Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

US senators lobbying for NATO missile defense radar in Georgia

Published time: February 04, 2011 15:52
Edited time: February 04, 2011 20:08

Four US Republican senators consider Tbilisi as a reliable partner which could host a missile defense radar “aimed at Iran.”

­Senators Jon Kyl, James Risch, Mark Kirk and James Inhofe have called on Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to consider the Republic of Georgia as a potential host for the TPY-2 missile defense radar.

Earlier, the US administration chose Turkey for the radar site. However, Ankara would agree to host it only if the US does not share the gathered information with Israel. Washington cannot agree to any such limitation, the senators said in a letter, dated February 3 and published by the Cable blog of The Foreign Policy magazine.  

The politicians recommend the US administration to consider alternate sites and say Georgia’s geographic location would make it an ideal place for a radar aimed at Iran. It would better protect the US from possible long range missile launches than Turkey or other countries of southeastern Europe, the senators believe.

They also described Tbilisi as a significant partner for defense cooperation “as a future member of NATO or in another capacity.” The senators also want Gates to advise them if the administration is considering Georgia as a potential participant in the missile defense program.

This letter suggests that the new Congress may be more interested in military cooperation with Tbilisi after it slowed following the August 2008 conflict in the Caucasus. The list of senators who have already lobbied for more support to Georgia includes John McCain, Joe Lieberman and Richard Lugar.

It is clear that any plans to place the radar in Georgia will be rebuked by Moscow. It has always opposed calls by some in the US to rearm Tbilisi, especially following Georgia’s aggression against South Ossetia in 2008.    

The new TPY-2 radar is considered part of the NATO missile defense system that was discussed at the alliance’s Lisbon summit in November last year. Then the alliance officially invited Russia to take part in a joint missile defense program.

President Dmitry Medvedev welcomed the idea at the summit, but he stressed that Russia “should consider what it will be.” Moscow will participate in the joint project only if it acts as a partner and has equal rights with NATO.

Moscow had opposed the program of former US President George Bush’s administration to deploy elements of a missile defense shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. President Obama scrapped the plans.   

If Russia does not take part in the project, “we will have to defend ourselves,” Medvedev warned in Lisbon. Russia is still waiting for the details of NATO’s program. However, even Europeans do not seem to fully understand it.

Moscow has made its offers, and the ball is in NATO’s court, Medvedev said on January, 28. Russia’s position in a short time will depend on the reply from the alliance. Earlier, the president had warned that Russia would have to redeploy its nuclear missiles if NATO fails to agree on common missile defense. “We expect from our NATO partners a direct and unambiguous answer – where they see Russia’s place,” he said.

Comments (4)

PR101 06.02.2011 14:08

Fred Fred What you have described were once spoken in hushed voices; no more. There are voices within the American people who are speaking against the rise of the new elite—as supposed to the old New England settlers with the Protestant ethnics and concerns for the people. This new elite emerged after the end of WWII and the arrival of new class of European immigrants with strong Zionist commitment was reinforced by the militarization of the United States economy. Militarization of the economy also meant the militarization of education and militarization of the society. The greatest damage was done during the Cold War. During the Cold War, Europe and even Canada saw number near revolutionary struggles over access to fair and free education, living wages, free health case, against arms race. In the U.S, different kind of struggles took place- protest against the Vietnam- at the tail end of the war when draft threatened the middle class and civil rights and feminist movement—both of which took the sad turn of identity politics. When the Soviet Union collapsed we saw the neocons came out openly to problem American supremacy. Since there was never strong left in the U.S the neocons were able to quickly penetrate all spheres of the society and the U.S started wars of aggression in Latin America, ME, NATO expansion in Eastern Europe, destabilizing the Post Soviet space.. In the mean time no attention was paid to the economy and the rise of China. My view is when the war economy was providing good paying jobs for the majority of the people, the people went long with the war economy. We see the result of the war economy today.

0

Undo

Fred 06.02.2011 05:19

PR101: You are correct that our government is everything that you described, I must adsd that and I've said it many times, my country the US is run by the 1-2 % filthy rich who own 95% of the wealth and the politicians named in this article are just lobbyists for the Military Industrial Complex ; this one party system we have is just a political hoax controlled by the corporations and Zionists...their goals are not democracy,freedoms , or whatever.... 99% of the media is in the control of this same filthy rich who have the job of keeping the Americans ignorant and afraid of the "boogey man" and at the same time keeping them fighting among themselves over wedge issues like abortion, gays, gun rights, whether Obama was born in Kenya or a Socialist knowing well he is a Corporatist and pro-Zionist or else he would have never even been where he is today And as the US loses power in the Middle East as they have in Latin America the "filthy rich" become like a wounded beast more desperate and dangerous. fred oregon

0

Undo

Joey Tavares 06.02.2011 02:04

Wow, I bet no one saw this coming...
Ahem.

0

Undo

View all comments (4)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us