Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​Germany skeptical of Obama’s pledge that NSA will not spy on foreign leaders

Published time: January 19, 2014 09:32
Edited time: January 21, 2014 13:00
Demonstrators take part in a protest against the US National Security Agency (NSA) collecting German emails, online chats and phone calls and sharing some of it with the country's intelligence services in Hanover, northern Germany (AFP Photo)

Demonstrators take part in a protest against the US National Security Agency (NSA) collecting German emails, online chats and phone calls and sharing some of it with the country's intelligence services in Hanover, northern Germany (AFP Photo)

Germany has called for less rhetoric and more action in the wake of President Obama’s pledge to stop spying on world leaders. While the announcement was greeted with optimism, politicians said it was “too little, from a German point of view.”

Barack Obama sought to allay European fears of the NSA gathering intelligence on its leaders in an interview on German TV. He said that the NSA would continue to spy on foreign governments, but that German Chancellor Angela Merkel was safe from the prying eyes of the NSA.

“I don't need and I don't want to harm that relationship by a surveillance mechanism that somehow would impede the kind of communication and trust that we have,” he said in Saturday’s interview with ZDF's heute-journal, reiterating his previous statement Friday that the NSA would no longer spy on the leaders of the US’s allies.

“And so what I can say is: as long as I'm president of the United States, the chancellor of Germany will not have to worry about this,” he added. US-German relations were put under strain by the leaked reports that the NSA was monitoring the telephone and internet communications of millions of Germans, including Chancellor Merkel – who likened the NSA’s activities to those of communist East Germany’s Stasi secret police.

Classified data leaked by former CIA worker Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had been monitoring Chancellor Merkel's personal cellphone. The Americans also used their Berlin Embassy as a platform to monitor the cellphone communications of other high-ranking German politicians.

The German response to Obama’s announcement of the overhaul of the NSA on Friday was for the most part positive. However, some politicians have said a mere change of rhetoric is not enough and proof is needed to ensure the US agency has reformed.

Stephan Mayer, of the conservative Christian Social Union, told the Deutsche Welle that he was “positively surprised” by Obama’s speech, but his words needed to be followed by actions. Meanwhile, CSU party member Wolfgang Bosbach had a dig at Obama’s speech on German radio, saying that the pledge not to surveil heads of state was not “extraordinary progress.”

"This promise is only marginally assuring, since most of the people in our country aren't heads of state or government." He added that Obama merely stated the obvious.

Other political figures were also less than impressed by Obama’s pledges, suggesting they were just empty words.

Data protection expert Jan Philipp Albrecht, Green Party member in the European Parliament, said it was just a “change of rhetoric and not a change of heart.”

"Mass surveillance will continue. That's why it's important for Europe to keep up the pressure on the US and make clear that data security is an important asset for every EU citizen,” Albrecht said.

Obama announced changes to the NSA on Friday, stating that the organization needed a “new approach.” Under the changes, the agency will be obliged to obtain court permission to dip into the trove of metadata gathered on citizens by the agency.

Comments (44)

 

Zandash 17.02.2014 14:46

There should be monitoring and that data should be made transparent to the public. Here's the list: judges, heads of state (elected or otherwise), high ranking military, the 1%, militarized police chiefs, those who own, control, or can influence resources used for the oppression of the masses. The people that can create or nudge countries into wars, biological pandemics, mass incarcerations, planet pollution, restriction to or contamination of lifes essential natural resources.
You get the point. That's not the struggling masses that are a threat to humanity. It's state sponsored terrorism.

 

Stefan Wijk 20.01.2014 16:14

Mike Littlefield 20.01.2014 06:12

Just because he's lied about everything else, that doesn't mean we can't believe him now.

  


Why should we believe the corporate lapdog?

 

Guy 20.01.2014 07:48

I can just picture NSA filled up with little fat computer GEEKS - All Gay Fagots - Snooping around peoples private lives in front of their computer screen with their pants hanging around their ankles. America is sick but they can still smoke their POT!

View all comments (44)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us