Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Peacekeeping mission in Syria impossible – Moscow

Published time: December 17, 2012 15:03
Edited time: December 17, 2012 19:03
Free Syrian Army fighters pose at a tank after capturing the Military Infantry School following heavy clashes with forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad in Aleppo December 16, 2012. (Reuters / Zain Karam)

The UN is considering the deployment of a peacekeeping mission in Syria, but this operation cannot be implemented without a ceasefire between the sides, says Russia’s Vice Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov.

“There is neither peace [in Syria] for peacekeepers to keep, nor truce for them to monitor,” Gatilov told Interfax agency on Monday.

Earlier, it was reported the UN was planning to send up to 10,000 peacekeepers to Syria as an emergency measure.

According to the Russian Deputy FM, the UN contingency plan has been talked about over for some time as part of efforts for a settlement of the Syrian conflict. However, only the Security Council can give the go-ahead and only if certain conditions are met. In particular, the “receiving party” – the Syrian government – has to give its consent to the intervention.

The government has repeatedly opposed to the idea of peacekeepers as “there is no clear separation line between the conflicting sides” and the opposition forces get increasing military and financial support from outside the country,” Gatilov pointed out.

The opposition would also have to cooperate with the international contingent, he underlined. But President Assad’s opponents are against the plan as well.

“Apparently, they fear external monitoring of their military activities,” the senior Russian diplomat noted.

Moscow considers attempts to push resolutions authorizing the use of force in Syria – including those involving peacekeepers – through the UN Security Council as “unacceptable.”

“Our position is based on the need to observe the international law and to take into account historic experience,” the Deputy Foreign Minister said. “One-sided logic, as was the case with Iraq, as well as deliberate violations and free interpretations of UN resolutions, as was the case in Libya,” only seriously aggravate the situation, he added.

Comments (8)

johnk 22.12.2012 00:29

The Russians are right about the terrorist opposition being funded and supported by external forces (NATO, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey). If that support can be cut off, then the violence will end very quickly.

+2

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 18.12.2012 12:58

what we have here is a difference of opinion.  Some people think that country belongs to all of the people who live there and that the state is required to treat them equally.  Other people believe that a country belongs to a dominant group and that the ruling class is required to manage the people as a herd of wild cattle grazing on the land.

People of the first group do not consider a country valid if the herd is unhappy.  People of the second group see any attempt to influence the herd as destabilaztion.

Historically, the world has been dominated by the second group since the pharohs.  However, that started changing when the americans broke from England and drafted a successful ecnomic model for free range cattle.  It capitalized upon happy cows for increased productivity and creativity.  This led to a wave of revolutions and wars.  Some, like the French, ended successfully after a bloody transformation.  Some, like the English, adapted peacefully. Others, like the Russian, were hijaaked and turned back towards the second group.  Now, as a person scans the international scene, the first group outnumbers the second group by about 170 to 30. 

Most of the mideast is in the second group.  Arab spring is actually a very angry group of cattle.  They are stampeding and demanding to be part of the first group.  The stampede is spreading to every country where the cattle are not well fed and pampered.  Assad is yelling "wolf" and shooting any cattle that stray.  It only made the stampede worse. 

Nobody, not even from group two, actually believes that they are wolves.  Assad is still trying to regain the herd by slaughtering any of them who do not obey.  The real question is "at what point should the free range cattle of the world join with those of Syria?"

As regards Iran and Russia.  Make no mistake.  They are group two.  Their bigest fear is that their own cattle may someday demand happiness and freedom.

0

Undo

Eurasian (unregistered) 18.12.2012 10:58

(correction): Another foolish try as it was done in Yugoslavia, a NATO “peace keeping forces” who encouraged the hostilities/conflict s and not the ceasefire.

+2

Undo

View all comments (8)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us