Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Neglecting public opinion is privilege of the West

Published time: March 24, 2011 00:54
Edited time: March 24, 2011 16:24
AFP Photo / Ben Stgansall
Embed

London is bracing itself for a wave of public anger this weekend as protesters are planning to take to the streets to demonstrate against the West’s military intervention in Libya.

­What many of those who will march seem to particularly object to is Western governments’ habit of lashing out at other countries for not listening to their people, while blithely ignoring public opinion on their own doorsteps.

This Saturday London might experience the biggest protest in its history, even bigger than the anti-war coalition managed in 2003, reports RT contributor Ekaterina Zatuliveter from the British capital.

To date, groups of protesters have not been well organized, but they have now decided to unite everybody affected by the actions of the coalition government.

According to polls 35-45 per cent of the British population is opposed to the intervention in Libya and many of this group aim to make their voices heard on Saturday.

Any peaceful public protest is part of any democratic system but there is some inconsistency here. The privilege to ignore the voice of the public belongs to the West. If any government anywhere seems not to pay attention to its citizens rallying on the streets, such a government immediately comes under fire  – sometimes quite literally – from the leaders of the western democracies, which label them “undemocratic”, an accusation that seems to carry great weight in the modern world.

Western democracies, in turn, can quite easily ignore of thousands of protesters without batting an eyelid, as in the UK, where despite considerable public opposition the establishment unanimously supported the Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya.

On Monday, two days after the UK started bombing Libya, the House of Commons showed rare unity when Labour MPs occupied seats next to Tories and Lib Dems to vote in support of the military operation in Libya.

In the meantime, British media reports that the operation in Libya has already cost the United Kingdom US $245 million. According to British television Sky News, almost ten million dollars of British taxpayer money are being spent daily to support the no-fly zone over Libya. One hour of flight for the Typhoon fighter jet costs the UK budget US $115 thousand.

According to British mass media, the country is considering sending a second nuclear-powered submarine to the Mediterranean, as the British submarine “Trafalgar” has already exhausted its armament of rockets. The Daily Star newspaper quoted a British military source as saying that the current operation against the Gaddafi regime is difficult to sustain, adding that Britain will soon be left without its armory.

Comments (13)

sevodnya_net 28.03.2011 20:39

You write  (in yet another blogging-style opinion disguised as news)
:
"Any peaceful public protest is part of any democratic system but there is some inconsistency here. The privilege to ignore the voice of the public belongs to the West. If any government anywhere seems not to pay attention to its citizens rallying on the streets, such a government immediately comes under fire  – sometimes quite literally – from the leaders of the western democracies, which label them “undemocratic”, an accusation that seems to carry great weight in the modern world."

Are you serious?! It is only "western governments" which ignore its people???
What the "citizens rallying on the streets" (you are presumably referring mainly to the revolutions in Middle East) are protesting about is not government policy, it is about basic freedoms and against government corruption. In the UK, for example, it's slightly different: Ask the majority of the protesters in London, for example, and they will tell you that although they despise the government, they do not want to overthrow it. They want it to change direction. Furthermore they do not run the risk of being beaten down or worse as in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Libya, Bahrain etc etc etc (and, dare I say it, Russia., hence perhaps the reason for this rather illogical piece)


0

Undo

Svyatlana 26.03.2011 16:22

Christopher, my point wasn't about the individuals' morals or lack of them. You'd better to contribute on other threads opposing the coalition actions. You've been diverted to this report on demonstration that is really not about Libya, but the "Alternative" rally in London against our government's spending cuts. In essence, you're supporting yet another disinformation. Enjoy.

0

Undo

Christopher Porritt 26.03.2011 09:23

Svyatlana   D o not assume i have no "morals" (i am very concerned that young British soldiers are not killed in another stupid war) but the UK & the USA are very selective in their "morals",i.e., if it is all about "Democracy" why don't they launch an airstrike against China,Zimbabwe,Saudi a Arabia,Egypt,North Korea,Cuba,Venezuela ,Belarus to name a few.I think it unlikely that the USA does not have some "Economic Interest" behind its decision to attack Libya.  &n bsp; 

0

Undo

View all comments (13)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us