Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Four swear words outlawed by communications watchdog

Published time: December 25, 2013 13:29
RIA Novosti / Kirill Kallinikov

RIA Novosti / Kirill Kallinikov

Both print and online Russian media have been informed of the four swear words that must never appear either in articles or in readers’ comments. Newspapers and websites which don’t comply could lose their license.

The list of unprintable words was compiled by Roskomnadzor (Federal Supervision Agency for Information Technologies and Communications) and include:

Obscene terms for male genital organs, obscene terms for female genital organs, obscene terms for sexual intercourse and obscene terms for a woman of easy virtue, as well as all of the derivatives from the above mentioned words,” a watchdog’s document reads, as cited by Izvestiya daily.

All the other explicit words and phrases will be allowed if content they appear in is marked with a 16+ age limit. In the case of TV and radio, users of bad language will only be able to have their say after 9 pm.

Once detected in an article, the unprintable word will result in the media receiving a warning. At least two warning in 12 months could lead to the watchdog suing the outlet in court, seeking the withdrawal of its license.

Roskomnadzor, currently monitoring 5,000 media outlets in Russia, takes a softer approach to obscenities in readers’ opinions posted online. A warning will only be issued if the media does not agree to a request to either edit or delete a comment containing one of the four outlawed words.

The Roskomnadzor list comes as a follow-up to the law banning swear words in mass media. The outlets now have a clearer vision over what exactly they may lose their license for.

The Rosbalt news agency has already been punished by Roskomnadzor. It did not remove links to YouTube videos, featuring people using strong language that the watchdog had issued warnings against. The Moscow city court stripped Rosbalt of its license in October.

Swear words were used 1133 time in Russian mass media during a two-year- period from July 2011 to July 2013, according to a report by the Mediologiya polling agency. That’s three words a day on average.

The online Snob project was mentioned in the report as one of the major contributors to the statistic. The project’s president, Nikolay Uskov, says the website removes swear words once notified by a supervising agency. However, he questions the regulation, saying it’s too hard to control content coming from readers, arguing swear words can be justified in direct speech.

When we speak about editorial content, then of course we should follow the commonly acceptable norms of literary language… But when we reproduce reality, namely people’s conversations - when we quote people – I don’t know what we should do,” Uskov told Kommersant FM radio.

The journalist community has hardly welcomed the regulation as many believe it gives too much power to Roskomnadzor, making any online outlet that receives comments from readers an easy target for persecution.

Comments (26)


Masha 08.04.2014 03:00

I like this law and the one simple truth behind it — once an obscenity, always an obscenity. Paint the words lovely, but history doesn't lie. For example, Free Press president Craig Aaron's R-rated post about the Internet's destiny resides on a well-respected, perhaps family-oriented (not anymore...) site, The Verge. Aaron gets praised as an honest person, no doubt — yet, criticism followed, in respect to children's safety and decorum within mass media. This new law covers those topics, reminding us of the reality that adults need their constraints, too, lest they lose their audience and ruin their own image.


Jack James 28.03.2014 17:05

The difference is that in the USA you don't get thrown in a forced labour camp when you use offensive language.


Michael 07.03.2014 20:38

Liberator 28.12.2013 13:51

"Newspap ers and websites which don’t comply could lose their license."

You mean the media has to get a LICENSE? From government? What on Earth happened to free speech?


The same more or less applies in America actually, I looked it up. Its not too strict, but it does basically outline behavior for a news agency to follow and basic tenets of appropriate speech, especially in regard to minority and religious groups.

View all comments (26)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us