EU approves tough round of sanctions on Iran

Published time: October 15, 2012 12:36
Edited time: October 16, 2012 08:33
Nouri Petrochemical facilities of the South Pars gas field in the southern Iranian port of Assaluyeh (AFP Photo / Atta Kenare)

The EU has approved one of the toughest sets of sanctions yet on Iran’s nuclear program. It includes banning the import of Iranian natural gas into union nations.

The sanctions also include a ban on financial transactions between European and Iranian banks, with some exceptions for those involving humanitarian aid, food and medicine purchases.

The decision was made during Monday’s meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg.

“The [EU] Council has agreed additional restrictive measures in the financial, trade, energy and transport sectors, as well as additional designations, notably of entities active in the oil and gas industry," a written statement issued by the European Union council said.

Further export restrictions were imposed on industrial software, graphite, and the metals which the EU believes could be used to develop ballistic missiles. The new restrictions also prohibit eurozone companies from providing shipbuilding technology and classification services to Iranian tankers and cargo vessels.

The sanctions aim to pressure Iran to cooperate in talks regarding its nuclear program. British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the new sanctions were a “sign of our resolve in the European Union that we will step up the pressure.”

And that pressure is expected to continue until Iran agrees to negotiations.

The statement released by the EU council said that ministers remained “determined to increase, in close coordination with international partners, pressure on Iran.”

But the country's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamanei, said the “insidious policies” did nothing to upset political stability in the country, and that Iran was able to maintain a sense of "tranquility" despite growing economic pressure.

“The Iranian nation has managed to show its capabilities to the world despite threats, sanctions and the enemies’ hostilities relying on this stability and tranquility,” Khamanei was quoted by Fars News Agency as saying.

Also on Monday, leading European satellite provider Eutelsat SA took 19 Iranian television and radio broadcasters off the air, in a move to abide by earlier EU sanctions. The decision prompted accusations of censorship and threats of lawsuits from Iranian state television.

“We terminated the contracts because it was the order of the European Commission. We have to follow it,” Karen Badalov, area manager of Eutelsat SA, told Press TV.

This is the second round of EU sanctions imposed on Iran in the past few months.

In July, the European Union banned the import of Iranian crude oil, as well as financial services relating to the sale, purchase and transport of Iranian oil.

The sanctions marked a major policy change for the EU, which was traditionally a major importer of Iranian oil.

The decision followed a set of sanctions issued by the US last June, when Washington banned the world's banks from making oil-related transactions with Iranian financial institutions. Previous US sanctions have banned almost all trade with Iran, with certain exceptions for activity ‘intended to benefit the Iranian people.’

Several other countries – including Switzerland, Japan, Australia and Canada – have also imposed sanctions on Iran in recent years, in response to what they describe as Tehran’s lack of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA).

The US and its allies have long accused Iran of using its nuclear program as a cover to develop atomic weapons, though Tehran frequently vows its program is solely for civilian purposes.

The fresh sanctions come despite the Islamic Republic's recent statement that it is ready to show flexibility and resume negotiations on halting higher-grade uranium enrichment if its conditions are met.

Anti-sanctions campaigner Professor Abbas Edalat believes it is not the fear of a nuclear-armed Iran that is behind the mounting sanctions, rather the West’s determination to depose the Iranian government.

“So all of these [are] designed so that the negotiations fail because the US and EU, prodded by Israel, are interested in the regime change,” he told RT.

They want the Iranian people to hurt – hurt so much so that there is mass discontent in the country and riots so they can pave their road for regime change in Iran, in the same way that they brought about the regime change in Iraq.”

Edalat argues than the sanctions are doing quite the opposite from what the West has planned. The sanctions are uniting the Iranian people against the West.

Even some sectors of the middle class, who have been traditionally pro-West, are now quite hostile towards the United States and the EU and all the hawkish policies against Iran.”

Comments (91)

T (unregistered) 16.10.2012 19:15

If I was Iran, I wouldn't talk about this is not humanly, these sanctions. They need to show they can survive without others help. Iran should coörporate with the other states that are said to obey by the West.
I just wished Iran wouldn't attack homosexuals like they do, yes they are  allowed to put a harsh standpoint, as world isn't better, they are just true about that. Iran can put harsh punishment, but then again they should disallow that people can use unpublic evidence for example that people are homosexual. I think Muslims overall should be against going in to affair of others, aslong as they don't do it publicly, as childrren might be hurt on abuse. And Muslims overall must be against anti-human(free will men), as the Prophet Mohammad was taken his free will, and he fighted back when he didn't have anyother choice. Besides, there is only one God and non other, and all others just want to hurt Humans, as God showed at Adam and Eve full freedom.
What people do under their coat, who cares, it's about spreading a thing that stops humanity. Like the West they are perpertrating a rule as the good guys, but in silence doing things to destroy humans. World tried this before, but the top guys know what was the mistakes, they learned from it, and I think with current technology and economie, they might succeed, maybe until Jesus returns, the most forgivable in flesh and blood alive I think. But if Jesus were to come back, I hope he should do as quickly as possible, as strong as possible, as Jesus should know that what he and his people were putt through some people alive are put through worse, maybe not as forgivable, but they are being put through and soon there is no hope.

0

Undo

The Beak (unregistered) 16.10.2012 14:08

Iranians who are opposed to Ahmedinajad's leadership must now wake up and smell the roses that the US/Isreal economic war that is being fought against Iran is also supported by the Europeans who are all VASSALS of the United States. Iran then must focus on the Non-Alingned and the BRICS group for support. The US/Euro want full spectrum dominance, they must not be checkmated in Syria.

0

Undo

juda,usa (unregistered) 16.10.2012 14:07

It's about oil and domination by the Western Powers, especially U.S. and Israel.  It's about land and oil.  It's about evil.  If the leaders of the world, who obviously don't believe in a God,  paid attention to physics and the laws of nature.  They each will be held accountable for their evil and greedy actions.  Law of retribution. What comes around goes around.  Has it ever dawned on the global population that an international law needs to be done that all natural resources need to be globally socialized and doled out by country need?  With an ethical profit going to the supplying country?  Has anyone noticed it is ALWAYS about natural resources and greed by corporations that cause war?  Capitalism should be allowed not on what we need to survive but on wants.  Anyone remember wars being caused because of potato chips? Has anyone noticed that 99.9 percent of laws and policies are made by about the same percentage of men?  In the idea of 'energy' isn't this something like turning on a flashlight with one battery in it? And aren't we in a dark age that one or two countries can 'rule' the world's peoples?  And one or two religions? And one or two races?  And won't we all be called to some form of accountability about the violence we have passively participated in to innocent people in destroying their lives and killing and maiming and 'Drone' killing every hour of everyday?   I think so.  I think so.

0

Undo

View all comments (91)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us