Communists aim at winning Duma elections
Published: 26 July, 2011, 16:41
Gennady Zyuganov (RIA Novosti / Vladimir Fedorenko)
TAGS: Election, Russia, Politics, Opposition
The unopposed Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov has said his party intends to win Russia's December parliamentary elections, describing the current situation in the country as “feudalism” rather than “capitalism”.
In an interview with Kommersant newspaper, MP Zyuganov said he believes that the Russian Communist Party (KPRF) has every reason to be aiming to win the State Duma election and leave the ruling United Russia party behind. Recalling regional elections in March, the politician said that in the Nizhny Novgorod region for example, KPRF got about 55 per cent of the votes, which is 27 percent more than the Putin-led United Russia.
In answer to a question on what would happen to the KPRF if it got fewer votes than during previous elections, Zyuganov stated that it would be “wrong and tactless” even to ask about that.
“You know people's moods perfectly well. The party will get more [votes]. Significantly more,” the Communist leader said. The party's task is to safeguard that outcome, and for that reason, the KPRF has already started training 500 thousand election monitors.
This time, a new player will participate in the battle for seats in Russia's lower house – a recently created movement called the All-Russian Popular Front. Led by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, the Front includes members from United Russia, and has also gathered quite a large number of supporters, including businessmen, celebrities, trade unions members, youth's groups and even turncoats from opposition parties. The novelty of the Putin-initiated idea is that United Russia will offer a share of its seats in the Duma to active members of the Popular Front, even if they are not members of the party.
Zyuganov, though, remains quite confident that the Popular Front will not spoil the Communists' game. He recalled that over the past 20 years, the authorities changed their “jacket” every time “it had to answer for what had been done”.
“I used to think that United Russia would be earnest and last for a long time. While everything was fine, they repeatedly stated that “We know how to do everything …we are responsible for everything”. They have adopted [a number of laws] without thinking of the consequences,” the Communist leader said. As a result, he went on, people have got neither any social benefits left, nor money to pay for healthcare and education. Now, following the March elections and on the eve of the parliamentary vote, United Russia got nervous and decided to “hide their backsides” behind the front.
While criticizing the leadership's initiative and ruling out the very possibility of joining Putin's movement, the Communists, however, decided to follow the coming political season's trend and announced the creation of their own political platform – the Militia. Just like their opponents, they intend to unite over a thousand organizations and thousands of private individuals. Earlier in July, while commenting on the move, Zyuganov said that “our patriotic movement is the first step to building socialism in the 21st century in Russia”. He added that “Our militia is a like the flag that unites all the honest and deep-thinking citizens of our country.”
Despite a decline in popularity as compared to previous years, Putin still remains the most popular politician in the country according to opinion polls. A survey by Levada Center revealed that if the presidential election was held in June of this year, Putin would get 23 per cent of the votes, President Dmitry Medvedev would come second with 18 per cent of the electorate supporting him, while Zyuganov would be lagging far behind with only 4 per cent.
The KPRF leader is confident though that his lack of popularity is only due to a lack of television airtime.
“Give me a third, or a quarter of the time that is given to Putin, and we will see who will be more popular,” he stated.
As for who would be his preferable rival at the presidential election in March 2012, Zyuganov said “Let them decide themselves”. At the same time, the politician believes that “an absolutely new course, new team and new government” would be better for the country. He did not clarify though, whether a return to Communist rule would constitute such a “new course”.
Zyuganov admitted that the USSR-style economy – when 96 % of the property belonged to the state – was wrong, and ultimately led to the collapse of both the country and the Communist party. He was certain that now things would be completely different, and private businesses would be allowed to work in all fields of industry.
Criticizing the current situation, where the state still controls strategic fields of economy via state corporations, Zyuganov noted that it would be more correct to say that “entire sectors” were put into the hands of “close people,” or those friends, family members and associates of the authorities.
“And that is not capitalism, but feudalism,” the KPRF chair observed.
With ethnic clashes in Russia becoming more frequent, rising nationalism and xenophobia have become a headache for the government. Political parties now often use the so-called “Russian issue” in their election campaigns. The KPRF, as well as the Liberal-Democratic party, are now both talking about the need to protect Russians.
According to Zyuganov, 85 % of Russia's population consist of ethnic Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians.
