Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Stalemate in US-Germany talks over 'no spy' agreement - report

Published time: January 14, 2014 14:43
Edited time: January 14, 2014 16:51
Reuters / Kai Pfaffenbach

Reuters / Kai Pfaffenbach

The US and German security agencies have reportedly stumbled over a bilateral treaty which would stop the US spying on the German government. According to local media reports, Washington has failed to meet Berlin’s key demands.

Tuesday’s edition of Süddeutsche Zeitung daily came out with the headline ‘The Americans lied to us’. The German daily was quoting an unnamed high-ranking local official who claimed that even in the wake of the recent scandal, when it emerged that the NSA had been tapping the mobile telephone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the White House would not promise to stop listening to German politicians’ phone calls.

Later in the day, Germany dismissed reports that the talks were close to collapse. Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere stated that they were proceeding, but failed to directly comment on the report, according to Reuters.

In October Merkel, who grew up in East Germany, where phone tapping was common practice, compared the NSA’s spying to that of the Stasi secret police in the former German Democratic Republic. Documents leaked by ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA allegedly ran a listening station from the US Embassy in Berlin.

According to Süddeutsche and a report on public broadcaster NDR, during the negotiations the US officials were expected to give German counterparts access to the alleged listening station, believed to be on the top floor of the US embassy in Berlin, and to shed light on how long Merkel’s phone had been monitored and whether she was Germany's only key politician to be targeted.

Süddeutsche has quoted a "German expert familiar with the state of the negotiations" as saying "we're getting nothing."

As a result, according to the newspaper, the head of Germany’s foreign intelligence agency (BND) Gerhard Schindler stated that if things don't improve, he would prefer not to sign the deal at all.

In the wake of the scandal which provoked public outrage in Germany, Berlin demanded "an immediate and comprehensive explanation" about what it said was "a serious breach of trust."

"Among close friends and partners, as the Federal Republic of Germany and the US have been for decades, there should be no such monitoring of the communications of a head of government," Berlin said a statement, while Angela Merkel told Barack Obama that "such practices must be prevented immediately." She phoned the US President to demand personal apologies and explanations.

However, according to Germany’s Bild am Sonntag newspaper, President Obama was aware of NSA spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Citing US intelligence sources, the newspaper claimed that NSA chief Keith Alexander briefed Obama on the bugging operation against Merkel back in 2010.

To defend the NSA’s activities, the Obama administration has chosen to justify its mass espionage operations as being in the interests of national security. In December the UN General Assembly unanimously called on a curb of supernormal surveillance of communications, however.

Germany and Brazil proposed the resolution after they learnt that the US was intercepting the communications of both Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff and Germany’s Merkel. All 193 UN member states agreed "to respect and protect the right to privacy, including in the context of digital communication." Although the UN General Assembly resolution is not legally binding, it represents the international opinion on the issue and holds political weight.

Comments (13)

 

Francisco Nunez-Perez 16.01.2014 00:15

wow.. ? really. Is that really something to talk about. Why would any government allow another to have the upper hand. Its like the pope in politics and the excommunication would come in the form of economic death.

 

Pat Richards 15.01.2014 11:48

There is no chance that they will stop surveilance of even their partners and let alone someone like Iran Russia or China. They would first jump in the icy waters in Alaska then do something like that. Even if they say that they would do it who in the right mind would thrust them. Edward Snowden is perhaps the man of the century.

 

Regula 15.01.2014 08:21

What the US calls national security is in essence total control of all other countries. Unless the US controls, it apparently feels threatened that some other nation may produce better ideas than the US. So it spies on other nations' industry, economic decision, research and developments to copy and "outdo" them - all under the name of national security. Why else would it be in the national security interest to spy on Angela Merkel, Petrobras, Dilma Rousseff?

View all comments (13)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us