Fulfillment of New START depends on US missile defense plans – Foreign Ministry
Published: 07 February, 2011, 18:35
AFP Photo / Dima Kortayev
TAGS: Military, Nuclear, Russia, Politics, USA
Russia will consider the expediency of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty if the US steps up its unilateral missile defense program, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said.
Moscow has confirmed that although there is no direct link between offensive arms reduction and missile defense in the treaty, Russia will be closely watching the moves of its Western partners.
If the US “increases the size and quality” of missile defense individually or together with NATO, this would mean the situation has changed, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said at a news conference on Monday. Then, Russia will have to consider if it should further comply with the treaty, he warned. Moscow may also take other measures, including military and technical, in response to the new situation.
The START treaty that took effect last week, limits both Russia and the US to 1,550 strategic warheads. The previous ceiling was 2,200.
Currently, Russia considers it premature to start negotiating the reduction of tactical nuclear weapons until other disarmament issues are solved. At the same time, Russia is ready to discuss further reductions of strategic weapons in the future, not only with the United States but also with other nuclear powers. “It would be better to start with withdrawal of US tactical nuclear weapons from Europe,” Ryabkov said. This move would build confidence, he noted.
According to the deputy foreign minister, Russia sees no “acute need” to disclose information on the number of strategic offensive armaments. Under New START, the exchange of such information is confidential. A substantial part of this data had already been transferred to the US side within earlier agreements.
As for claims the US would be transferring details of British nuclear armaments to Russia, Ryabkov said Moscow and Washington never had such a deal. Russia would welcome certain transparency in that area, but the two sides have no such agreement, he said, refuting the Daily Telegraph report. The newspaper on Saturday cited WikiLeaks as saying that the US allegedly had a secret deal with Russia on the transfer of information regarding the British nuclear forces.
Police reform in action: lack of funds, plenty of hurdlesAs the new Law on Police has been given the green light, the Interior Ministry has many difficulties to overcome, implementing the reform’s initial tasks. |
Russian priest intends to run for mayorThe first priest may be allowed to run in the mayoral election in the Kostroma Region, but the Russian Orthodox Church is unlikely to give him its blessing. |
It would be good practice that other military
nuclear powers give information about the
number and type of warheads they possess.
Only then the world will be safer as at the
moment countries such as Britain and Israel are
not transparent when it comes to declare their
nuclear arsenal.
Count Cash I must agree and this is the saddest statement I can make.
I hoped America would realize the future is not about the old way. It is a new idea with young who have never understood these old dirty throwaway rags now, Kissinger and his entire ilk of toadies.
The young of America in the majority do not follow the leaders as those of yesterday.
Who in their right mind that is a healthy young American would look to the likes of Dick Cheney to lead the path of a new world order! Yikes his old world order is never far from a hospital to keep the Darth Vader machine running! Young Americans all watched Star Wars and know who ultimately takes the lead --- and it is not any of these people who can barely waddle let alone walk a path of courage in the future.
That should make a very clear and bold statement about why not to follow a human being leading the new way: no heart.
No minds mean no thinking stuff and the machines are using too much non-humane for the idea of equality.






It looks like all the grand announcements to the world of the new START commitment may just turn out to be blank words ultimately. Sad.