Backdoor for foreign troops into Libya

Published time: May 04, 2011 21:17
Edited time: May 05, 2011 02:23
The International Criminal Court prosecutor has announced he will seek arrest warrants for three suspects over the deaths of hundreds of Libyans. (Image from ethiopianism.net)
Embed

The International Criminal Court prosecutor has announced he will seek arrest warrants for three suspects over the deaths of hundreds of Libyans. Some say this represents a way to bypass the UN resolution and send ground troops into Libya.

­The head prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, told the UN Security Council that there is strong evidence that peaceful protesters were shot during anti-government demonstrations in February.

The US welcomed the ICC prosecutor’s plans to request three arrest warrants for alleged crimes against humanity committed in Libya since February 15. Moreno-Ocampo did not specify who these three people are. However the ICC has been investigating Colonel Gaddafi, some of his sons and aides over what the prosecutor called “a predetermined plan to attack protesters.”

The ICC said now is the time to start planning how to implement these possible arrest warrants. And the interesting part is that carrying out these arrests will require placing foreign forces on the ground to actually do that.

The issue of enforcing any future court warrants is expected to be discussed at the meeting of the coalition countries in Rome on Thursday.

The coalition forces are really edging towards sending in ground troops. The problem is the UN resolution that allowed the military interference in order to protect civilians does not allow foreign troops on the ground.

A NATO spokesperson recently made it clear that they do want a mandate to send in troops. They say there is little sign of progress for either side in the conflict and the aerial bombardment of Libya has reached a dead end, so to break the stalemate they need to do send in troops.

But getting a mandate like that from the UN Security Council will be very difficult, considering all the criticism that the NATO operations in Libya now face. Many are deeply alarmed by the growing number of civilian casualties in Libya.

For example Russia, a prominent member at the UN Security Council, has heavily criticized NATO for going far beyond the UN resolution. Russia actually supports the decision to go after war criminals in Libya, but as Russia’s envoy to the UN said: “What about NATO strikes that killed civilians, who is going to be punished for those?”

Many analysts believe that any ground involvement will lead to an escalation of the conflict and to more violence on the ground. And with these recent developments, coalition forces could be looking for a way to go around the UN resolution.

Some say those ICC warrants may provide that loophole.

Johan Galtung, rector of the Transcend Peace University, believes that now, with the ICC focusing only on crimes against humanity in Libya, and passing over similar situations in Syria and Yemen, we most likely will see a ground operation in Libya.

“There is a principle in law called equality before law,” he said. “Equality before law demands equality in issuing orders for arrests. Any focus on Libya alone only confirms the suspicion.”

Comments (6)

Abdul 30.05.2011 03:44

The International Criminal Court is a corrupt, hypocritical and crooked organization for it deliberately allows the leaders of the US regime, the Israeli of terror and NATO to attack  Iraq, Afghanistan , Libya etc illegally and attack and destroy civilian targets and infrastructure and terrorize and mass murder countless innocent people! Shame on the so-called 'International Criminal Court'!

0

Undo

Sunil 15.05.2011 13:19

US welcomes the move!! Some questions:1. Western media is showing civilians are killed by Gaddafi's forces again and again. They are not asking how many civilians are killed by rebels?or civilian killing by rebels is justified?2. How many civilians were killed by NATO forces any news or question asked by anyone??or their bomb attack accuracy is so excellent that they are targeting&n bsp;only Gaddafi's forces.3. How you want to change the regime by killing Gaddafi because he is not surrendering then what is the option make it clear?4. If the option is to kill Gaddafi then why not NATO or US repeat the same adventure as they did in Pakistan during OBL killing? If they can do covert action in PAK which has strong army then why not in Libya having no army at all. Or Navy Seals and their stealth helos are doing some picnic?5. It can be justified that three unkown killers gives the right to NATO to enter soldiers in Libya?

0

Undo

polondia 06.05.2011 18:48

Oh Please show us the bodies. Also, the bodies of mass graves of thousands of his people that Gaddahfi, is supposedly have killed. Show the proof. Or, American and Nato stop lying.  It's becoming more obvious that Gaddahfi, wants to trade oil for gold, of which the US and Europe can not afford. This is why the US and NATO want him dead, to prevent a change in the purchase currency for oil. This is far more important to the West than protecting Arab and Muslim civilians. If the African gold Dinar gets into play, oppose to the US reserve currency, the West as known today, will be finished. 

0

Undo

View all comments (6)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us