&host=rt.com&uri=/politics/russia-tackle-climate-change/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Russia defines ways to tackle climate change
Published: 17 December, 2009, 15:06
Edited: 26 December, 2009, 19:06
TAGS: Natural resources, Ecology, Health, Medvedev, Russia, Politics, Economy
President Medvedev has signed a climate doctrine that sets measures Russia will take to avoid the possible consequences of climate change, his aide Arkady Dvorkovich has told a media conference.
The doctrine was signed on Wednesday, prior to Dmitry Medvedev’s visit to Copenhagen to attend the UN climate change conference.
The document was developed by Russia’s Ministry of Natural resources. According to Dvorkovich, it analyzes challenges the country may face in case of climate change.
The tricky issue of the interconnection between climate policy and the country’s energy sector has also been examined.
“If the participants of the Copenhagen conference choose the path of limitations, that will become some kind of a tax for Russian energy industry, oil, gas and coal production,” Dvorkovich said.
He said the Doctrine deals mainly with the measures necessary to be taken in order to make the economy more energy-efficient.
One of the serious tasks, he said, is the modernization of the state economy, implementing innovative technologies in all the fields that the President mentioned in his address to the Federal Assembly.
“We have to begin the modernization and technological upgrade of the entire manufacturing sphere. I am convinced this is a matter of survival for our country in the modern world,” Medvedev said in his address.
The climate doctrine provides a more detailed description of the directions for work. Russia intends to increase energy efficiency by 40 per cent by 2020. According to researchers’ estimates, raising efficiency by one unit leads to emissions decrease by 1 pre cent.
Finally, the Doctrine suggests ways to tackle the climate problem. According to Russian scientists, the human impact on climate has not been studied in full. A major part of climatic changes results from global natural trends and it is likely they will continue. “Therefore, we have to take measures,” Dvorkovich said.
Even though risks of flooding are relatively low in Russia compared to island states, in some regions, floods are quite possible. That refers primarily to permafrost regions in Russia’s north, which may be endangered if ice starts melting. The doctrine provides for financing monitoring in those areas and help in case of emergency.
Climate change, Dvorkovich said, may seriously affect agriculture, forestry and other spheres. “In some areas, changes can be positive, in others – negative,” he added.
Also, the authors of the document looked at the impact of climate on human health and the challenges that may arise from that.
The fulfillment of the doctrine will be controlled by Russia’s government and the Security Council.
17.12.2009, 15:02
32 comments
“NATO will never attack Russia” – RasmussenNATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has visited Moscow to seek greater assistance from Moscow for the military effort in Afghanistan. His main argument was that the alliance does not consider Russia as an enemy. |
17.12.2009, 15:19
31 comments
Georgia smashes history for new parliament siteA memorial to Georgians who died in World War Two is going to be taken down in the Georgian city of Kutaisi to make way for a building that will house parliament when it is relocated from the capital Tbilisi. |
Let us not worry about Worldwide-mondialisation' shame. The Copenhagen conference should have dealt with human's behavior, not climat's change. The russian government seems to have taken the good option. This could make Russia: the good example, mankind so desperatly needs. It is evident that underdevelopped countries need help. Most advanced states' leaders balked to give 30 billions in three year for developping permanent energies in those countries. In 2010, mankind will waste nearly 1500 billions $ on armaments and wars (1000 just for the USA). Why did any important decisions' maker mentionned that insanity in Copenhagen ?
I was at first perplexed that Russia is playing this game. But upon reading this carefully, the science has been given its due. And it is vey prudent to act on cleaner air, modernization of industry, more energy efficiency. Given the Norhern Hemisphere's more moderate climate that will continue. I am pleased to hear the healthy doze of scepticism for the sake of giving science a chance.
I agree with Artyom, but Slava says it best. Well put!