“..It is our responsibility to build up relations so that there will be true friendship between peoples,” he said, adding that today people are split socially, nationally and in terms of their financial well-being.
“Russians have found themselves in the most demeaning of positions. And that is while Russian culture, language, and traditions could provide a basis for integrity. That includes an ability to live together [with other nations], get on well, without destroying even a single language, culture or religion,” he pointed out.
The KPRF leader also emphasized that the parliamentary election is now a priority task for the party, as plans for the presidential campaign will come later.
“If we fulfill our potential at the Duma elections – that is one question. If we don't – it will be a different story. But I would like to reiterate that today, from the perspective of our party and its supporters, the future is better than ever,” Zyuganov said.
26.07.2011, 16:03
2 comments
Russian editor offers newspaper post to Khodorkovsky’s partner LebedevWhile a court considers the early release of Platon Lebedev, a friend and partner to former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the editor-in chief of the Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta has offered him a job as an economic analyst. |
26.07.2011, 18:36
6 comments
Lukashenko wants former Soviet states to create “real military and political bloc”The Belarusian leader is using his country’s position as the current president of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to reform the alliance and answer current challenges. |
Donald, I think it is categorical mistake to compare Stalin’s period with the period when Leonid Brezhnev ruled the Soviet Union. Stalin presided over the Soviet Union in a difficult period where as Leonid Brezhnev ruled over the Soviet Union in calm period when the society enjoyed the benefits of commodity boom and well developed infrastructure. Stalin ruled the Soviet Union when the country was going under massive transformation from that of primarily rural and peasantry into industrial powerhouse. He also presided of the nation’s fate during the greatest threat to the Soviet Union and his ruthless determination to win the war meant he was willing to take advice, let the generals and the Marshals do the fighting and planning to strategy in the battlefield so that he could focus his stills in the mechanisation of the war industry ( see the documentary the Unknown War—the volume that focus on industrial production in the East). The massive industrial production of war materials after 1942 is what defeated the combined forces of occupied Europe and the Axes forces against the Soviet Union. Russians are wise people and those who are currently resisting the erasure of Stalin from history include people whose families were direct or indirect victims of Stalin’s purges. People are looking at history and Stalin objectively-something which current neo-liberal elite in Russia and their foreign backers want to overcome through crude propaganda and outright suppression of free speech ( denial of Stalin posters in public buses).
Citizen K: I think you are correct in your comments on the relationship between the present communists and Stalin. However, even though I have never lived in Russia (or the USSR), based on what I have heard others say who do live there, and also on results, I would say that an underrated leader was Leonid Brezhnev. Relatives of mine in the Ukraine say that during the Brezhnev era, people had everything they wanted, everybody had a job, and food prices were cheap. Contrast that with the utter ponzi schemes that exist in food prices today. Also, it was under Brezhnev that the USSR (and by extension Russia) achieved the peak of its international influence and power. Indeed, it became the most powerful country on earth in the 1970`s, even more powerful than the US. It`s been all downhill for Russia since then.
There`s something about these Communists that doesn`t really sit well with me. If I were voting, I would probably vote for them, but I would also be trying to unite them with other non-official left wing groups like the Rot Front and leaders like Anpilov. It`s a shame there`s so much splintering of the left in Russia. They have to unite if they are to make electoral headway.








Communists the world over are a sad, tired old joke. They have nothing today as they had nothing other than killing and manipulation of the truth and reality when they cynically brutalized the Russian People or anyone who came under their foul and murderous controll. How anyone and Russians or people from the former Soviet Republics in particular can hold Communists in any positive regard amazes me. Communists were right up there with the Nazis with their brutality and total disregard for anyone other than a few at the top. Having said that I think Mr Zyuganov is a chip off the old block, a gangster like the rest of them. To hell with communists and communism. They have done nothing for the world except steal and kill millions of innocent people. Any affection left over for them is clearly a sort psychological aberation, a symptom of the Stockholm Syndrome that, with lots of therapy and perhaps a walk over the bulging graves of the Ukranians, the Poles, the Latvians, the Estonians, the Finns, etc etc could help rectify. The list is long and so shameful. So please save your sympathies for the psychos of Russian history and get with the modern program. I was born in South Africa and even we were threatened by them and having fought them in Angola in the mid 80,s let me tell you that they die like anyone else with a bullet in them. Now thats egalitarianism for you!