There was no civil war in Libya. There were assasinations, there were war crimes, there was invasion by foreign countries, there were paid mercenaries, but there was no civil war.

There was no humanitarian aid either.

What there was, was money, gold, water, oil, rebuilding contracts and waging aggressive war on a peaceful nation with a forward thinking leader.

Since i live far away from Libya i don't know what is going on in that country from my own experience. But to read just these few lines from RT News immediately raises questions inside myself like:

How is it possible that about 100 "rebels" are able to storm  the parliament "facing little resistance"?

AP states: "Among other complaints was that some nominees had links to the deposed regime of Muammar Gaddafi"

Most likely for me there is some power at work who wants to eliminate all remnants of the old regime. It goes along with the siege of Bani Walid which is specified as "tribal conflict" by most media...

Do you believe that?

And by the way: the expression "civil war" is a contradiction in itself for my understanding of civilized men solve conflicts nonviolent.

M ay the people of Libya and all other regions which are shattered by war find peace and a life of abundance and joy!

i agree with you johnny. i think its rather strange if RT picks up the mainstream bromide's of civil war on the libyan episode. it's invasion plain and blatant by the nato-rat gangsters as you said! come on RT and also  mr. putin and mr. lavrov for that matter be firm and consistent, don't play into the hands of the globalist-zionist bloody charades, not even an iota. beware of the incorrigible opportunistic, janus-faced  zionist-nato-banker- global-military-indu strial complex and their arabian and turkish proxies!