the last time I saw a road being built in Russia outside of the large cities which are an exception to this general rule when nothing happens to the old Soviet roads, houses and factories. This has a negative impact on the economy. For example: costs of shipping something via an international courier to some remote Russian area are exorbitant, monthly magazines arrive with a monthly lag via a Russian post, there are some places where you should have a tractor in order to reach your destination, i.e. the infrastructure sorely needs investment.

Reader November 20, 2010, 14:01
0

@EnriqueIt is always a question of costs, but also it is the question of the desire (whici is apparently lacking) and efficiency. Back in the USSR whole new towns were built from scratch, new roads, new factories, etc. Currently most that the present dreamers achieved is using the old Soviet infrastructure which did miracles for them and for their utopian free market ideas. But in the end it turns out that something should be nonetheless built and it is not possible to always live off the old legacy. Here is where the whole modernization idea comes in and such plans like this one begin to emerge.