All sides in Libya should focus on peace – Russian Foreign Minister

Published time: May 06, 2011 09:45
Edited time: May 06, 2011 15:20
Sergey Lavrov (RIA Novosti / STF)
Embed

The International Contact group on Libya has agreed to give the rebels more money, with a temporary fund in place within weeks. Russia believes by making any decisions on the internal Libyan conflict, the Contact group is exceeding its authority.

­Recently, the French Foreign Minister suggested Russia could become one of the members of the International Contact group on Libya.

The International Contact group that includes NATO members, the Arab league and a number of international organizations was created at the April summit in London to provide political guidance for all military and humanitarian assistance operations in Libya.

On Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reacted by saying he believes the only body that should adopt and monitor resolutions on unfolding conflicts, such as the one in Libya, is the UN Security Council.

He added that the UN has not delegated these rights to any other international group, therefore the creation of such groups seems excessive to him.

The Contact group has established itself. And now it’s trying to take responsibility on to itself about the policy of the international community towards Libya. And not only Libya, we’re hearing voices that are calling for this group to decide what to do in other states in the region,” said Lavrov.

We believe that all sides should be focusing on the peaceful resolution of the situation. And not supporting one side in what is essentially a civil war,” he added.

These comments were made at a joint conference of the Russian Foreign Minister and the Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister.

Traditionally, Russia and China co-ordinate their views on major international events. The most recent example of that was in March, when both countries abstained from the no-fly zone resolution vote over Libya.

What started as unrest in Libya has already claimed the lives of thousands of civilians.

Russia again raised its voice against the Western military intervention in Libya, saying that NATO has gone far beyond its UN mandate by sending guided bombs on Gaddafi’s compounds, and by considering a ground operation in Libya.

Even China, which had been very diplomatic on the Libyan issue so far, is becoming more and more vocal, saying the only two options that may be considered in this situation are a peace agreement and an immediate cease-fire.

Both Russia and China again stressed that a conflict between Gaddafi and the rebels is exclusively an internal matter for the Libyan people.

Comments (4)

james r. 13.05.2011 01:47

NATO will never attempt the sort of military adventure currently being waged in Libya upon Syria, because the latter nation has 'chemical',and ballistic missile deterents,to put a serious 'hurting!' on them. While it is shocking! to see that no country has sprung to Libya's defense. Perhaps North Korea may get involved after their embassy got struck in Tripoli.

0

Undo

3rdbasegeorge 07.05.2011 05:36

Mr Lavrov, states, "We believe that all sides should be focusing on the peaceful resolution of the situation. And not supporting one side in what is essentially a civil war" 
This is an excellent point. The USA/NATO has no way to guarantee, a sponsored REBEL victory will secure excellence in litigation nor even inclusiveness of political formation. Prima Facie, to focus on the military response of Government forces as exclusively belligerent while explicitly activating the legal represention of military values by attacking Libya is not the vernacular of the High State. To disdain the Government Libyan military response can be classified depressive, an expression of the Low State. Even an insinuation of systemic corruption, from superior asymmetric power.  The one that consistently turns US assets against it. This instruction holding sway over US/NATO/LIBYAN GOVT and LIBYAN REBEL personnel who do not and cannot claim metaphysical insulation against alienation from the mode of blood sacrifice, which they do currently concert.
Yet is that not what Rebel and Government forces feel obliged to explicate?  That each others desire for rational military experience is lascivious and deserving of utter prejudice and persecution, what an uproar there would be if the Security Council's table value was a barren woman, upon which NATO did loose many stones?  In dreams you dress and supplicate the fallen heroes of the blood sacrifice, yet when you wake you fear only for peace, thus you forget the child you threw into the air of war.  Whom you then would spear for his/her betterment.
North Africa is the place where the Great Bear's Teeth can be recut, for the full recovery of Russia from the diffucult Yeltsin era.

0

Undo

franco 06.05.2011 14:10

To have approved the bombing first knowing full well what the real intentions of NATO were and then say naughty naughty and turning the face the other way, it is not good enough for the new number one in the world Russia. Either she takes up her new responsability by calling an all party conference in Libya to seek the necessary changes or, Mr. Lavrov should shut up. Franco

0

Undo

View all comments (4)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us