Gaddafi’s Libya 'threatened Africa’s subordinate role'

Published time: September 14, 2011 22:25
Edited time: September 15, 2011 02:25
Libyan National Transition Council (NTC) fighters chat at the NTC's last outpost near Sadada, on the highway from Misrata to Sirte, one of the last strongholds of Libya's fugitive Moamer Kadhafi on September 14, 2011 (AFP Photo / FRANCISCO LEONG)
Download video (55.09 MB)
Embed

With Libya’s transitional leadership saying they awaite state visits by British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, some analysts are warning that Africa may yet face echoes of its colonial past.

­Gaddafi’s Libya was the engine uniting Africa, argued Dan Glazebrook, a political analyst on the Middle East. And a united Africa, he noted, would have meant a final break from the centuries of Western colonial rule over the continent.

Gaddafi was the main driving force behind founding the African Union in 2002,” he told RT. “His country was the main financial contributor to the three major financial institutions of the African Union: the African Central Bank, the Investment Bank and the African Monetary Fund. Between them, they would have posed a huge challenge to the IMF hegemony in Africa.

Moreover, Libya’s dinar, which was proposed as the single currency of the union, would have posed a threat to the US dollar, British pound and French franc as the main currencies in Africa.

All of this is a threat to Africa’s subordinate role in the global economy,” claimed the political analyst.

Glazebrook also played down Washington’s concerns about emerging sectarian violence in post-revolutionary Arab states, including Libya.

Portraying “the US as some kind of champion of religious tolerance is part of an exercise in ideological confusion designed to obscure the fact that the US has been the biggest supporter of religious intolerance around the world,” he said. “It is a part of a divide-and-rule strategy to keep the Third World’s peoples from uniting.

Comments (7)

Dell 11.11.2011 10:32

Normally I'm against killing but this article slaughtered my ingroance.

0

Undo

Roger Coze 16.09.2011 13:09

@ jaime How long would that union last? a week or two?

0

Undo

Roger Coze 16.09.2011 00:46

@ Tony_42 You obviously ignored what I said about Africa being the worst continent and the example of Sudan. The Afican unification was moronic and even the stronger african nations relized that they would have to take care of the weaker nations. Even if they somehow got africa as one nation ,it would only be a matter of days that rebellions would spring up ,as we have seen they are more then willing to rebel. do not forgot the islamic terrorist, Around half of Africa is christian and those terrorist would definitly not be happy about that, you have an example of that right now, Israel. also changing a currency to gold would lead to less export

0

Undo

View all comments (7)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us