Iraqi PM: Turkey not threatened by Syria, don't overblow war or drag in NATO

Published time: October 10, 2012 12:39
Edited time: October 12, 2012 16:39
A Turkish Air Force F16 jet fighter prepares to take off from an air base during the Anatolian Eagle military exercise in the central Anatolian city of Konya. (Reuters / Umit Bektas )

NATO must not use protecting Turkey as a pretext to intervene in Syria, the Iraqi PM said during a Russian press conference. The statement followed an escalation of tensions between Turkey and Syria following last week’s cross-border shelling.

­“The story goes that supposedly Syrian planes dropped bombs on Turkish territory, but everything has been over-exaggerated, even if it did really happen,”  Nouri al-Maliki said.

­He argued that no one was threatening Turkey, and that there was no need for them to call on NATO for support.

“Turkey is being presumptuous, you could say, as if it were taking responsibility for solving the Syrian conflict instead of the Syrian people and wants to impose its own solution. For this reason the international community needs to stop Turkey from intervening," he said.

Al-Maliki is on a three-day visit to Russia, where he said that Iraq's position on Syria is similar to Russia's one as both countries are calling for peaceful resolution of the conflict. Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin postponed a visit to Ankara, Turkey, because of his busy schedule this month, the Kremlin press office told RT.

Putin’s decision to postpone the visit came amid increased antagonism between Turkey and Syria. Previously, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appealed to Damascus and Ankara to negotiate to avert an escalation in the conflict, referring to the shelling as a “tragic casualty.”

“To Moscow’s great disappointment Ankara has taken a very firm stance against President Assad in the Syrian conflict, Turkey has practically become a base for the so-called ‘Friends of Syria.’ … Ankara’s actions contradict Russia’s calls not to take sides in the conflict,” journalist and political commentator Sergey Strokan told RT.

The Turkish government also bolstered its military presence in the region, including the deployment of 25 F-16 jet fighters to the Diyarbakir base, 100 kilometers from the Syrian border.

­

Reports of Iraqi involved in weapon delivery to Syria ‘untrue’

­While in Moscow, Al-Maliki also pushed back on allegations that Iraq allowed Iran to deliver weapons to Syria through its territory.

“This is not true,” he told Interfax on Wednesday, arguing that the claims are politically motivated. “We have been doing random checks of aircrafts and have not discovered any weapon aboard.”

“We have found no evidence of Iranian planes carrying weapons to Syria. We clearly stated to Syria and Iran that we allow delivery of different cargo, but not weapons,” he said.

Earlier, the US urged Iraq to close its airspace to Iranian planes.

Strokan points to Maliki’s latest statements as evidence that Arab opinion on the Syrian conflict is fractured.

“Many want to present the situation the way that Russia with its principal position towards Syrian question puts itself in the opposition to the entire Arab world, which allegedly already fully supports Syrian opposition. But, as we see, Iraq’s statements stand in stark contrast with statements of Persian Gulf monarchs,” Strokan said.

Russia′s President Vladimir Putin (L) speaks with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki during their meeting  in the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow on October 10, 2012. (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev)
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (L) speaks with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki during their meeting in the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow on October 10, 2012. (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev)

Comments (33)

bvit 13.10.2012 00:22

Turkey needs to understand that they will eventually be in Syria's shoes and there won't be anyone left to help them.  Divide and conquer is the name of that game.

+1

Undo

Donald (unregistered) 11.10.2012 04:34

Captain Obvious: What planet are you from? The US invades a sovereign country with 150,000 troops, kills hundreds of thousands of people, outlaws the legitimate governing party which has deep historic roots not only in Iraqi society but in pan-Arab society as well, and which had been successful in eliminating the void between Sunni and Shiite, employs sophisticated psy-ops measures to whip up divisions between Sunni and Shiite which had been eliminated under the Baathists, and then runs a bunch of farcical elections with candidates between whom the differences are akin to the differences between Democrats and Republicans in the US, and you call that democracy? Every single candidate you mentioned didn`t even live in Iraq before the invasion. The US created the artificial divisions between Arab and Kurd, Sunni and Shiite etc. They didn`t care who won the elections they ran under military occupation because they made sure before the elections that anyone who could remotely threaten their strategic interests was either killed or had fled. Anyone who won would take no steps to dismantle the Green Zone or the US embassy. Iraq will only be free and independent again when the US leaves a la Saigon; driven from the roof of their embassy while hanging on to the outside of the helicopters like the rats they are.

+4

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 11.10.2012 03:28

Donald (unregistered) wrote in #9
Monk: Iraq is buying nowhere near the Russian made weapons today that they did in the pre-US invasion era. Saddam Hussein had more Soviet-built tanks in his army than any other country on earth, except for the Soviet Union itself. Nowadays, the bulk of their weapons come from the US/Nato axis. The picture showing Putin with Maliki is a disgrace. I recall in the lead-up to the invasion, Putin rightly tried with all means available to him to dissuade the US from invading and earned a lot of respect for doing so. Now, here he is cavorting and laughing with a US installed butcher whose sole purpose is to serve US geo-strategic goals in the region. Where is the commitment and consistency here? If this is how the new Russia conducts foreign policy; just blowing with the wind, then I`ve had it with these weaklings. **************** ****What planet you from?  US wanted Alawi.  Although they were fond of Sistani and grateful for his steadying influence the SCIRI-SIIC party was also aligned with Sadr whom the US thought was a rabid sectarian.  However, the installed system was democracy and the people of Iraq chose the siic party over seculars.  The siic party cut a deal with kurds and made maliki PM.  I have doubts that he will repeat without vote rigging.  The kurds generally regret the deal since Maliki has the reputation inside of Iraq of trying to act like a dictator.

0

Undo

View all comments (33)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us