Breaking news

Oklahoma tornado death toll jumps to 91

Indefinite detention: 'Architecture of fascist state'

Published time: December 15, 2011 07:31
Edited time: December 16, 2011 20:36
PAUL J. RICHARDS / AFP
Download video (35.44 MB)
Embed

Terror suspects in America could be held in prison indefinitely – without charge or trial. The military will be able to take custody of alleged terrorists virtually without question. Critics say this would be a stark violation of human rights.

­The controversial National Defense Authorization Act, which was met with criticism from human rights activists, faced a presidential veto, but since last month Obama has retracted his warning.

“The White House explained it would veto the bill because these provisions, mandating military custody amount to a restriction of president’s authority,”
explains John Glaser, assistant editor at Antiwar.com.

“But in truth it’s reasonable to assume that a veto threat was a mere political theater, because Senator Carl Levin one of the provision’s primary authors revealed during senate debate that it was the Obama administration itself who requested the inclusion of language mandating military detentions, including US citizens. So you could say the administration never changed their minds, it was just a sort of doing it for public consumption,” he told RT.

Obama’s current position is in sharp contrast to the promises to shut down Guantanamo Bay he gave during the election campaign.

“I am skeptical it was ever Obama’s plan to actually do that. He faced some congressional backlash for wanting to close Guantanamo Bay so early, but he has already agreed to indefinite detention of people that are left into Guantanamo. And that bill has within it language that would prevent transfer from Guantanamo to US prisons and any sort of US trials for people, who are still at Guantanamo right now. I think people were just fooled by Obama’s promises, regarding Guantanamo,” the activists pointed out.

Radio host, Ralph Schoenman says that under the new law the US military will be entitled to “disappear” American citizens for offences that are never even made public – and not only that.

“If you look carefully at this legislation, if you have a family or a friend who publicizes that you’ve disappeared they too can be detained. If anybody helps you with a taxi ride or attempts to give assistance to your family in the circumstances of your disappearance, they too can be detained. This is the architecture of the fascist state,”
he told RT.


The legislation is yet another step on the path of deteriorating human rights in America, Glaser believes.

“Human Rights Watch has already condemned [the bill], calling it a historic tragedy for rights, but I doubt the international community will do anything about it. The government has already assumed that they have the power to detain US citizens indefinitely without trial. The targeted assassination of US citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki proves again that the government has already in every practical sense dismissed the due process rights for Americans,” he said.

Comments (28)

NorskeDiv (unregistered) 17.10.2012 23:53

"Two Chinese will be sitting on some ancient fence."
So they're NOT Chinese Americans? Could have fooled me, by looking around any modern US city (or the current US administration) Chinese people seem to get along quite well in America. 

0

Undo

fine2opine 16.12.2011 18:39

The Monk wrote in #2
Anyone convicted of killing scores of people should deserve at least life in prison. The difference here as I see it is a terrorist was captured "before" he killed scores of people. Should that person be required to be treated the same way. Intent verses action. Most people feel that just because someone was caught before that serious crime was committed they should be inprisoned for a long time...if not a life time. I can't believe 'Monk' is getting -10 on commets.  I agree with him.  So, we can and should suspend habeus corpus?  Miranda is now just a town in New Mexico?  All those negatives must mean those people are in tune with the movie "Minority Report?"  Where do we say enough? Where do we draw the line?  Are poeple endorsing the thought police of Orwell?  C'mon people!!!!!!!!!!!!

0

Undo

fine2opine 16.12.2011 18:34

John Kinsella wrote in #20
World is getting ugly fast. Hopefully I am not in jail by the time I press enter. The US gov't is doing this because of the influx of Muslim Immigrants. The US is doing this, not because of Muslims, but because it is (one small) part of a master plan.  Haven't you ever watched a Bond movie? There is a always a villain, and that villain is usually well prepared with entrenched plans.  Of course, they always get defeated. Unfortunately, this isn't a Bond movie, and the bad guys will probably win this one.  The Muslims are simply the "Goldstein" of 1984. (I think that's his name...it's been a while).  Muslims are a PRETEXT.   To install a totatlitarian regime, you must have an amorphous enemy.  With this pretext, anyone can be an enemy.  The definition of 'enemy' (as defined by our traitors on capital hill) is broad, thus allowing the powers to round up detainiees under the umbrella of 'terrorism'. &n bsp;

0

Undo

View all comments (28)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us