&host=rt.com&uri=/politics/soviet-occupation-day-moldova/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Moldovan leader refuses to annul Soviet Occupation Day
Published: 28 June, 2010, 17:16
Edited: 30 June, 2010, 18:36
TAGS: Anniversary, Politics, History
Moldova’s acting President and Parliament Speaker Mihai Ghimpu, known for his sweeping pro-Romanian rhetoric and policies, said he would not annul his decree declaring June 28 Soviet Occupation Day.
According to the decree, June 28 could now be known for Moldovans as Soviet Occupation Day – one that will be marked as a day of nationwide mourning.
“We did not come to power to echo those who think June 28 was the day of liberation. It was the day of Soviet occupation and this must be said in clear terms. If we came to power and if we want to be sovereign and independent, we must speak the truth,” Ghimpu said on Monday morning as he was laying flowers at a memorial stone “for victims of the communist regime.”
The monument was set up on Sunday on the instructions of Ghimpu's relative, city Mayor Dorin Chirtoaca, in the central square of Chisinau.
“We will not annul the decree. May each one act the way he deems proper. I, as acting president, have already made my position clear on this,” Ghimpu added.
A number of citizens repressed in the Soviet period supported the acting president's ordinance near the parliament building on Monday. They were holding a banner, which read, “Stalin and Russian People Brought us Freedom – They Took us to Siberia.”
A special parliamentary meeting was supposed to be held on Monday to discuss the decree made by acting president and parliament speaker Mihai Ghimpu. However, the meeting was cancelled by Moldova’s ruling Alliance for European Integration party.
This decision was met with strong words from the opposition Communist Party’s leader, Vladimir Voronin.
“We think that the Alliance for European Integration has become an opposition to the people, usurped power and supported Ghimpu. There is no difference who makes decisions and who signs ordinances. The entire Alliance for European Integration is responsible,” Voronin said.
Ghimpu’s move was initially met with opposition by the Alliance, who tried to cancel the decree on the grounds that the decision was made without consulting other members of the quadripartite coalition.
“Formally, there are two ways to cancel a decree: whether [Moldova's acting president Mihai] Ghimpu cancels it or the Constitutional court does, which the acting opposition on the part of the Communist Party appealed to,” Moldovan Democratic Party leader Marian Lupu said.
The legality of the decree signed only on June 24 will be checked by the country's Constitutional Court and will decide its fate, Lupu declared after a joint conference held on Monday morning with the participation of members of the ruling coalition and acting president Ghimpu.
Many saw the Alliance’s initial attempts to cancel the decree as the first sign of its impending dissolution. But, in the end, the special parliamentary hearing didn’t push through and the three members of the quadripartite alliance failed to convince Moldova’s acting president that the ordinance marking June 28 as Soviet Occupation Day must be repealed.
Opposition cries foul, demands Ghimpu’s resignation
The decree came under heavy criticism by the opposition party of Moldovan communists and other leftwing parties who called on the Moldovan parliamentarians to dismiss the acting president.
Leader of the opposition’s majority party, the Communist Party, Vladimir Voronin has demanded the immediate resignation of Ghimpu.
“This man has proven his inability to govern the country more than once. He became the president by accident and he disgraces this country. He must step down immediately because his actions disagree with the opinion of the overwhelming majority of citizens,” Voronin told a press conference on Monday.
In fact, recent polls show that Ghimpu's popularity rating is less than 2%. Ghimpu was made acting Moldovan leader in September 2009 when the country's liberal-democratic coalition was forced to find a compromise after failing to appoint another candidate.
Leaders of the Gagauz autonomy, the city of Beltsy – the second biggest city of Moldova – and a number of other Moldovan towns refused to comply with Ghimpu's decree on Soviet Occupation Day.
Ghimpu’s order was also criticized by Justice Minister Alexandru Tanase, vice president of another Alliance party led by Prime Minister Vlad Filat.
Meantime, the Russian Foreign Ministry has described the Ghimpu move as “blasphemous” and regarded Moldova's decision as an element of “a preplanned political campaign spearheaded against Russian-Moldovan partnership.”
Ghimpu’s rules
The decree of marking June 28 as Soviet Occupation Day was proclaimed last Thursday by Mihai Ghimpu, who also ordered “a monument to victims of Soviet occupation and the totalitarian communist regime to be erected in front of the government building.”
Ghimpu has denied the accusations of trying to gain political assets by issuing such a decree.
“I have not hurt anyone by my decree declaring June 28 the day of Soviet Occupation of Moldova” Ghimpu said at the ceremony for unveiling the Memorial Stone to Victims of Soviet Occupation.
“I am not trying to gain political assets by this decree. A decree is not an action against the Communist Party of Moldova, it is aimed against Soviet and Communist symbols, which have hurt many families in Moldova that were taken to Siberia during Stalin’s repressions,” Ghimpu said.
