NATO bombs Gaddafi’s compound hours after he appears on TV

Published time: May 12, 2011 16:44
Edited time: May 13, 2011 01:53
Tripoli: A picture taken during a government-guided tour on May 12, 2011 shows a damaged buildilng in Bab al-Aziziya in Tripoli, following NATO air strikes on Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi's compound in which three people were killed, according to a government spokesman. (AFP Photo / Mahmud Turkia)
Embed

NATO bombs have hit the Libyan capitol of Tripoli, reportedly killing six civilians, including Libyan journalists, and wounding 25.

­At least four airstrikes targeted the North Korean embassy and Gaddafi's compound.

This comes just hours after Gaddafi made a TV appearance for the first time since a NATO attack killed his youngest son and three grandchildren more than a week ago.

Government spokesperson Mussa Ibrahim told the press that the airstrikes hit a place where dozens of Libyans come every night to support Gaddafi. Some of them come with their families. He stressed that this compound does not contain any military facilities.

Since the beginning of the NATO campaign in Libya, this building had been attacked several times and now it stands in quite a grim condition, with parts of it blown away and deep craters left in two locations around it.

On Tuesday NATO spokesperson General Claudio Gabellini assured the press that “NATO is not targeting individuals; it is not in our mandate. Our mandate is to protect the civilian population from attacks or from the threat of attacks by the Gaddafi regime forces.

Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama reportedly invited rebel leaders for talks in Washington on Friday.

Kate Hudson, general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, says that when the UN Security Council voted to take action against Libya, it was done in the name of protecting civilians, but what is going on now is far from protection.

“Now, with the escalation of the air attacks, they are hitting, as it seems, more and more civilian targets, and this is a great concern,” she said. “I very much hope that the international community takes a strong stand against this, otherwise more civilians will be killed. We have heard from a UN agency today expressing concern to the Security Council that civilians are suffering as a result of the air strikes.”

This again raises the question of international law,” she continued. “It is not legal to intervene in civil wars. I think inviting those leaders to Washington for talks shows that Obama is disregarding that aspect of international law.

­Paris-based author and journalist Barry Lando agrees that NATO is going beyond its mandate, but argued that the reasons for that are external, and that the alliance is doing its best.

“I think NATO is under tremendous pressure to perform, and I think they are doing their best,” he told RT. “I think they are stepping up, probably much beyond what they originally planned to do, and certainly much beyond what their countries that first ordered them to go in… thought they’d be doing.”

“I think that they may not have realized,” he added, “that, as had been warned during [the campaign in Iraq], relying on air power was not going to win the battle for them.”

­Eric Margolis, a columnist, author and war correspondent, says he got the impression that Gaddafi had the strength of character to survive challenges back in the 1980s, when he interviewed the Libyan leader in person.

“It struck me back then that he is a man with a mission, he is one of the longest-serving Arab leaders, having been in power since 1969, with numerable attempts to kill him by different powers,” Margolis said. “For now, at least, he is going to continue fighting.”

Margolis also stated the US has been behind the assault on Libya all along. Moreover, according to Margolis, Washington thinks it can define whether the regime in Syria is illegitimate or not.

“Washington thinks it has the right and duty to decide this,” he said. “I have been picking up reports from Washington that the US is going to move strongly against Syria.”

Comments (7)

Kaylee 11.11.2011 15:10

I'm impressed by your wrnitig. Are you a professional or just very knowledgeable?

0

Undo

Joe 14.05.2011 10:09

An illegal war, multiple attempts to kill an head of state, continuos violation of the UN resolutions (providing weapons and military aid to armed rebels), more than 6.000 strikes on a country, killing civilians... What else? Oh yes, after the bombs hit Geddafi's house, the so-called "International Criminal Court" is also ready to target Gaddafy and family with arrest warrants... The result is that international institutions lost all credibility. Western media are of course backing this illegal war and I really wonder why Russia and the other BRICS countries cannot manage to stop this unbelivable mess. UN Resolutions was there to obtain a ceasefire, not an endless bombardement on Libya! Shame on NATO

0

Undo

arronpolarrd 13.05.2011 17:35

I think The US and its brother nations cannot be at peace when there is not one dying some where in the world. Thats what happens when people get money and they luck what to use it for. I wish God could elliminate such groups in the world

0

Undo

View all comments (7)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us