Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Britain can look at Greenwald partner's seized electronic documents

Published time: August 22, 2013 13:36
Edited time: August 22, 2013 18:10
Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett

Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett

British authorities can sift through electronic documents seized from journalist Glenn Greenwald’s Brazilian partner, in the interests of “national security”, a court ruled on Thursday. The “highly sensitive” material could risk lives, said UK police.

Two judges gave authorities until Aug. 30 to analyze “ thousands” of documents, according to a police lawyer.

“The home office and police now have seven days to prove that there is a genuine threat to national security, rather than make mere assertions as they have done today,” stated lawyer Gwendolen Morgan after the ruling was passed. 

Late on Thursday afternoon, London police announced that the data which had been seized includes "highly sensitive" material, the disclosure of which "could put lives at risk."

As the ruling was made, the judges said that UK authorities would be able to examine the confiscated information for the purpose of investigating whether Miranda is a person who is or has been concerned with the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, alongside “national security” defense reasons.

However, the ruling fueled further concern about journalistic freedoms worldwide and especially within the UK justice system since the widely-debated introduction of 'secret courts' in April.

“One of today’s troubling development was that the Secretary of State indicated that she might use the controversial new powers for closed material procedures. Both that, and the very chilling effect of the implications of today’s judgment, are something that journalists worldwide should be very concerned about.”

The Guardian newspaper took the case to court on Thursday to demand the materials seized from Greenwald’s Brazilian partner be protected by injunction. “Confidentiality, once lost, can clearly never be restored,” said Morgan in a statement.

Gwendolen Morgan, the lawyer for David Miranda makes a statement to members of the media outside the High Court in London August 22, 2013 (Reuters / Suzanne Plunkett)

Lawyers requested that the High Court stepped in to prevent the British government from “inspecting, copying or sharing” the data they confiscated from the journalist, who had been involved in releasing some of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden’s documents.

They have asked that the injunction be in place “until the legality of that seizure has been determined by this court”.
The 28 year old David Miranda, a Brazilian national, was detained for nine hours last Sunday under Schedule 7 of the UK’s terrorism act when he arrived at Heathrow Airport in transit to Berlin. 

Electronic materials – including computers and memory sticks - were seized from him and he was threatened with prison if he did not cooperate.

The court heard that around “tens of thousands of highly classified documents" had been taken from Miranda.
Matthew Ryder, QC, who represents Miranda requested that police reveal with whom they were sharing the information that they had obtained as a result of Miranda’s materials being confiscated.

The Met police declared on Thursday that they have already opened one criminal investigation as a result of the seized material. However, further details as to whom and why have not yet been provided.

“If interim relief is not granted, then the claimant is likely to suffer irremediable prejudice, as are the other journalistic sources whose confidential information is contained in the material seized,” Morgan said, adding that the purpose of the proceedings was to protect the confidentiality of the materials seized by the UK government.

Morgan pointed out in a witness statement made on behalf of Miranda that Schedule 7 had been invoked “for an improper purpose and was therefore unlawful”, and the decision to use it ran contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Comments (26)


Zeth Loveless 23.08.2013 16:26

Gerry 23.08.2013 04:45

This is an age of paranoia, this is a time of suspicion, no one trusts anyone anymore, we see eyes flashing in the dark. Lets look at this , do you think government agencies have better things to do than watch you? Are you so important? Or do you wish you were? It would be better if we did not give these people attention , by doing so we are just encouraging children to act up like spoiled brats. So just give it a rest and stop talking about them. (sigh)


Sounds like a typical govt shill. You are looking thought blind eyes buddy. Keep watching your Fox News and CNN


Vince 23.08.2013 09:44

Just wondering why he didn't encrypt his files and upload to a safe server for later retrieval. Carrying sensitive data around Heathrow airport was not such a smart move after all.


fran7 23.08.2013 07:30

Sadly it seems its the UK and USA governments who are acting like spoilt brats and wasting time and money to maintain their own military positions and spreading propaganda same as Weapons of Mass Destruction lie propagated by Blair and Bush which mislead UK house of parliament into unjust war with Iraq. UK should give back Gibralta to Spain because its only a costly military base and is really the Spanish mainland anyway.

View all comments (26)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us