Era of confrontation with Russia over– Ukrainian President
Published: 29 April, 2010, 17:35
Edited: 05 August, 2010, 03:51
TAGS: Investment, Arms, Conflict, Meeting, Military, Scandal, Medvedev, Putin, Russia, Ukraine, Crisis, Protest, Politics, Law, Russia and the global economy, Budget, History, Yanukovich, Tymoshenko, Big deal, Economy, Gas
On Thursday Dmitry Medvedev and Viktor Yanukovich signed the bill ratifying the agreement on Russia’s Black Sea fleet in Ukraine.
On the Russian side, the document was accepted by the Lower House of the Russian Parliament on April 27 and approved by the Upper House on April 28.
Earlier the agreement was also ratified by the Ukrainian Parliament.
Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovich has said that he has managed to put relations with Russia on a new track of friendship and equality.
“After five years of portraying Russia as an enemy, it is not easy to regain the Russian leadership's confidence in Ukraine. But I have managed to do so, and now I am ready to tell my voters: from now on, dialogue with our big neighbour will be based on principles of equality, neighborliness and healthy pragmatism, rather than confrontation and anti-Russian rhetoric,” said Yanukovich in an address to the Ukrainian people following the extension of the Russian Black Sea Fleet's presence in Ukraine.
The agreements signed between the two presidents in Kharkov, prolong the lease of the Russian naval base in Ukraine’s Crimea for another 25 years, and in return will allow Ukraine to pay for Russian gas with a 30% discount.
Commenting on the deal, Yanukovich said that he does not think Ukraine paid too much for the agreement:
“Did we pay too much for that? No, because the agreements reached with Moscow are mutually beneficial.”
He also noted that not only the country’s economy as a whole, but also every citizen will benefit from the recent Kharkov agreements. “The document signed in Kharkov will ensure a significant reduction in the price of gas for us. This means higher social protection of every Ukrainian and the beginning of our economy's way out of a deep crisis,” said Yanukovich, adding that Europe will also benefit from this deal too as it “means guarantees of tougher energy security” and the whole “civilized world” praised the deal and see it as “Ukraine's unconditional success.”
“Only our opposition remains unhappy. Why is it calling us to new barricades, why is it undermining stability that has been achieved for the first time in long years of endless wars between the chiefs of state? Because it is seeking once again to dissolve the parliament in the name of so-called political expediency, because it understands stability, a strong vertical structure of the government, order and normalization of our relations with Russia will mean its political death. It is once again striving for power at any cost,” said Yanukovich.
Following these statements, Ukrainian Ambassador to Russia Konstantin Grishchenko said that Ukraine wants to remain Russia’s friend and looks to develop mutual potentials, especially in the economy, as he sees Russia as a “key country to carry out key projects” with.
“It is necessary not only to remain Russia's friend, but also to do our best this friendship to develop mutual potentials,” said Grishchenko in an interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on Thursday.
He said that the agreements, signed in Kharkov, are to set a long-term roadmap for the development of the bilateral relations between the countries. Talking about the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Crimea, he has said that he does not see it as threat to national security and stressed that people’s sentiments about the issue should be taken into an account.
“There is and has never been a frozen conflict in the Crimea. On the contrary, the fact is that President Viktor Yanukovich did not receive so many votes, but in this region he should take into account the opinion of people who voted for him,” said Grishchenko.
However, while talking about improving relations with Russia, he also said that Ukraine’s future “will be in the European Union.”
“We seek to join the EU as soon as possible. However, we know that we could not enter the organization if we only knock at the door. Thus we concentrate our efforts on practical steps – on an association agreement, liberalization and, finally, a visa abolition agreement,” said the Ukrainian ambassador.
ROAR: PACE resolution on famine seen as success for Russian delegationPoliticians and analysts in Russia welcome the decision of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe not to recognize Holodomor as an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people. |
29.04.2010, 17:50
3 comments
History is for historians – Thorbjørn JaglandSecretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland believes officials cannot make political decisions on historic events. “We should look into the future,” he believes. |
April 30, 2010, 16:10, Vladimir wrote > Kihnu: A very well said, indeed. I fully agree that America is a rapidly collapsing empire and that it sails to some sort of desintegration. Its central government is too costly and it is a big question for how long the 52 states will be able to stand behind it. U. S. A. has 50 states, not 52.
April 30, 2010, 15:10, The Old Man wrote > Hopefully this will signal a return to 'order' in the Black Sea region. > I am not however convinced that the USA is finished with Ukraine, so we we may yet see some more sculdugery with Ukranian politics. > I shall also be watching developments in Georgia too as this issue will have percieved and actual implications for that country, especially the current governments designs upon becoming a US outpost (and allowing itself to become an Israeli 'staging post' / unsinkable carrier re pressuring Iran). We may even see the USA overcompensate by 'maunouvering' or 'wargaming' significant warships in the Black Sea close to Georgia. > Things may yet get interesting. Old Man, Do you mean like when Russia stages her ships outside US waters near Savannah? Or the proliferation of arms sales to to Venezuleua? I can't wait for the day when Chavez's "Russian" procurded S-300 blow an American airliner out of the sky! Let's call it Russian "pragmatism"!












I never knew there was a country called Ukraine. I had always though the inhabitants there were Russians. Never once did I thought Kiev residents were anything but pure Russians (I supposed you could blame it on the movie - Fiddler On The Roof!). The old maps hardly threw out Ukraine as a country but I supposed the distingeration of the USSR educated everyone even though I still associate the Ukrainians as Russians in many ways. Hard to conceive it as part of the modern prosperous Western Europeans!