The decree states that on June 28, Moldovan state flags should be lowered to half-mast and mourning ceremonies should be held allover the country to mark the day when Moldova was transferred from Romanian to Soviet jurisdiction on June 28, 1940. It also stipulates in its last clause that Russia as a legal successor to the former Soviet Union should immediately “pull out its troops from Moldova.”
_______________________________________
Fact box
Russia’s peacekeeping contingent is stationed in Transdniester, the republic’s breakaway region. In addition to the peacekeeping mission, the roughly 1,500-men-strong OGRV also guards stores with weaponry which belonged to the Soviet Union and now is Russia’s property. Part of it has already been transported to Russia.
Shortly before the collapse of the Soviet Union, on September 2, 1990, five regions located mostly in a strip between the Dniester River and the eastern Moldovan border with Ukraine declared the creation of the Republic of Transdniester. The Moldovan leadership did not approve of the move and sent troops into the region, which resulted in a military conflict in 1992 .
Currently the peace in the conflict region is maintained by Russian, Moldovan and Transdniester' peacekeeping contingents and by Ukrainian monitors.
_______________________________________
On June 28, 1940, at the USSR’s request, Romania withdrew its troops from Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina, which it had been occupying since 1918, and the region joined the Soviet Union. The Moldovan Soviet republic, including six Bessarabia districts as well as six areas from the left bank of the Dniester, was established in August 1940.
Tesa Arcilla, RT
28.06.2010, 15:46
Medvedev sums up Canadian top-rank gatheringsTallying up the results of the G8 and G20 summits in Canada, President Medvedev has said both the gatherings were productive and a number of crucial topics including finance, ecology and nuclear security were discussed. |
28.06.2010, 17:48
Moscow hits back at Berlin over spying allegationsRussia’s Foreign Ministry has said it expects an explanation from Berlin over the “groundless” accusations of industrial espionage on the territory of Germany. |
It's like the FIFA world cup; was it over the line, was it not, was it offside was it not. But unlike the world cup, there's no crowd watching or caring - quite sad really! Just a load of Balls. But maybe a better approach would be the circus -'He's behind you' and get the kids cheering! The Moldovian National Circus - I suppose now the Ukrainian one is disbanded, the region is missing a bunch of clowns and a good laugh!
Leaving aside the question of whether or not Moldova suffered a Soviet occupation, Russia needs to grow out of its schizophrenic self-perceptions. Whenever Soviet successes are under discussion, Russia enthusiastically embraces these as its very own and celebrates these to the skies, like each May in Moscow. Yet whenever Soviet crimes are on the agenda, Russia gets absolutely livid and emphatically tells all and sundry that the Soviet Union and Russia were/are two entirely separate and distinct countries. Make up your mind, Russia – you can’t have it both ways at once. If Moldova was occupied by the Soviet Union, why does Russia get upset at that idea – what has the Soviet Union got to do with Russia? If the answer is, “nothing,” then what business does Russia have ostentatiously celebrating the Soviet victory of WW2? But what really takes the prize is the Russian Foreign Ministry’s grandiously pompous description of Moldova’s reference to a Soviet occupation as “blasphemous”. I thought blasphemy was an offense against God. It seems that Russia’s identity crisis goes well beyond just a Soviet/not Soviet question.
Your analogy is flawed, CountCash. It capitalises on mistaken umpiring that sometimes happen in football, but these are mistakes based on clear, consistent and unchanging rules. There are no consistent rules in Russia’s judgment of its Soviet past. For example, the Russian Federation is not consistently heir of the Soviet Union – Soviet successes are enthusiastically embraced and celebrated as Russian successes, but Soviet crimes miraculously become the deeds of an alien, non-existent country, and have nothing to do with Russia. The same with Soviet heroes and villains. Gagarin, for example, continues to be celebrated as the quintessential Russian; the imprisoners, torturers, deporters and killers of Baltic women and children are seemingly not Russian at all, and worse, not a one of them has been convicted and punished by the Russian establishment like Gagarin has been celebrated and heroized. Or take monuments. When Estonia respectfully moves a monument of Stalinist oppression from downtown Tallinn to a dignified military cemetery a few kilometres away and rededicates it as a memorial to all the victims of all wars in Estonia, Russians and Estonians included, Russian outrages reaches to the skies. But when Russians from 1945 onwards systematically destroyed (not relocated, but destroyed) monuments to the Estonian fallen in its 1918-20 War of Independence, that evokes absolutely zero reaction in Russia. It’s as if two entirely different sets of rules and standards apply. There are many similar examples I could cite. Your analogy would be more apt if you evoked a football game in which the umpire applied the rules precisely, but an entirely different set of rules applied to each team. Such Russian behaviour is extremely unlovely to non-Russians.